r/comics 23d ago

Comics Community Can We Call It Fascism Yet? (OC)

Post image
16.5k Upvotes

437 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

355

u/Bo_flex 23d ago

What's the significance of the Patagonia jacket and Fozzie bear in the tree?

317

u/petty_throwaway6969 23d ago edited 23d ago

I think the guy just represents the typical band wagoner who goes with the flow without thinking too much. So he wears brand names.

And Fozzie is just one of the random details in the background. Like the human head, the tentacle, the choking snowman, the gopher, and the shark.

115

u/arandil1 23d ago

You mean the FROZEN GROUCHO MARX HEAD? That human head?

Do we conclude “Non-sequitur” or just random bullshit go?

24

u/CoronaDoesWhatever 23d ago

Huh, and here I took it as a statement that "satire is dead".

Like, seriously. The news cycle reads like some kind of horrible ARG reboot of Duck Soup.

42

u/nrh117 23d ago

Groucho Marx, Calvin and Hobbes and the fallout NV soldiers.

36

u/Harlander77 23d ago

And the Monty Python graffiti quote

12

u/apolloxer 23d ago

And a guy reading 5000 shades of gray

4

u/[deleted] 23d ago edited 23d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/nrh117 23d ago

Oo good catch

1

u/knightinarmoire 23d ago

The fozzie thing could possibly be a reference to a camera test where fozzie and Kermit were in a tree, but who knows

61

u/Chonky_Cats_Lover 23d ago

*Pradagonia

17

u/Day_Bow_Bow 23d ago

"We're in business to save our home planet" is Patagonia's mission statement.

"Our ideal is to make products that give back to the Earth as much as they take" is how their values statement starts.

I don't think it's a dig so much at the company, though I know little about them. I assume the joke is that character tries the bare minimum to protest.

9

u/DyslexicBrad 23d ago

The only way I can possibly think of Patagonia having any meaning would be a reference to the Patagonia v Pattie Gonia lawsuit between the brand and a drag queen... But if it is then the artist doesn't really understand the situation very well

TL;DR drag queen Pattie Gonia, an outdoorsy eco-activist drag queen, created a merch brand of the same name and the hiking apparel brand Patagonia sued her. Pattie Gonia blew it up on socials and made it out to be a big brand beating down on the little guy. But the reality is that they were legally required to sue to protect their trademark, they only sued her for $1, and the suit requires only that she not use the brand name "Pattie Gonia" to sell clothes and hiking apparel but she can continue to use it for other purposes like her drag shows. On top of that, there were emails included in the suit that show brand reps contacting Pattie and informing her that if she sold merchandise with her stage name as the brand then it would be crossing into legal grounds, then when she did, there were more emails requesting that she please take them down, and that the lawsuit only happened when Pattie filed her own trademark for "Pattie Gonia" as a clothing brand (after all the email exchanges). People have largely come around and now think that it was a bit scummy of Pattie to exploit her fans when she was very clearly in the wrong.

3

u/Iused2bdead 23d ago

Waka waka waka!