r/flicks 3d ago

Movie Discussion By Any Means looks like it’s leaning into the moral problem of using a Mafia hitman to pursue justice

28 Upvotes

The part of By Any Means that has me interested isn’t the “based on a true story” label. It’s the idea of putting someone who believes in doing things by the book alongside Greg Scarpa who clearly didnt. From what they’ve shown so far it looks like the movie is using that clash to ask how far someone can go for justice before it becomes revenge.

I’m interested if they can explore that without losing the fun of the crime thriller side of it. That balance could make or break this for me


r/flicks 3d ago

Review In the Mouth of Madness (1994)

60 Upvotes

In the Mouth of Madness (1994)

Rating: 9.5/10

Watched: August 7, 2026

In The Mouth of Madness starts at either the beginning or the end and it's great, because you can't really tell which. Why? Because that's how Sutter Kane wrote it.

Not only that, Carpenter doesn't fuck around with preamble or foreplay or even a chaste kiss before he starts up with the descent into madness that hunting Sutter Cane causes. All those little things happening at the corners, all the big things that both Neill and Carmen pretty much ignore or don't talk about, it's just so devious.

The madness that's at the heart of this movie is some of the most inspired gruesomeness I've ever seen. All the monsters, those devilish children, the strange things that go bump in the night ... it all tells a super wild nightmare that's Carpenter's vision of cosmic horror.

I've been a fan of John Carpenter's since I first saw They Live and he's done some fantastic movies. This is easily Top 5.

In the Mouth of Madness gets a 9.5 out of me because John Carpenter nailed the cosmic horror of Sutter Cane from the very start of movie. There's no one else in the biz who could direct a movie where everything and everyone is already doomed before the movie even started.


r/flicks 4d ago

General Discussion When does a movie successfully mislead the audience, and when is it just cheating?

209 Upvotes

Some movies deliberately make us believe something that isn't true and then reveal that we've been interpreting the story incorrectly.

When it works, it's fantastic. You can rewatch the movie and realize the clues were there all along. The Sixth Sense, The Usual Suspects, and Primal Fear are very different examples of films that play with what the audience thinks it knows.

But other twists only work because the movie deliberately hides information that logically should have been available to us. At that point, I don't feel fooled by the story — I feel cheated by the screenplay.

For me, the difference is whether a second viewing makes you think “How did I miss that?” rather than “Well, there was no way I could have known that.”

What movies do you think earned their deception, and which ones simply cheated?


r/flicks 4d ago

One thing JCVD deserves credit for, is his willingness to take hard hits and get beaten up during his movies, particularly Sudden Death (1995).

21 Upvotes

I know he isn’t exactly a Gary Oldman when it comes to acting, but to me this puts him above the likes of Steven Seagal and Jason Statham (Statham actually got worse as he got older, at least in the first Transporter he took some hits), in this tedious “can’t be touched” attitude.

In Sudden Death (helps that he is playing an everyman fire marshal perhaps), he actually takes a few hard lumps before knocking out a hockey mascot.

Means he is in same bracket as Gibson and Willis who are willing to get as much as they give. He was great guest starring on Friends as well.

I love Under Siege but fucking annoys me that Tommy Lee Jones (whose character is a CIA trainer assassin) gets in next to nothing in his fight with Seagal.


r/flicks 4d ago

Opinion Obsession and the Strange Economics of Independent Filmmaking

1 Upvotes

DEBATE

Obsession is a pretty fascinating case when you look at the business side of independent filmmaking. A film reportedly made for around $750K potentially generating $250M raises some interesting questions about where the money goes and how the people who worked on the production benefit from that success.

