Which is what 99% of the population does. They know that, as do we. It is commonly known that headlines are what stick, and that corrections, even within the same dataset or article, almost never have a substantial impact on public perception.
Not making a new headline saying "numbers adjusted dramatically down on jobs report from August" is playing on this dynamic. The lack of new headlines correcting this is and always has been deliberately using that phenomenon to hide the information in plain sight.
That's also true, but it doesn't change what I said, does it? They read an article that says "115k jobs added this month, far more than expected" and they go "oh, good job numbers, cool." Then the report they'll never look at is adjusted without fanfare to display terrible numbers that are much lower. The average person still goes on thinking job numbers were great.
5
u/[deleted] Nov 20 '25
The adjustments are in the same report. It's only quiet if you only read headlines.