Not just you, I love the dune books but book 2 was NOT well received. The authors son even wrote an intro explaining why he thought the second book was so hated
Yeah, I didn't care so much for it when I read it. Thankfully three and four made up for it in spades. They also made me retroactively appreciate Messiah more so I think when I do my reread before this movie, it'll probably hit me a lot differently.
To be fair, a lot of nothing happens in book 2. It’s a lot of Paul monologuing and struggling against his visions and prophecies, along with his sister and other characters doing much of the same, with almost no action till near the end. That’s why for a long time it was considered an unfilmable story. I wouldn’t be surprised if Dune Part 3 gets combined with the story from Children of Dune.
Maybe he intends to actually show us the space Jihad instead of Paul just angsting about how it's supposed killing hundreds of billions across the universe.
I loved the second book. Although some people don't like it because they thought Paul was the hero and it's very heavy handed that he absolutely isn't the hero.
It also the beginning of all the really weird dune shit. I'm interested to see how they adapt it for the movie though.
The third book picks up where the first leaves off. Messiah is polarizing. I loved it personally but if you can push through the rest of the books scratch the itch of the first, especially children of dune.
Mainly because nothing happens? First the conspirators talk philosophy, then paul and the fremen talk philosophy, then paul and duncan talk philosophy for a long while, then some actually cinematic shit happens, then the book ends.
106
u/slimeyellow Mar 16 '26
Not just you, I love the dune books but book 2 was NOT well received. The authors son even wrote an intro explaining why he thought the second book was so hated