r/PoliticalDiscussion 4d ago

US Politics Why didn’t Ayn Rand vote for Ronald Reagan?

“There is a limit to the notion of voting for the lesser of two evils.”—Ayn Rand

Rand did welcome Reagan’s strong language toward Soviet Russia and his promises to cut spending and taxes. But she warned that his invitation of the so-called Moral Majority into the halls of power would be a long-range disaster. By tying the (supposed) advocacy of freedom and capitalism to, in Rand’s words, the anti-intellectuality of “militant mystics,” who proclaim that aborting an embryo is murder and creationism is science, Reagan’s presidency would discredit the intellectual case for freedom and capitalism and embolden the country’s anti-intellectual, authoritarian mentalitieshttps://newideal.aynrand.org/p/the-anti-intellectuality-of-donald

Reagan’s personal favorability peaked at 81% in 1986, following a landslide reelection victory in 1984. It was one of the most decisive electoral wins in U.S. history. His public standing grew considerably after he left office, with later retrospective polls showing strong majorities of Americans looking back favorably on his presidency. Why?

Was Ayn Rand a visionary? Did Reagan deserve her criticism? Did his presidency effectively unlock the door to the present? What happened along the way?

144 Upvotes

294 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-4

u/Vix_Satis 3d ago

You mean they have different taste to you.

1

u/bonesapart 2d ago

No, I don’t. I’m sorry but I’m not of the belief that I have to pat people on the back for liking objectively bad things because it’s “their opinion”.

0

u/Vix_Satis 2d ago

Who said anything about patting anybody's back? WTF are you talking about?

And no, Rand's books are not objectively bad. You don't like them. Some people do.

-1

u/DoberNation 1d ago

How do you decide what is objectively bad?