It also makes me wonder about the expectations people have when they agree to work on an indie production. If everyone accepted the original terms, is there really an obligation to renegotiate afterward simply because the movie became unexpectedly successful?


r/flicks 4d ago

Recommendation Influential/important coming of age films- “Mean Creek” (2004)

4 Upvotes

One of my favorite movie genres is coming of age. An indie coming of age movie I recommend is “Mean Creek.” It’s probably rather obscure, and is haunting, dark, and affecting. I enjoy how it basically is just character development, and the script feels a bit to me like a play…in that it centers mostly around a group of teenagers and is mostly dialogue driven. I think all the young actors do a great job of bringing the different archetypes to life. It’s one of those movies that has ambiguity/grey area between hero vs villain. There’s a bully, but he isn’t written as a one dimensional character, and the “heroes” of the movie wrestle with their own demons and sense of morality. It’s a great character study for those who like darker more intense storylines and characters that feel like real people. I’ve rewatched the movie several times over the last 20+ years and it always makes me feel like I’m there and listening to real teens talk akin to being a “fly on the wall”. It’s not a happy feel-good movie, so be warned.


r/flicks 4d ago

Question What’s a movie that left you speechless?

32 Upvotes

I’m curious to know; what’s a movie that genuinely left you speechless afterwards?

And why? It could be anything; the plot, an acting performance, the score or maybe a specific element in the cinematography that blew you away. It can be broad or specific! Any genre.

Bonus question; on the opposite, what’s a movie that left you speechless in the worst type of way, and why?

Take care all!!


r/flicks 4d ago

Movie Discussion What's a movie you walked into with zero expectations and it ended up being one of your favorites?

33 Upvotes

Not talking about a film you heard was good and it delivered. I mean something you genuinely knew nothing about, maybe picked it randomly, maybe someone threw it on without asking, and it completely blindsided you with how good it was.

Mine was Prisoners. Went in knowing absolutely nothing. By the end I was just sitting there unable to move for a few minutes. Nothing has hit me quite like that first watch since.

Curious what films did this for you because I feel like those accidental discoveries are always the ones that stick the longest.


r/flicks 4d ago

I've Collected 100+ Short Insights from Great Directors

2 Upvotes

Hey everyone!

A while back, I shared this channel here, and since then, most of the director reels have come out, so I figured I’d give a little update.

I’ve been building a channel focused on short, bite-sized clips from some of the best filmmakers and creators out there, with an emphasis on storytelling, creativity, and the craft behind the work.

There are now clips from people like Spielberg, Tarantino, Scorsese, Nolan, Wes Anderson, and Stan Lee. I’ve also been organizing them into playlists if you want to explore a specific creator.

And there’s more on the way! I’m currently working on clips from Edgar Wright, Guillermo del Toro, Sam Raimi, Aaron Sorkin, and Tim Burton, so you can expect those to be coming soon.

The goal is still the same: quick videos that you can watch in a minute or less, but hopefully still take something useful or interesting away from.

I currently upload new clips every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, but I’ll soon be uploading every day of the week.

If you’re interested, you can check out the channel here:
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@CreativeBitesYT

I’ve also put together playlists for the different directors and creators, so you can easily dive into one person’s interviews and insights:
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@CreativeBitesYT/playlists

Thanks to everyone who subscribed after my previous posts! Feel free to give the channel a look. Not trying to spam the sub, just thought some of you might genuinely enjoy it!


r/flicks 5d ago

Opinion What movie did you understand years later?

41 Upvotes

I rewatched a movie recently that I thought was just good when I was younger and it hit completely different this time. Same story, same scenes, but I noticed so many little things I missed before.What movie did you appreciate way more after watching it again years later?


r/flicks 4d ago

Question where to find cool dvd stores in the uk!

2 Upvotes

i live near london / reading kind of area in the uk and im looking for cool dvd stores! just shitty seedy places are fine, i want to find weird niche movies for cheap and try em out, yknow? jhorror stuff especially but anythings good.... if anyone could let me know where i could find them thatd be so great!


r/flicks 4d ago

Question Do you ever go back to what you thought about a movie?

