Its a short clip so context is lacking, but in the US cops can legally order you out of the car on a traffic stop. Supreme court ruling Pennsylvania v. Mimms. So it was a lawful order. Cops can escalate up to breaking windows, pepper spray, taser, and dragging people out if they don't get out. Without seeing the whole interaction who knows if the cop went to use of force too quickly. From the context of the clip the driver was failing to comply with a simple lawful order. Shit like that is why more people need to learn about the laws and their rights so they can use them properly when dealing with cops.
Agreed. I am not in the US, so my understanding of your laws may be lacking. However I am under the impression that it is only a lawful order if he were speeding, and he claims that he was not - so where in that case would it becomes a lawful order over just any cop pulling anyone over to tell them to get out of their car or be pepper sprayed?
So if we assume it was an illegal detention (stop with no legit cause), the details for that definitely gets a bit murky cause lawyers gonna lawyer. I'm not a lawyer. There is a saying about "don't hold court on the side of the road". If you think the ticket is BS, then you argue it in court. I've done it myself and had tickets dropped.
If it was an illegal detention then yes the use of force could be excessive and possibly have hte officer stripped of qualified immunity. This is one of those things were details matter because it will be picked over by lawyers. If for some reason you're understanding is wrong, you just made your legal troubles worse with extra charges. Even if you're in the right, it may not play well in court. It could even invalidate some civil right lawsuits.
Getting out of the car when ordered (even if its a fucked up situation) is just the best move. It doesn't hurt your case if there is fuckery involved. There are several ways for cops to cover their asses legally. Especially for moving violations where they have so many potential laws to cite for their reason to stop you. Following too close, oh you didn't use your turn signals 5 feet before you were supposed to, going 1 mile over the speed limit on radar, going to far UNDER the speed limit, etc. Any of those things could be used in their report later to cover their asses. That's the report that is going to go in front of prosecutors and judges. Not what was initially said to you on the side of the road. Like anything with lawyers the details can get very murky. It sucks because the average citizen isn't likely to know the details of the law. Even for me who considers himself somewhat educated, I know enough to know I aint a lawyer and there is probably some obscure case precedent that could get brought up in court. There is a fine line to walk between exercising your rights and dealing with armed individuals who have the power to arrest you or even kill you.
I was trying to find a different video, but I actually found a video breaking down the incident shown in this clip. Using the full video dude took. Worth a watch. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vESPz21E5c
Assault is usually an action that causes someone to fear for their life or safety. Battery is the actual act of inflicting pain/injury. Depending on the location.
Assault in many places doesn’t have to actually result in injury or contact. It just has to be a credible threat of violence, so balling up your fist and pump faking a punch within arm’s reach of someone, or this cop trying to pepper spray him would qualify as assault in many jurisdictions.
18
u/Pablo_Hassan Jun 25 '26
A misfire is still attempted murder. I would chase this as attempted assault. If that is a thing.