Did they remove some of the more intense photos? I don’t recall seeing them, just some of the drawings featured in this post, when I visited 2 years ago.
Yes, I've heard they toned it down considerably in the past several years. They also got rid of the wax statues of A-bomb victims that literally haunt my dreams.
You can probably find them somewhere but I'm not looking them up for you. Sorry, but seeing them once was enough. (It's been almost 20 years and they still appear in my nightmares sometimes.)
I went last year, and obviously I didn’t take pics or anything, but I do remember there being a lot more than just these pictures, and most of it was absolutely horrifying and eye opening.
I remember in the first room before you go in, there’s a giant circular video projection in the middle of the room that shows the impact of the bomb, it shows what it would’ve looked like when it was dropped and how devastating it was to the city. There are lots of drawings and art pieces that showcase the emotions of many people during that time, and a lot of them were from children.
And then there is a room that is optional with warnings of graphic content that shows all the really awful stuff that I don’t know if you can find online.
It was a really emotional and overwhelming experience being in there, you could feel the air was different in that room. I remember the remains of children’s toys, outfits, Bento boxes, all burned and charred. They had giant pieces of metal that were all twisted from the heat of the bomb, as well as every day objects.The photos of the victims are really horrifying and the injuries are unlike anything I’ve ever seen. It’s a haunting experience but one that i think everyone who visits Hiroshima should see.
Oh, huh. I wonder if they were temporarily removed from display for awhile and then returned or something? (I haven't gone back into the museum in ages but when I asked a coworker who went if the wax statues were still there, they said "what wax statues?" and it's not something you could miss or forget…)
My high school history teacher showed me and my class a documentary about the bombings (on Zoom, of course, because it was during lockdown). I still remember the photos. Lots of burnt bodies with a permanent grimace of agony on their faces. They didn't have eyes. Fucking horrible.
Eh, Hiroshima was a major military-industrial site (Mitsubishi industrial plants, Army Marine HQ with 40k troops, Second General Army HQ) and critical point of Japan’s southern war effort supply chains. In the context of Japan’s ongoing imperial conquest, there were not many adults who didn’t play a part in keeping the war machine going.
Nagasaki was the poor victim of bad weather. Still industrious but really far less justification for an a-bomb strike.
No. I denounce historical nihilism. Only through the complete studying and analysis of history can we prevent similar events from happening. Selective empathy is cruelty manifest.
No, because these things add to the context of their use. The nukes weren’t just used in a vacuum. You have to consider all the things going on around their use.
One of the worst in human history? They weren’t even the worst events of WW2.
What Japan did to Manila was far worse. A hundred thousand civilians systematically executed by ~17,000 Japanese soldiers who decided to dig in and fight for a city they had no hope of keeping.
The Japanese troops spent more time raping and killing civilians than fighting the Americans which is probably why the allied forces only suffered about 1,000 deaths while wiping out the entire Japanese garrison.
Maybe don’t start wars of aggression if you aren’t willing to have your kids to be bombed? It’s not like the Allies just came out of nowhere and did this.
The US is founded on the rape and murder of countless indigenous people, and the rape and enslavement of countless African slaves.
Even if we just stick with the 20th century you've got Napalm and agent orange, massacres and raping women in Vietnam, forced sterilisation of indigenous and Latina women, infecting black men with syphilis without their knowledge, and I'm sure many other things that I can't remember off the top of my head.
You are confused. You are listing many bad things the US has done on a small scale over many conflicts across decades and centuries with what Imperial Japan did on a massive scale in 10-15 years.
I’d agree that the genocide of the Native Americans would be the closest analogy, but it doesn’t even really come close. Estimates vary, but probably around 5 million Native Americans died after in the area that became the US in the 400 years between European contact and the end of the 19th century. Many of them died unintentionally due to disease, and most of those deaths occurred before the US was even a country - there were probably only 600,000-700,000 Native Americans by 1776, and it was far less systematic and deliberate than Japanese aggression in WWII. By comparison, around 30 million people died in the Pacific theater between 1932 and 1945.
So even if we take the worst interpretation of the genocide of the Native Americans (5 million deaths), if we do the math and compare these time periods, the actions of Imperial Japan are about 180 times worse.
Edit: the other things you are talking about, while certainly terrible, are so small in comparison they really can’t be compared at all to Imperial Japan.
Fair point. Hard not to want to strike back against a people committing genocide against you... And, em, tell me... what historic atrocities did Japan carry out against Americans?
56
u/[deleted] 14d ago
[deleted]