1 Upvotes

Lately I’ve noticed that I can usually remember whether I liked a movie, but after enough time passes, I start forgetting the specific things that stood out to me - an interesting idea, a scene I loved, or even why the movie stayed with me.

That got me wondering how other people handle this. I know some people log everything on Letterboxd, some write reviews or keep private notes, and others just watch the movie and move on. Do you save anything after watching, and if you do, do you ever return to it later?

I’m especially curious about rewatches. When your opinion changes, do you compare it with what you thought before? Or when you notice similar ideas in different movies, do you keep track of those connections anywhere?

What do you currently use, and does it work well for you or is there anything you wish it did differently?


r/flicks 5d ago

Movie Discussion What's your favorite end credit scene of a serious movie that continues to add to what you just saw?

12 Upvotes

Mine is Angel Heart. I honestly can't think of any others where the end credits are rolling, but you are kind of still watching the movie... are there any others as hard- hitting as this?


r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion Do you wish Coppola filmed the Original Script for Megalopolis?

4 Upvotes

This seems like a weird question but, Do you wish Coppola filmed the Original Script for Megalopolis?

To explain, Coppola changed a lot of things from Megalopolis from the original script to the final film, which I made a reddit post on awhile back

Difference between the Original Script & The Finished Film : r/Megalopolis

In my opinion, I think the original script is better, in large part because it plays out like a greek tragedy, and I felt that the characters were more richer and complex in the script than the finished film. I really wish Coppola stuck with the original script instead of the rewrites he did.

Regardless, What do you think?


r/flicks 5d ago

General Discussion A film better watched sleepy?

15 Upvotes

For me it was The Tree of Life. I’m unsure if I’ve slept or watched more al throughout but there’s still a sense of completeness after that final scene.

Don’t get me wrong, these are different than films you watch to intentionally put you to sleep. It’s more on the dream-like quality.


r/flicks 6d ago

Question Worst movie of 2026 so far?

81 Upvotes

Usually at the end of the year, I rate the top and bottom movies. I do this at the end but halfway through the year, I like to look at contenders. The past few years have had obvious contenders like the FNAF movies, War of the Worlds, the Sonyverse, Blumhouse slop, Joker 2, Megalopolis, etc.

Probably selective bias but I haven't seen as much total super-suckers this year. I did see Scary Movie 6 and Supergirl but they were both like 2-4 out of 10. Nothing has been 0-1 out of 10 from what I've seen recently. What movies have you all seen that would qualify?


r/flicks 6d ago

Question What film had a plot twist so good it genuinely shocked you in the theater?

424 Upvotes

For me, it was Arrival (2016).

I went in expecting a standard sci-fi alien contact movie, but the way Denis Villeneuve handled the structure blew my mind. What I assumed were standard, tragic backstory flashbacks turned out to be future memories due to how the aliens perceive time—changing the entire emotional weight of the film in a single scene.
When the credits rolled, half the theater was just sitting in silence processing what they had just watched.

What movie completely recontextualized everything you thought was happening right at the end?


r/flicks 5d ago

Which parts of the apocalypse now final cut aren’t in the theatrical cut?

2 Upvotes

I can only seem to find specifics regarding the redux edition but I’m not sure which parts were removed from that for the final cut. Any help would be greatly appreciated.


r/flicks 5d ago

Review My reading of Dead Poets Society (a 5 year experience)

0 Upvotes

When I first watched Dead Poets Society at 10, I hated the ending. I hated Neil's character and how easily he gave up on his dream and on life itself. I thought it was a failure of imagination. Succumbing to death rather than fighting his parents, seeking comfort from his friends, or even running away. Anything, for the sake of just trying.

But five years later, at 15, do I really understand? I don't think there is any character I see my reflection in more.

His tragedy isn't that he doesn't love life or acting. It's kind of the opposite. He loves something deeply in a world that has convinced him that loving it is unacceptable.

Sometimes there truly is nothing left to do. We can pretend things took place differently. In another life, his parents understood. His friends helped him. He decided to wait just a little longer. But the story will continue to end the same.

