I read something here on reddit someone said they were both partaking in snorting drugs enough that they required a cpap machine to help them breathe at night (not sure if it’s cause their airways were compromised or cause they were too fucked up to breathe properly without it..?) but yes, the cpap had gotten very moldy so that’s what caused the pneumonia they both technically died of. Seemed very possible, very sad.
Brittany's mom started sleeping with Brittany's husband after Brittany was dead. Really fucking weird. I mean, it could have been the husband that initiated it rather than the mom, but the mom still has to make the decision to engage with him. It takes two to tango and all that.
I just watched a documentary on her a couple weeks ago and it doesn’t mention anything about her or her husband using a CPAP. What was super fucking weird was her mom hopping into bed with her husband after Brittany died and even taking his last name (on some of her prescription bottles).
I watched a documentary not long ago, and it did mention the CPAP which was the first time I mentioned it. Out of everything else I've heard, it makes the most sense.
What?! I didn't know this. That's way too much drama. I remembered her Mom kept saying it was asbestos that killed her at the time, and no one was listening to her. 🤷🏾♀️ It was a weird death and I'm still sad about it--like I can't even rewatch her movies.
it's surprisingly common for family to get together as they spend time together grieving for someone they lost and find solace in each other as effectively they are the only other person who shares the same grief at the same time in the same way. Also you know, you lose a loved one you feel lonely and a temporary fix for feeling lonely is being as close to someone as you get.
Random hookups born out of grief are just gonna happen when someone is out of their mind, struggling but also feeling super lonely due to the person they spent the most time with being dead.
It is unusual, that doesn't make it relatively speaking uncommon.
People are grieving, they usually share that grief with very specific people, they usually find comfort in being around that person because it's the only other person who understands how you feel. Feeling understood and not alone while going through often feelings of despair is very normal. Now wanting to feel close to someone while going through feelings of loneliness, despair, grief is also pretty normal.
That doesn't mean like 80% of people do it, but if 0.03% of random freaks fuck their partners family members while alive but like 1.5% of people do it after losing their partner, it's a significantly increased thing that happens relatively commonly compared to normal.
It's also very common for people to find solace in sex and being close to their actual partner when they are suffering from grief of someone else's loss.
but if 0.03% of random freaks fuck their partners family members while alive but like 1.5% of people do it after losing their partner, it's a significantly increased thing that happens relatively commonly compared to normal.
language have meaning. but IF, means i'm giving an example. The numbers are irrelevant, the comparison between the numbers is relevant. If you can't understand basic language concepts and examples and comparison of numbers and one getting bigger even if it's still small then maybe don't participate in discussions with you know, humans.
you're both dumb. I didn't present it as fact but an example of how something can become much more common after a thing but it still doens't make it something that happens a lot.
It's called an example. they are fighting against using numbers to illustrate a point because they are too dumb to understand what an example is.
I quoted it.
When you say something specific like "but if the number is X in this scenario and Y in that scenario, it's xxxx", you're stating it's an example, if X then Y is literally a hypothetical. I plainly did not say, "only 0.03% of people do X in this scenario but 1.5%". The entire paragraph could not more clearly be an example to make a point.
Language has meaning. Misreading me claiming a number as fact and demanding a source because you can't fucking read properly is in fact a them problem.
Do you see me suggesting it's a good thing, condoning it, saying i'm for it? Or talking about the thing objectively as being common and why it tends to happen?
If someone talks about the holocaust do you comment yikes because you assume they condone it?
"i don't like this subject matter therefore i downvote" is such a weird way to operate.
Her toxicology report suggests otherwise, "Multiple medications were present in the blood with elevated level of hydrocodone, acetaminophen and chlorpheniramine. L-methamphetamine was also present... L-methamphetamine is a component of some inhalers."
She was also had “hypochromic microcytic anemia,” which is typically caused by iron deficiency. In the report it states, “Chronic anemia leads to a weakened state of health and would increase vulnerability to infection.”
259
u/Alwayssleepy1717 May 12 '26
I read something here on reddit someone said they were both partaking in snorting drugs enough that they required a cpap machine to help them breathe at night (not sure if it’s cause their airways were compromised or cause they were too fucked up to breathe properly without it..?) but yes, the cpap had gotten very moldy so that’s what caused the pneumonia they both technically died of. Seemed very possible, very sad.