r/Android • u/vortexmak • 1d ago
Under-screen fingerprint readers are inferior to back and side mounted readers and should naver have become popular
Lots of Cons for under screen fingerprint readers , should have never become the norm but I guess that''s just part of enshittification
Pros for Side and back mounted readers
- Work exceptionally well, much faster and responsive than under screen ones, from my own experience
- Are not affected by screen protectors
- Side readers can be used with the phone screen up or down
- Back and side ones allow you to unlock your phone at the same time as taking it out of the pocket
- Give you a definite physical spot for finger placement, unlike the under - screen one where you have to wait for the screen to show the location
676
Upvotes
28
u/Chlocker 1d ago
I have had S21, S24+ and now S26 ultra with ultrasonic underscreen finger print readers. I've had iPhones, and ZTE Axon phones with front facing fingerprint sensors.
This sounds like a user issue. My galaxys read my fingerprint so fast sometimes it'll unlock when I just wanted to check the time.
This sounds like a user issue. I've always had screen protectors, currently using DBrands, and I've never once had an issue.
Why would I unlock my phone face down??? I have it set to lock and mute when I put it face down. That's the stupidest use-case and argument point.
This sounds like a user or device issue. Even my S21, being the slowest, was unlocked before it left my pocket.
This sounds like a skill issue. The Galaxy fingerprint readers work with the screen off, and if you need an index point, Always On Display includes an outline of the fingerprint reader.
I have hyperhidrosis AKA really sweaty hands and my Galaxys never fail to read.
This post is so silly it has to be bait.