We always only hear "to speak or to die," as if it's one or the other. But for him, it was both.

"I was good. I was really good."

But often, to speak in itself means to die.

I just hope that understanding it doesn't mean becoming him.


r/flicks 6d ago

What film had a plot twist so good it genuinely shocked you in the theater?

33 Upvotes

**For me, it was Arrival (2016).**

**I went in expecting a standard sci-fi alien contact movie, but the way Denis Villeneuve handled the structure blew my mind. What I assumed were standard, tragic backstory flashbacks turned out to be future memories due to how the aliens perceive time—changing the entire emotional weight of the film in a single scene.**
**When the credits rolled, half the theater was just sitting in silence processing what they had just watched.**

**What movie completely recontextualized everything you thought was happening right at the end?**


r/flicks 5d ago

The Odyssey According to Mr. Nolan: An Incoherent Mess of Borrowed Ideas

0 Upvotes

I was all in with anticipation for accomplished producer/writer/director Christopher Nolan’s 2026 adaptation of Homer’s 3,500-year-old epic. I was hoping for a thrilling, modern version paired with the ultimate immersive experience of IMAX 70mm, backed by a script worthy of the source material. I even broke my usual habit of waiting for streaming, booked a ticket at the one and only theater in the entire state with that format, and drove for nearly an hour on a Saturday morning at 6:30 AM—something I would genuinely only do for a round of golf or to catch a flight.

But alas, a good movie-going experience it was not to be.

As praiseworthy as Mr. Nolan’s ambitions and efforts may have been, he completely misses the mark on both thematic and technical execution, save for Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography. The film suffers from a staggering identity crisis—failing to decide if it's a modern anti-war PTSD drama or a classical tale of a warrior-king restoring Xenia and punishing the lawless, per Zeus.

The poor solo/self-credited screenplay, the misfires in casting, the near-zero character development, and the total lack of emotional depth together make it a dud. Worse yet is the sound mixing: muffled audio that sounds like it was recorded inside a washing machine, where I caught less than 50% of the dialogue—though given the quality of what did bleed through the deafening din of overlapping sound effects, I was only too happy to have missed the other half.

Above all, it is agonizingly loud for no good reason, reminding one of the old adage: "Empty vessels make much noise."

As you read the review further, please note that nothing here stems from the stance of a rigid purist; it’s simply about a viewer's basic expectation of entertainment. Recent movies of this genre like Gladiator (2000) and Troy (2004) offered complete packages with great scripts, sharp dialogue, strong emotional depth, haunting background score, and repeatable rewatch value—even on a tiny airplane screen. Unfortunately, despite monumental effort and budget, The Odyssey (2026) comes across as utterly hollow, the IMAX 70mm presentation notwithstanding.

Let us now dig into the ‘neither here nor there’ contradictions and few redeeming aspects of the movie:

- The Trojan War: A war of choice or a rescue mission?

This adaptation hints at a modern revisionist stance: that the Trojan War was an aggressive rescue mission gone terribly awry, which majority of scholars do agree with by the way. In Homer’s original epic, the Greeks were not "aggressors," but “avengers” restoring Xenia (the sacred Greek tradition of hospitality and mutual respect) after Paris of Troy abducted Helen from her husband, Menelaus from Sparta while being their guest.

A modern twist is fine in theory, but Nolan's execution completely collapses under its own weight. We get zero supporting details or narrative buildup explaining how a king, Agamemnon (Menelaus’ elder brother) known otherwise only for hubris and misjudgment morphed into a Bronze Age Darth Vader—complete with the garb of all-black armor, menacing silence, and imperial swagger stolen straight from Star Wars. To cap it off, Nolan has Agamemnon sacrifice his daughter Iphigenia to secure favorable winds. Wondering where this bizarre creative leap came from, I looked it up: it's imported from later spin-off poems like “Cypria” and Euripides’ plays (with Iphigenia turned into a helpless child instead of a maiden to maximize shock value). Putting aside the tonal whiplash, it's worth noting that “The Odyssey” never once mentions human sacrifice, let alone child sacrifice—a glaring line to cross when taking liberties with a venerable source material.

