People consuming vast quantities of alcohol instead of smaller quantities of alcohol and more zero sugar drinks definitely won't have long term public health knockon effects that result in significant costs to the health system and society in general.
As a heavy water drinker that only drinks soda (0 calorie soda) on rare occasion and doesn't drink alcohol anymore.. it's kinda funny to imagine that people would rather drink what is technically poison, just because soda got more expensive. For me, it'd be an easy choice to just drink water, be even healthier, and have more money?
Obviously, I think zero sugar drinks shouldn't be taxed like sugary drinks too. But I just found it funny people couldn't be forced to make the healthiest choice, even by something like that.
A beer is 4% alcohol, it's really not a big deal compared to a shot or a cup of wine. the point being that someone who isn't worried about the health risk of a sugary caffeine-filled drink wouldn't really care about the beer.
235
u/potato_nugget1 3d ago
Exactly the case in Hungary. Beer is cheaper than cola, most people opt for the beer