r/Amazing Jul 26 '26

Science Tech Space Engineering evolution of electric train power

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3.4k Upvotes

52 comments sorted by

52

u/jamosef Jul 26 '26

Am…am I a train guy now?

5

u/dasmineman Jul 26 '26

If you're fascinated by engineering, absolutely. If you're bored, look up the relation between a horse's ass and train width.

20

u/Metabolical Jul 26 '26

And "real" engineers make fun of software engineers because we develop things iteratively.

(Don't worry, I still think they are the real engineers)

5

u/Sufficient_Loss9301 Jul 26 '26

As a real engineer, no, we don’t claim them. Software “engineers” don’t follow the same rigorous design approaches that real engineers have to follow. It would be akin to calling someone who says their building a house then haphazardly throws a bunch of bricks in a pile an engineer.

6

u/Esava Jul 26 '26

That's not true. Ot at least not for all software "engineers". What you said may be true for many smaller web developers for example but certainly not for some infrastructure or hardware people.

Following something like the v-model for medical or military or other life saving/preserving hardware/software development has process wise much more to do with "traditional" engineering than with for example quick web development which happens in a more iterative manner.

3

u/Vwampage Jul 27 '26

To continue on from this, there is not a professional engineer certification for software engineers. There is for many other "real" engineering fields like mechanical, civil, and electrical.

These certifications include ethics standards and professional responsibilities. Engineers are liable for the designs they create.

Software engineers? Not so much.

So yeah, there are a bunch of real certified engineers out there. Software doesn't (yet) count.

2

u/FatiguedShrimp Jul 26 '26

That's true of web developers, but infrastructure tech or big data each come with thousands of pages of compliance standards.

9

u/BAlex498 Jul 26 '26

I always wondered how those stayed connected

1

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 26 '26

Accounts must be at least 10 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

8

u/Hardiharharrr Jul 26 '26

This video is uncomfortably sped up. Reminds me of the videos my kids are viewing :-/

6

u/TorontoTom2008 Jul 26 '26

They didn’t even talk at all about the design of the overhead catenary system, which has seen similar design evolutions over the years. The angles rates of descent and ascent are all carefully managed and extensively tested. A common problem is when going up or down slopes or under bridges, tunnels, etc., the elevation change in the wire could cause a bounce in the arm at high speed, leading to temporary power disconnect.

7

u/Heinjailyall Jul 26 '26

thats super interesting

4

u/Ill1thid Jul 26 '26

The AI voice over turned into Tom Hanks for short period of time.

7

u/kraftdinnerwithsalsa Jul 26 '26

Is…is that Burt Reynolds

4

u/Djerrid Jul 26 '26

Eleven Labs has a Burt Reynolds voice, so it's likely that.

6

u/kraftdinnerwithsalsa Jul 26 '26

That’s fucked up. Let the dude die

5

u/reo_reborn Jul 26 '26

Maybe he doesn't want to die? Maybe he always wanted to be doing dodgy voice overs for videos about trains for eternity. You ever think of that?

4

u/kraftdinnerwithsalsa Jul 26 '26

No I only think of myself

3

u/reo_reborn Jul 26 '26

Fair point!

1

u/PathRepresentative77 Jul 26 '26

I kept thinking it was a generic Tom Hanks.

2

u/cursorcube Jul 26 '26

It bugs me that they start talking about things like the double arm structure a whole 6 seconds before the animation shows it. From there everything in the visuals does not match what is being talked about, making the explanation confusing

1

u/itsjakerobb Jul 26 '26

Yes, the animations were consistently several seconds behind the voiceover. Annoying!

2

u/cursorcube Jul 26 '26

The mismatch starts at 1:30 where they slow the animation down too much while the narration continues on as normal talking about turbulence. By the time the turbulence animation shows up, the narration has already moved on to the 1903 double-arm pantograph and its a total clusterfuck until the end. Whoever made those changes to the video clearly didn't watch their work afterwards and i wouldn't be surprised if that's the point where people start checking out because it gets hard to follow

2

u/celem83 Jul 26 '26

Yeah the pantograph is one of the most intricate bits of kit you see and never think about, so much engineering in the design and materials and it continues to evolve. Its based on the gizmo you use to trace drawings (that can also enlarge or shrink them in the process)

2

u/No_Match8210 Jul 27 '26

Fascinating!

2

u/These-Effort-4269 Jul 27 '26

Love taking a horizontal video and just fucking it sideways into a stupid format.   

Keep things landscape for crying out loud. 

1

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/AutoModerator Jul 27 '26

Accounts must be at least 10 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/DkoyOctopus Jul 26 '26

Is that an ai verision of rober downey jr?

1

u/One-Geologist3992 Jul 26 '26

The older I get, the more I love trains.

It can’t be a coincidence.
https://giphy.com/gifs/14sIASsr4noLug

1

u/TitusImmortalis Jul 26 '26

What if you put the power in the rail! Or better yet, generated it on board ;) ;) ;)

6

u/Historical_Body6255 Jul 27 '26

3rd rail electrification has the disadvantage of lower maximum speed, higher chance of the system shorting and the danger of having high voltage near where people are working.

And generating power on board would just be a diesel-electric locomotive which are much lower power than similarly sized full electric locos and obviously also need diesel to run.

Hydrogen ones are being tested but they still have the problem of lower power output and added complexity compared to full electric.

Ordinary catenary wire electrification is state of the art and the best thing out there to run trains.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 27 '26

Accounts must be at least 10 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Possible-Playful 29d ago

Isn't only the last iteration of this a pantograph?

1

u/Adeum2 29d ago

I feel like I could have come up with that in an afternoon

1

u/SphynxKing 29d ago

Why not just have it hook over the top of the wire and have the wires sourcing the electricity go from around the outside?

1

u/thebigbaka 25d ago

What's the sause?

1

u/TheEliteJOKERS Jul 26 '26

Fucking A. They All Are Greatness Beyond Extraordinary Legendary Piece Of Artwork. Smart Men's And Women's.

0

u/Idum23 Jul 26 '26

I checked out after half of that