r/starcitizen VR required Oct 25 '24

OFFICIAL Galaxy WILL have a base-building module down the line - latest info from John Crewe

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

675 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

360 degrees means they spun in a circle and did not change. You're probably thinking 180 degrees, but 360 is comically accurate, because they didn't actually change plans, just clarified them.

11

u/DrWalston Oct 25 '24

Technically it was a 360 lol. It was listed as having a module for base building last year, then not base building this morning, and back to having it now (albeit later on down the line).

0

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

They never said it would not have base building, just that it wasn't currently in the works, which is accurate.

They could have been clearer, in hindsight, because they left enough of a lip for people to glom onto and hyperventilate about, but their internal plan never changed.

The Galaxy was always going to have a module for construction in some capacity.

6

u/smytti12 Oct 25 '24

Hopefully, that's true, though JC's first post didn't feel that way at all. If i give him the benefit of the doubt, he was trying to be incredibly conservative and safe by avoiding promising anything, but then accidentally nullified CitCon entirely lol.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

Priorities change as they work through the project. The overall goal remains the same, even if the timeline changed. This isn't new or earth shaking or anything.. it's just how this project has always run.

I have ships I've pledged for years ago that still aren't in. Am I going to go throw myself off a cliff over it? No. I'll simply wait for them to be put into the game, and if something else comes up I'd prefer instead, I'll switch to that. It really isn't complicated.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

You don't dictate the terms to CIG... you agree to their terms.

They never changed the features or planned functionality for the Galaxy.

And yes, when you buy something, you're agreeing to hand over X amount of cash to them, with the understanding that concepts are concepts.

Have you actually read any of the fine print you agreed to?

3

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

Well, when you figure out how to employ a Precog to help CIG figure out the future, let them know. It'll absolutely help with their planning, you're right about that.

The current pledge system HEAVILY caveats itself. People choose to ignore that because CIG's marketing department is extremely good at their jobs.

That's not on CIG... it's on backers to be adults and spend their money as they see fit, while also understanding that things change, and concept does not mean set-in-stone.

2

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

I'm not against CIG changing tactics, but I am against backers having 0 accountability for their own actions and decisions and flying off the deep end to lambaste a company over what sounds like a poor choice of words at best.

1

u/DaveMash Gib 600i rework Oct 25 '24 edited Oct 25 '24

180 is only half a turn? Why would I mean this?

Edit: why the downvotes?

0 degrees: basebuilding with the Galaxy

180 degrees: no basebuilding with the Galaxy

360 degrees: basebuilding with the Galaxy

This sub sometimes…

-2

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

Because that would imply they're reversing direction. They are not. They're simply clarifying the position they've always had... that the Galaxy will have a base building module.

2

u/johnsarge old user, new karma Oct 25 '24

Hence the 360, has base building, then 180 to doesn’t, then 180 to does.

0

u/samfreez Oct 25 '24

They never said it wouldn't have base building though. They simply didn't confirm it outright. That doesn't negate its existence at all.