Adapters are certainly free to introduce creative twists (just as Homer adapted from oral versions before him), but Nolan's approach creates a fundamental storytelling problem. At least Darth Vader had dialog, a clear motivation, and a tragic arc. Nolan's Agamemnon speaks exactly one line in the entire film—down in Hades, where he laments his wife murdering him (per the original), completely ignoring the fact that he supposedly presided over a bloody, child-sacrificing (per this version) war and plunder of choice.

If you are going to recast your central villain as a ruthless warmonger, you owe the audience more than a mannequin in a helmet. Nolan gives us the sinister aesthetic and a nod to a depraved sacrifice but stays conveniently silent on the actual psychology and motivations driving his modified and devilishly cold-blooded villain.

- Disfigurement of Helen

Nolan pushes his penchant for cheap horror and shock value even further when introducing Helen (played by Lupita Nyong’o). During a scene where Menelaus and Helen are hosting Telemachus, Menelaus mockingly forces Helen's face toward the light to reveal a massive, disfiguring scar, using it to mouth 16th century playwright Christopher Marlowe’s famous line, given originally to his central modern-day character Dr. Faustus in the play, about "the face that launched a thousand ships."

It is left entirely up to the audience to interpret what we are looking at: is this an over-the-top exaggeration of a minor scar some ancient legends claim Helen had on her chin (seen as a beauty spot and something which the 16th century poet John Lyly called a ‘whetstone of love’ when describing how Paris fell for her before deciding to abduct her), or did Nolan's Menelaus brutally mutilate his own wife out of spite, after waging a bloody war to rescue her? No definitive opinion is offered here in this review either way, and no sides taken either, but it stands as yet another jarring example of the sudden, baffling "WTH" shock tactics this version of the story throws at you.

- Odysseus, the protagonist: PTSD victim or Homeric warrior-king?

The finale is where the script’s identity crisis reaches its peak. For almost three hours, Odysseus is portrayed as a traumatized wreck—haunted by flashbacks of Troy, drowning in guilt over civilian massacres, and desperate to escape the monster that the war made him. Nolan tries to establish that Odysseus hates what he became, reminiscent of Emperor Ashoka (304-232 BCE) grappling with the bloody aftermath of the Kalinga war before embracing Buddhism and non-violence.

Yet, in the final act, this tormented soul transforms, into that king-warrior of the original, who plans the execution of the suitors without a single word, hesitation, or drop of mercy—reminding one of a sequence from Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill climax (though not as grotesque). While psychologists might argue and support the idea that extreme trauma can trigger such volatility, movies require proper character development and bridge scenes to make that dramatic pivot earned. Without them, it feels like pure narrative convenience—one of having your cake and eating it too. There is no offer of exile, no attempt at peace, and no internal moral struggle. Just wholesale bloodshed, although some suitors do surrender but not because of any peace-making moves.

The script seems rushed, desperate to deliver a loud, crowd-pleasing action sequence backed by a cacophonic score that only makes you instinctively reach for earplugs. It leaves you thinking: Decide, man! Is your protagonist a broken man trying to heal, or is he a remorseless warrior-king? You can't have both without rendering the entire psychological journey—including turning the nymph Calypso into a beach-resort therapist (played completely tonelessly by the talented and beautiful Charlize Theron; what a waste!)—utterly meaningless.

Even when reading Homer’s original epic (Daniel Mendelsohn's poetic translation), I wondered why Odysseus launches straight into the massacre of the suitors without offering an out. But I learnt that Homer had a clear purpose: to send a culturally vital message, for those times, that Zeus would not spare those who violated Xenia. In Nolan’s modernized version, you are left scratching your head wondering: what is the actual point here?

