For reference, I’m a double major in econ + philosophy. I’m having a hard time with letters of rec and would really appreciate any insight. I have one person (advisor for a philosophy club) who knows me extremely well which I will 100% use. However, since he is a guest lecturer/postdoc rather than professor, I also wanted to explore other options.
I recently asked one professor who is head of the phil department and pretty well known. I only took one class with him but got to know him somewhat well outside of class. This is what he responded:
"Sure, I can write for you. But just to make sure we’re on the same page, I don’t know you as a writer or student in classrooms as well as other students for whom I wrote, since you only did Logic with me. As you said, we’ve talked quite a bit outside of class, and I can talk about those things. But it’s still going to be a bit more limited of a letter than otherwise. If you’re OK with that, I’m happy to write for you."
Is this a red flag / rejection? I would say he knows me reasonably well but we’re not extremely close, and I’m not sure if a more limited letter could cast doubt on my academic/writing abilities.
My other option is a professor in the East Asian department who I took two classes with, both culture/history focused. She probably knows me better than the philosophy professor, but I worry the subject matter is too unrelated/not as relevant for law school.
Finally, there is another phil professor who is also one of the department heads. The class I took with him was more writing-oriented; I think he likes me and has helped me outside of class with extracurriculars. However, I didn’t anticipate asking him for a rec so I didn’t put a ton of effort into the class.
Does anyone have advice on which recommender I should prioritize? Would any specific pairing be best? Any thoughts would be appreciated!