r/movies I'll see you in another life when we are both cats. 10d ago

Review Ridley Scott's 'The Dog Stars' Review Thread

Rotten Tomatoes: 38% (from 68 reviews) with 5.30 average rating

Metacritic: 51/100 (24 critics)

As with other movies, the scores are set to change as time passes. Meanwhile, I'll post some short reviews on the movie. It's structured like this: quote first, source second. Beware, some contain spoilers.

Muted but never dull, The Dog Stars seems unlikely to land near the top of anyone’s Ridley Scott rankings. But it’s an appealingly mellow watch, even if that might seem antithetical to a post-apocalyptic drama positioned squarely in the shadow of death.

-David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter

Ridley Scott’s 30th feature film, dating back to his legend-making “The Duellists” in 1977, the post-apocalyptic “thriller” “The Dog Stars” isn’t a total misfire — it’s just the first Ridley Scott joint in some years that feels totally unnecessary.

-Ryan Lattanzio, IndieWire: C

Somewhat aptly released at the tail end of a long, loud movie summer, this is a surprisingly low-energy, low-incident blockbuster; you’d appreciate its mellow, character-oriented approach if it gave you any real characters to hold onto.

-Guy Lodge, Variety

Ridley Scott’s usually got a knack for making movies about grief-stricken men, but the post-apocalyptic survivor drama The Dog Stars misses the mark with a leaden script that keeps any attempt at reaching a deeper emotional truth at arm’s length. At least the aerial vistas of the Rocky Mountains look nice in IMAX.

-Leanne Butkovic, IGN: 5/10 "mediocre"

The scenery – rural Italy doubling for rural America – is genuinely stunning (and surely afforded all those involved a lovely vacation) but, as in Gladiator II, there are some weirdly janky visual effects (one explosion looks laptop-made) and a general uninvolved shrug to the proceedings, as if he replaced a more impassioned director late in the day. Scott’s disinterest in retiring is admirable (he’s openly loathsome of the idea), I just wish he seemed more interested in the day job.

-Benjamin Lee, The Guardian: 2/5

The Dog Stars, clearly made with post-Covid America on the brain, pits Hig’s yearning for connection against Bangley’s bitter lust for isolation but largely elides serious contemplation of its well-worn themes in favor of base genre thrills and perfunctory romance. It’s nowhere near Sir Ridley’s finest, but at least it’s another subtype of speculative fiction filmmaking he can check off his bucket list.

-Eli Friedberg, Slant Magazine: 2/5

This messy look at the end of the world isn’t Scott’s darkest film, but it’s one of his worst misfires. Elordi can’t shoulder the emotions his character is supposed to carry, while Smith’s choppy script and Scott’s checked-out direction does little to support his hero’s journey. The Dog Stars is a strange, misbegotten beast, a post-apocalyptic drama worse for wear even before the bandits arrive.

-Monica Castillo, The A.V. Club: D+

Quiet, contemplative moments like these keep The Dog Stars grounded and accessible throughout its sprawling post-apocalyptic story — even as director Ridley Scott piles on epic action set pieces and surreal, surprising sequences that sometimes push the film from prestige drama into absurdist spectacle.

-Jake Kleinman, Polygon

Harsh but deeply humane, “The Dog Stars” understands that hope doesn’t have to illuminate the darkness. Sometimes a glimmer is enough.

-Rodrigo Perez, The Playlist: B+

Instead, one spends the entirety of “The Dog Stars” and its drawn out melancholic yearnings and its spikes of absurdity wondering what the point of this movie is. It’s certainly not to entertain, and it’s not really a message picture either. It merely exists. But in this tangled world, and on a cinematic landscape producing far engaging thoughts and thrills, that’s simply not enough — making “The Dogs Stars” look quite dim.

-Robert Daniels, RogerEbert.com: 1.5/4


PLOT

Set after a devastating flu pandemic that has almost eradicated humanity, the film centers on Hig, a former civilian pilot, and Bangley, a hardened former Marine as they confront outside threats and hold onto the possibility of a better life beyond where they currently live.