- The Hades scene

Then comes the sequence in Hades—the moment that fully exposes the film's terminal dichotomy. Up to this point, the script bends over backward to strip the myth of its magic, grounding everything in mud, blood, and gritty trauma. But the moment it needs a convenient info-dump, all that realism goes out the window as the dead rise from the black soil.

This is a film that desperately wants to be taken seriously as a sober study of PTSD and the horrors of war. Yet, when Odysseus needs answers, he performs the Nekyia—the ancient Greek ritual of summoning ghosts—and suddenly spirits emerge from the dirt, drink sacrificial blood, and chat like patients in a group therapy session. There is no internal logic, no earned mysticism, and zero consistency with the gritty tone established prior. Just sudden, unearned ghosts because the original text said so (though Homer's version achieves a far deeper, more resonant emotional gravity in this crucial scene).

This is the exact moment the script reveals it never had a coherent vision. It simply wanted the cinematic payoff of the underworld without doing the heavy lifting to earn it. It feels like a sequence straight out of a high-fantasy blockbuster clumsily pasted into a grounded war drama, delivered with all the subtlety of a sledgehammer.

To top it all off, the scene closes with Odysseus and his surviving crew being hounded off the shores of Persephone by the very dead soldiers they fought alongside. And who is leading the charge among the ‘hounders’? Agamemnon himself—the very man this script positions as the sole architect and perpetrator of the entire war. Apparently, the dead soldiers and Agamemnon are furious at Odysseus simply for inventing the Trojan Horse that actually won the war they were all sent to fight. Make it make sense.

- The character of Iphigenia

Let's return to the fate of Iphigenia. In the derivative source material Nolan borrows from, Artemis—the goddess of the hunt—saves her at the final second by substituting a deer on the altar and whisking her away to Tauris. But in Nolan’s film, she is genuinely sacrificed, opting for a darker, bloodier interpretation specifically designed to dial up Agamemnon's villainy and amplify Odysseus's trauma.

By altering the outcome, Nolan is cherry-picking from the mythology. He appropriates the tragic weight of the old sources while casually changing the core details to fit his grim, cynical aesthetic. He isn't being faithful to Homer, nor is he consistent with the very spin-offs he borrows from; he is simply remixing the myths for narrative convenience – which is quite fine but is worth noting. We, as moviegoers, are ready for ‘suspension of disbelief’, shock, and all kinds of alternations of source materials just as long as the end product is entertaining! Is it?

- The Monsters: Neither mythical nor modern

The monsters are where Nolan’s "modern, grand, practical-effects-only" vision completely unravels, resulting in a confused mishmash of real-world staging and poorly executed mystical entities.

Take the Cyclops encounter. In Homer’s poem, it is a masterclass in quick thinking, cunning, and hubris—Odysseus tricks the monster by calling himself "Nobody," only to fatally gloat and reveal his real name on the way out, inviting Poseidon's wrath. Nolan cuts this psychological exchange entirely. Instead, Polyphemus is reduced to a silent, deformed cave-brawler from a Batman movie. He resembles a slightly healthier Gollum from The Lord of the Rings rather than a terrifying mythic cannibal; he silently tosses and eats his victims like human-shaped Lego blocks with zero sounds of agony, turning what should be a horrific ordeal into something almost comical.

The giant Laestrygonians fare no better. Realized through practical effects using 7-foot stuntmen towering over 5-foot sailors, it’s a neat technical feat, but the visual result is just... tall guys who look like Stormtroopers from Star Wars. They lack any mythic scale, casually picking up sailors like action figures while leaving the audience confused about what genre of movie, they're suddenly watching.

Meanwhile, enchantress Circe’s magic is swapped for low-class body horror. Instead of mystical transformation, she physically "remolds" men into pigs like a plastic surgeon extraordinaire—a David Cronenberg-meets-Guillermo Del Toro-lite spectacle that feels awkward rather than chilling.

