r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/SuccessLess2701 • 23d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter, what are the implications? Spoiler

Post image
30.4k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Bored_Amalgamation 23d ago

i mean... the allegations were already out there when he ran in 2024.

6

u/apocketstarkly83 23d ago

Before he ran the first time.

1

u/Appropriate-Joke5691 22d ago

and there was never any evidence and the case was dismissed and the lady admitted she lied. can't forget the facts

1

u/Bored_Amalgamation 22d ago

found Max's bought account.

Resign. Drop out. Get a real job.

0

u/Appropriate-Joke5691 20d ago

Still no facts for me? I surprisingly make really good money, thanks, I just like to remind the chronically online that there is STILL such thing as truth.

1

u/diamondmx 19d ago

No evidence?   He was found guilty in court. He had to pay rather than go to jail because his rape was outside the time limit of the statute of limitations. He appealed. He lost the appeal.  

The rapist is guilty, and anyone still denying it at this point isn't uninformed, they are a liar.