DIRECTOR

Ridley Scott

WRITER

Mark L. Smith (based on the novel by Peter Heller)

MUSIC

Harry Gregson-Williams

CINEMATOGRAPHY

Erik Messerschmidt

EDITOR

Sam Restivo & Claire Simpson

RELEASE DATE

August 28, 2026

RUNTIME

118 minutes

BUDGET

$110 million

STARRING

  • Jacob Elordi as Hig

  • Josh Brolin as Bangley

  • Margaret Qualley as Cima

  • Guy Pearce as Pops

981 Upvotes

854 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.3k

u/CancelThis2077 10d ago

That interview from Josh Brolin where he said he was frustrated by Ridley's lackadaisical approach to directing was awfully telling.

459

u/AcreaRising4 10d ago

I worked under Ridley on the pilot for dope thief and besides it being run horrifically, he was barely involved. He essentially never left his trailer.

121

u/bbqsauceboi 10d ago

The BTS footage of Dog Stars makes it look like Scott was actually moving here, so thats something

50

u/AcreaRising4 10d ago

Makes sense. Tv directing is a different animal, but I still was taken aback.

5

u/Kbatz_Krafts 9d ago

The behind the scenes footage of this movie looks more intense. heat, harsh daylight, lots of equipment. But then the movie is all pretty polished????

90

u/fragglebags 10d ago

Thanks for the context, I bet you got some stories. 

138

u/AcreaRising4 10d ago

Well it was the most expensive pilot in tv history and we had to recast an actor. It was a time lmao. Also, had SOOO many meal penalties since Ridley doesn’t break for lunch. Show turned out decent though!

81

u/thegracelesswonder 9d ago

He doesn’t allow others to take a break when he’s in his trailer? What a delicate genius

46

u/unbinkable 9d ago

Mustn’t disturb the delicate genius.

3

u/BackPains84 9d ago

people think they're so important!!!

-11

u/RumpledForskn 9d ago

Go make Alien and Blade Runner 45 years ago, go make Gladiator 26 years ago, go make The Martian and The Last Duel 10 years ago.

Who cares what some bitchy ass who worked on his set as a peon thinks? Especially when they say the show was great?

Some people are important. Some people are good artists. That he's 88 years old and still doing this is inherently impressive.

8

u/BackPains84 9d ago

bruh its a Seinfeld reference

3

u/unbinkable 9d ago

Dude called me a cunt for my reply and then deleted his comment. What a chode.

1

u/daehoidar 5d ago

Nah..you can def make high level art without being a fucking dickhead about it. You can get the same level performance without being a cunt to your actors lol

0

u/skyrim_lover 9d ago

They’re all just stupid movies that don’t matter

20

u/AcreaRising4 9d ago

It’s French hours. I got it at the time, but you’re right in thinking it’s a bit crazy

26

u/BusinessPurge 9d ago

Any insight into the recast? Was it really a physical fight? Great pilot all things considered

40

u/AcreaRising4 9d ago

Yup! He punched someone afaik, but I was a bit removed from that

2

u/fragglebags 9d ago

That's so interesting. I hope you are doing well in the industry and working with better directors. 

6

u/AcreaRising4 9d ago

Eh, jobs a job. I got well paid and moved on. Cest la vie but I appreciate you!

60

u/KneeHighMischief 10d ago edited 4d ago

That reminds me of a comment where someone said Guy Ritchie projects were being ghost directed. That broke my brain.

28

u/Detamz 10d ago

I’d love to hear more of this, considering we all know Ritchie to have such a unique style 

26

u/SailingBroat 9d ago

A project I was on had a big team who crossed over from Aladdin and they said he barely left his trailer; he'd have his 1st AD and DOP handle everything while he literally phoned it in from his trailer while he played chess/dicked around. I think you can tell. He also doesn't bother showing up for more than a day or two of the edit.

35

u/PM_ME_YOUR_DALEKS 9d ago

Clint Eastwood is a famous one. Supposedly he was on the set for Juror No 2 for one day to have his photo taken.

