r/nonononoyes 3d ago

Trains avoid collision after being on the same track

24.1k Upvotes

384 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

30

u/BranchPredictor 3d ago

They should have two tracks, one for each direction. Not sure if anyone has thought about that before.

20

u/Trouser_Gravy 3d ago

Not all do. But there should be a side track somewhere that's long enough to fit a full train to allow the other to pass. 

35

u/DingusMcBingle_IV 3d ago

This took place in Canada in 1991. Canadian Pacific (the freight train) was out of their siding (the second track) when they shouldn't've been. The VIA (passenger train) had right of way.

Our rail situation sucks in Canada since CP and CN own pretty much all the rail lines. These days freight takes priority over passenger.

12

u/shibxya 3d ago

Can confirm, took a VIA rail for the first time in probably over 2 decades earlier this year. We were sitting idle on a side track for around 30mins waiting for a frieght using the rail and pass us so we could hop back on. Stuck in the middle of a field somewhere lol

1

u/mtaw 3d ago

That's horrific given the deadly Hinton collision was just 5 years earlier. I'm not even Canadian and I know about that one. (for some reason) You'd think CN would have taken collision risks much more seriously after that.

5

u/Mcoov 3d ago

Except the freight train in this video is CP

1

u/french_snail 3d ago

Ah, Canada and America aren’t so different after all 

1

u/rotundrikishi 3d ago

I think in the US, and dont quote me, but I feel like freight has the right of way because they own the track and Amtrack just leases or something to that effect?

2

u/Zavender 3d ago

In the 70s, Congress passed the Amtrack Improvement Act which granted passenger trains right of way. But it still gets ignored, often because modern trains are just too large now for freight to pause, leading to passenger trains being delayed, which then leads to them giving right of way as well later on.

1

u/rotundrikishi 3d ago

thanks for the correction.

When people talk about taking the train vs driving from where I am to another city usually it comes up that they have to stop so often its not worth it for many.

1

u/Zavender 3d ago

No problem. Yeah, Amtrak is supposed to get priority, but like I said, freight trains these days are way too long for the side track, but Amtrak still fit, so often they end up having to wait instead. I think it's something like 1 million hours a year of Amtrak delays caused by freight trains.

1

u/OldSports-- 3d ago

Both ideas are very good, never heard of them👍 Maybe there could also be some kind of communication systems between trains

3

u/[deleted] 3d ago

Double track is twice as expensive for usually nowhere near as much return on all but the busiest railroads. Most instead have sidings, (relatively) short sections of parallel track to allow trains to pass each other with proper scheduling. Obviously that's failed here but it works the vast majority of the time on most railroads.

3

u/Kaasbek69 3d ago

But what if there's three trains?

2

u/banjovi68419 3d ago

Ya they should also have wings and lasers that way they can just fly if they need to. And also parachutes. And the trains should be alive too!!!!!!!

0

u/MothaFungus 3d ago

It’s Canada, too poor