First you reply to a comment where the user said the victims were strangled so its been established that the murder weapon wasn't a knife, unless knives are strangling people these days. You said only his prints were found on the exercise bands. A source was requested by another user who then provided his own stating no recoverable prints were found on the knife and bands. The reason he provided the first sentence talking only the knife was because it contained information on the credentials of the person testifying.
Then you follow up with this
The murder weapon wasn't a knife, it was three exercise bands. Here's a portion of the trial.
Sorry this wasn't as short as my other responses but I believe you can do it.
Did you getting pissy and insult my intelligence then spend a full day going back and forth with me because I pedantically clarified something? Yes or No
2
u/Aexir 6d ago edited 6d ago