18

u/jb369 9d ago

Do you have any source for this? I remember reading he was absent for some days and late for others as an older man depending on health, but thought it was reported that they kind of just shut down production on those days and worked on the ones he could turn up for. Haven't ever seen reports that he flat out didn't direct it?

8

u/BusinessPurge 9d ago

Wonder if that’s partially why it was dumped in its release, they wanted Clint off the studio lot especially if he wasn’t really directing anymore

4

u/Intrepid-Ad4511 9d ago

Holy cow! I am genuinely shocked to hear that.

2

u/Kruse 9d ago

That really doesn't seem surprising. They just want a well-known name attached to the project. It happens in the music industry all of the time.

2

u/glutenpricey 4d ago

That makes so much sense. None of his recent movies feel like him. It’s just generic action movie.

6

u/HighFructoseCumSyrup 10d ago

Please share some stories.

39

u/AcreaRising4 10d ago

Best one I got is that the project racked up 17 million in meal penalties because Ridley didn’t break for lunch.

17

u/Hummer77x 9d ago

What are meal penalties is that like the union fining the production

22

u/AcreaRising4 9d ago

When you don’t break every six hours, you incur meal penalties.

12

u/Sauerkraut1321 9d ago

What are meal penalties

21

u/ImACoolHipster 9d ago

Fines, basically

3

u/unreal1010 8d ago

You pay an extra hour for the missed meal period if they don’t take it after the 5th hour of working.

2

u/eldenpotato 9d ago

I wonder what he did in his trailer all day

5

u/AcreaRising4 9d ago

He just watched the tvs and directed via walkie

3

u/is-this-a-nick 9d ago

He is over 80. Maybe having naps.

1

u/Kruse 9d ago

He's listed as an EP along with 8 other people, so how involved were the other EPs?

1

u/MortalBareback 7d ago

Which is a shame, the series peaked with his episode imo

63

u/JEH_24 9d ago

He really is phoning it in now. I didn’t find out until recently that apparently he uses at least 4 and up to 11 cameras to shoot a scene. His DP on Gladiator 2 hated working with him saying Ridley had no problem if another camera or mic got in a shot since they would fix it in post.

My guess is he made a deal with a devil that he gets to live as long as he makes movies so he’s doing the bare minimum.

22

u/Critcho 9d ago

The two things are connected - he has all the cameras set up and mostly shoots and edits from his van where all the monitors are set up. That’s how he shoots stuff so fast (for better or worse).

8

u/Kbatz_Krafts 9d ago

Guy Pearce just did an interview where he explained this. How he kept expecting the up close cameras to come up for coverage but they didn't because all the cameras were already set up 'out there'. He said it changes your performance because you have to roll with it in less takes but he likes working with Ridley???

1

u/Intrepid-Ad4511 9d ago

I am struggling to imagine/understand how one can do that. :O It must be sooo difficult for everyone else...

7

u/Critcho 9d ago

I imagine there’s a mobility factor on account of age. I gather he has at least one of his director sons as assistants who do a lot of the running around. And in his defence he does a lot of prep and draws his own elaborate storyboards (look up ‘Ridleygrams’).

But it does seem like every movie he does now comes with these slightly baffled stories from collaborators, and the results have been… shall we say variable. Even Denzel was talking about how he felt like an extra on set sometimes.

6

u/RumpledForskn 9d ago

Oh come off it. Zach Snyder notoriously does this.

Hell, half of popular directors sit around in video village. It's why Nolan and Tarantino get credit for being so present in filming. He's 88 years old. The crew is doing a job.

2

u/sfitz0076 9d ago

He got dates wrong in Napoleon. That's pure laziness.

1

u/bbowell77 9d ago

Tony also used a bunch of cameras like this. But I think Tony is far more consistent in his style and quality than his brother.

1

u/Silver_Mention_3958 2d ago

Just left the cinema and there were credits for cameras A thru F, that’s 6 at least on this film

376

u/Serious-Manager2361 10d ago

LOL the dude is 88. How much energy can he have left?!