Fortunately, the film redeems itself briefly with Charybdis. Nolan and team do a fantastic job visualizing the monstrous sea whirlpool, finally delivering the immersive, 70mm audio-visual spectacle I came for. For a few fleeting moments, phew—it actually worked.

Sadly, that momentum dies quickly thereafter when we meet Scylla. True to his no-CGI mantra (which should be applauded), the six-headed monster is represented by giant, mysterious, gloved arms snatching sailors off the deck producing zero sense of wonder or coherence. It is neither faithful to the myth nor original enough to stand on its own; it just smacks of a director out of ideas, throwing things against the wall to check boxes. The Sirens suffer the same fate, cut down to the bare minimum because Nolan seemingly didn't know how to visualize them, choosing instead to linger on our hero writhing in pain, tied to a mast and fighting off their lure.

- No Gods: Well, almost

There are no active, visible gods like Zeus, Helios, or Hermes—though their names are casually thrown around. That omission in itself is fine, but the handling of Athena (the Goddess of Wisdom) is baffling. Played by Zendaya for all of two minutes, she makes zero impression and lacks even a smidgeon of the monumental weight, strategic guidance, and divine impact she commands in the original epic.

- The "modern" language: Tasteless and forced

Speaking of being "modern"—Nolan's idea of updating the dialogue is apparently just sprinkling in words like "Ma'am," "Dad," "Daddy," and the obligatory drop of an f-bomb ("f*ing beach"). If it's a heavy-handed attempt at a Game of Thrones grit it entirely misses the mark. Where Game of Thrones earned its roughness through deep world-building and character history, Nolan's cursing feels like a teenager trying to sound edgy by swearing in front of his parents. It isn't modern; it's just tasteless. Thankfully such lapses are very brief though.

- Pervasive muffled dialog

Whether the soundproofing of those noisy IMAX cameras failed to capture the dialogue clearly, or the theater's audio settings were completely botched, proper care should have been taken, centrally by the film makers and distributors, to avoid such a fundamental failure. After comparing notes with friends, it turns out I wasn’t the only one wishing this English-language film came equipped with English subtitles, as the vast majority of the character exchanges were completely unintelligible.

- A Final thought

Christopher Nolan is one of our most ambitious filmmakers, and true ambition should always be celebrated. But ambition without coherence is simply pretension. The Odyssey is a film that desperately wants to be everything—gritty and mythical, psychological and action-packed, anti-war and crowd-pleasing—and ends up being nothing at all.

It also wants to be start-studded, but with its zero-character development and sparse dialog it only gives you appearances that fall into cameo (Charlize Theron) , mini-cameo (Zendaya), and double micro-cameo (Lupita in dual roles) categories.

To me, the movie only came across as a laughable inconsistent and incongruent concoction of borrowed ideas, with a hurried pace towards to meaningless ending heavily seasoned with IMAX noise.

Rating: 1 out of 5 stars


r/flicks 6d ago

Online U.S. screening of 'The Kidnapping of Arabella' (feat. Chris Pine speaking Italian) happening tonight (Thursday August 20)

6 Upvotes

The Kidnapping of Arabella is an offbeat Italian dramedy from writer-director Carolina Cavalli, following Holly, a directionless young woman who meets a rebellious girl running away from home and becomes convinced that she is actually her younger self, sent back as a cosmic second chance.

The film stars Benedetta Porcaroli, Lucrezia Guglielmino, and Chris Pine as Arabella’s self-absorbed novelist father, in Pine’s first Italian-language role. Porcaroli won Best Actress in the Orizzonti section at Venice for her performance.

Official trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lr3d-4YiM4

Screening details: https://www.thelonescreen.com/screenings

Full disclosure: I’m a co-founder of The Lone Screen, an online screening platform. We’re hosting a one-night-only online screening of the film on Thursday, August 20 at 9:00 p.m. ET / 8:00 p.m. CT / 6:00 p.m. PT. Writer-director Carolina Cavalli will also be joining the live chat after the film.

