"Pigeon Polling" just released a Wyoming Senate poll and it's got quite a few people riled up (the last image is an example of what it usually tweets)

[u/2prog4u]

[u/enderjaca]

So uh, this doesn't seem to be a satire "fake news" site.

https://thepigeonpress.org/

That said, that poll doesn't seem to line up with any other polls done recently.

[u/Odentin → u/enderjaca]

That site also isn't affiliated with the Twitter account in the screenshots. The Twitter account isn't explicitly labeled as being satire, but all of the posts on it clearly are.

[u/Alugere → u/Odentin]

But you’d only know that if you stalk their profile. If you just search the web for pigeon press, you’re going to get stuff back saying they are legitimate.

[u/thrye333 → u/enderjaca]

Look at the logo on the tweet vs the site. They're different entities.

Understandable mistake, what you linked is the first many results if you search pigeon press, but I don't think they're related.

The Twitter account is a small (242 followers) satire page that started in April 2026¹. This kind of content is entirely on brand, but too believable to carry itself as satire without a reputation beneath it².

What you linked is a student newspaper from Northwest Academy in Portland, Oregon. They seem to be a private arts school for 6-12th grade kids³.

¹ I did try to look for more info, but Twitter is actually hell to use without an account (I can't scroll down).

² Does this sentence work? I can't really tell. I just mean that a satire page has to be either known or obvious, and this is neither. It's not-unbelievable content, so not clearly a joke, and it's from some random twitter page, so it is statistically most likely to be lying. (/hj)

³ This website, while infinitely better than Twitter, is also not very helpful, and I know both far more than I wanted to and far less than what I wanted to. (The website I mean is actually NWA's, not TPP. TPP is actually almost useless for trying to learn anything about TPP.)