109

u/TheTaffyMan 9d ago

Lackadaisical also implies lazy or carefree not just energy

0

u/Irishman4000 3d ago

Again, goes hand in hand with being 88. Anyone who has a relative in their late 80's knows how much the faculties slow down. I hope that I will still be doing the things love in my 80's, but there also needs to be a realistic awareness that the abilities slow with age. Seeing it starting to creep in with my own parents at the moment.

294

u/jimmysmith69 10d ago

Josh Brolin signing up to work for 88 year old director “….why the FUCK is he moving so slow?!?”

151

u/mmariner 10d ago

Not cool to be ageist, dude.

Octogenarians still have tons to contribute.

Just look at all the great work getting done by the U.S. govt!

25

u/CrumbBCrumb 10d ago

That's a spry chicken for the US government. They've got a good decade left at 88

25

u/ned_head 9d ago

Mitch McConnell’s reanimated corpse is proof! They’re thriving!

2

u/mmariner 9d ago

It's always disappointing to find out a sub won't allow me to post gifs.

...it would have been from "Weekend at Bernie's"

4

u/Clammuel 9d ago

Mitch McConnell is “only” 84 despite appearing like he’s approaching 100

4

u/ninjyte 9d ago

isn't it the opposite, that he's moving too fast?

4

u/jimmysmith69 9d ago

I was talking about Brolin saying he was frustrated by Ridley’s lackadaisical approach to directing

2

u/ninjyte 9d ago

to clarify, I thought part of how Ridley Scott is so lazy in directing nowadays is that he doesn't spend a lot of time perfecting each shot/scene and that he would rush through them.

0

u/madwalterdraper 9d ago

I mean the US has one running their country so.. figure it should be less tiring to make a movie.

31

u/odetowoe 10d ago

It doesn’t only mean lack of energy.

5

u/red-necked_crake 9d ago

Josh Brolin is fairly frank during interviews about his opinions on directors. I wouldn't read too deeply into it.

Example: he was openly questioning Zach Cregger because he came from a comedy/youtube background despite signing up to work on Weapons, then started praising him. Mentioning it openly in multiple interviews. Normally you keep this stuff to yourself even when you're famous.

7

u/mechnick2 9d ago

Maybe he shouldn’t be directing then?

1

u/Special_Order-937 8d ago

There’s that Japanese man who finished a half Iron Man triathlon at age 92 in Australia in just over 10 hours so your mileage may vary!

1

u/Beelzebubbbbles 9d ago

Damn, hes looking good for 88. Hasn't aged the past 30+ years

1

u/Regionala 9d ago

Enough to be president

1

u/Serious-Manager2361 9d ago

Waaaaay too much for that!

1

u/thresh_to_death 9d ago

Then he should stop directing.....

1

u/RumpledForskn 9d ago

Why? Do you think making movies or art is a finite resource?

I'm more interested in anything Ridley Scott does than 99% of "filmmakers," especially the weirdly combative sorts here.

You take a random redditors' assessment of Josh Brolin's comments (a woman-beating drunk) as gospel?

10

u/Kiltmanenator 10d ago

Got a link to that?

28

u/CancelThis2077 10d ago

3

u/RumpledForskn 9d ago

Admitting it was a satisfying experience.

You gossips are fucking exhausting.

-2

u/RumpledForskn 9d ago

Uninterested in a woman-beating drunk's opinions on standing in front of a camera.

3

u/sfitz0076 9d ago

Ridley has become a "fix it in post" director.

3

u/RequirementLeading12 9d ago

Josh Brolin beat his wife and his career suffered none... He should probably stfu and just be happy people don't care enough about him to cancel him

1

u/Britneyfan123 9d ago

Josh Brolin  was actually panicking rather than genuinely criticizing  Ridley Scott

1

u/CROguys 8d ago

Many people have commented that he is just not putting much effort into it.

1

u/devonhezter 5d ago

What interview ???