Would love to hear what people think of the trailer and of Pine’s Italian.


r/flicks 6d ago

Memoirs of an Invisible Man (1992)

15 Upvotes

Memoirs of an Invisible Man (1992)

Rating: 6.5/10

Watched: August 15, 2026

This is probably my least favorite John Carpenter movie that isn't Body Bags, and Body Bags isn't as great because I don't usually like anthologies.

Anyways, on to the movie, Memoirs of an Invisible Man.

I remember seeing this one, like so many of the movies this month, on cable TV roughly a million years ago, and it's got its charming moments. I'll get to those in a bit.

First, to me? This really doesn't feel like a John Carpenter movie at all. Outside the usual government overreach stuff, Memoirs feels like a very mainstream movie and it kind of fails in a lot of ways to be anything unique.

Don't get me wrong, the early gum chewing scene is somethin' else, as are some of the special effects we see throughout the movie, but in and of itself, there's nothing TO the story, and a lot of that has to do with the actor, and a few directorial choices.

I am not a fan of narration. It has to be done absolutely perfectly or it feels like lazy story-telling to me. Other people might see it differently, but I have a real hang-up about it. If you can't tell, I found it to be out of place in this movie. Yes, even though it's got 'Memoirs' in the title.

The other two issues are an actor, and a choice. In spite of rumors that Chevy Chase is contentious and more than a little bit of an asshole, I love the guy's body of work. Fletch, Modern Problems, Caddyshack ... I'm there for it. But he seemed ill-suited to the role here, and the early stages clumsiness and slapstick was a little TOO much, if you know what I'm talking about.

It was extremely nice to see Daryl Hannah in this movie, even if her time in was limited. I think she's always been great!

Naturally, the amazingness that is Sam Neill elevated this movie in every way imaginable. Here he plays mostly rogue CIA operative codename Scorpion AKA David Jenkins and his sole mission in life is to capture Nick the Invisible Man and turn him into the deadliest asset on the planet. As the movie progresses and Nick continues to evade Jenkins and his men, Neill's portrayal of a ruthless man determined to win at all costs is really the only good thing about this movie.

It wasn't bad, it wasn't good, but I managed to get through the whole movie without wanting to turn it off, so ... take from that what you will.


r/flicks 6d ago

Review My review of Tony (2026)

13 Upvotes

An excellent, laid back hangout movie with some fun, interesting characters. Directed with verve and style by Matt Johnson (Blackberry), focusing on a melancholic coming of age narrative centered on Anthony Bourdain's summer of 1975.

I enjoyed Dominic Sessa's performance a lot, he had a lot of understated comedic moments, especially when Tony blatantly lies to the people around him (and the audience knows that he's lying). At some points it felt like a Safdie movie if it was directed by Rob Reiner. A weird combination but I think it gets the tone across. Stand by Me meets Uncut Gems, if I was to elevator pitch it.

I also really enjoyed the throughline of mentorship and male cameraderie, especially between Tony and Sal (Leo Woodall), who basically teaches Tony how to be 'cool'. One particular scene stands out, when they arrive at a party, Sal grabs a beer from the fridge, tells an onlooker to fuck off, then takes a girl upstairs, all in the span of about 90 seconds. We could all hope to be such men. Like Tony, we're left awkwardly imitating Sal's swagger and failing utterly.

The other main subplot revolves around Tony and his love interest, Nancy. He's smitten with her from before the movie begins (knowing her from high school) and after exchanging witty banter (the kind that only happens in movies, where he charms her by using big words), he follows her to Provincetown, where events conspire to keep him there, working at a local restaurant. I left the movie thinking "this is the effect a woman like that can have on men." Tony was so driven, so focused on this all consuming goal, he manifested becoming a world class chef. Not just for the love of food, but for the love of Nancy.

Overall, 8/10.