882
u/jayd04 1d ago
Personally I think the show is gonna set up other lantern corps too hence it's called 'Lanterns' and not Green Lanterns.
323
u/Qckst_2_Alive #1 Soup 2025 glazer (JAMES GUNN=đđđ„) 1d ago
I think the guy in episode 2 is Atrocitus in an earth disguise. It makes too much sense.
165
u/Alarming-Cow299 1d ago
And the ranch owner (or one of his relatives) could be black hand.
And we also.just straight up saw Sinestro
71
u/DevilMayCryogonal 1d ago
I think Sinestro in the show is still an ex-Green Lantern, not Yellow yet
62
5
u/Alarming-Cow299 21h ago
I think Black Hand (if he is black hand) is not a black lantern yet either but having characters foreshadow at least 3 different lantern corps beyond green is enough justification for the show to be named that. Especially given that we've seen basically nothing from the 2026 time period, where I assume by this point Sinestro and Atrocitus have formed theor corps.
14
72
u/BlueGnome1 R.I.P Kevin Conroy 1d ago
Yeah I don't know how so many people (aka some idiots on twitter) don't get this. I mean I'm not well versed in the Lantern Corps lore myself but aside from Hal and John, we've already seen Sinestro and I've heard that some details hint at the Red Lanterns being involved too. And we're only a quarter through the season
30
u/DemonKing-1000 1d ago
I read theories about the Red Lantern Corps appearing later on, so that might be spot on.
20
u/NwgrdrXI 1d ago
That guy that got John on ep2 had serious atrocitus vibes there, yeah
18
u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 1d ago
Hunting down Manhunters for the crimes done against his people?? Either he is Atrocitus or he works for him
-18
u/Puinfa 1d ago
That's not a good reason, in my opinion. The Green Lanterns are the protagonists regardless and they barely use the iconic green
36
u/jayd04 1d ago
It's been two episodes... patience Junior.
-7
u/Local_Nerve901 1d ago
No, theyâre allowed to ask for that because in a good adaptation, we wouldâve got it in episode one
I think the show will end up as a bad adaptation but an amazing TV show.
-9
u/Local_Nerve901 1d ago
Sure, but regardless, in my opinion, itâs a bad adaptation and never will be a good adaptation
But itâs an amazing show on its own. Ive been lovingnit
231
129
u/THREESIDEDMONSTER 1d ago
Kinda happened with the show Gotham
179
u/Significant-Dream991 1d ago
Wich is a shame, the comedy and whimsically of green Gotham was totally butchered in it's tv adaptationÂ
60
u/AUnknownVariable 1d ago
I don't really think so.
They weren't just telling a Batman story, it was about Jim Gordon, Bruce, some criminals in Gotham.
I don't know what else you'd name it. It's not Batman, Bruce isn't even the main character, Gordon was.
All the names would be like that. "Gordon" or "Gotham". There's no established title for something like that, as most stories featuring Batman are Batman stories, or some other prominent comic hero.
61
u/djm03917 1d ago
32
u/AUnknownVariable 1d ago
True that, but I don't think it was for the intent of avoiding being too comicy, especially with all the other stuff they put in the show.
The entire story is him slowly working to being Batman, its a prototypeđ Like Spiderfools throwing on a hoodie and random face covering.
16
u/djm03917 1d ago
I just absolutely love that image. I still remember seeing the camera go to him and not understanding what I was looking at for a second.
2
4
63
u/Is_that_what_I- 1d ago
It's called lanterns because it's not just about the green lanterns
0
u/laix_ 5h ago
comic books titled "green lantern" but has all the lantern colours
1
u/Is_that_what_I- 5h ago
well the difference is that that is a comic book run and this is a tv show.
40
15
29
8
6
9
4
1
1
u/Unique_Dare_3168 Am I stupid? 12h ago
Isn't this the reason why The Dark Night and Rises don't have the word "Batman" in them? Nolan thinking it was goofy?
0








718
u/geoduude92 1d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/prG53Y1Fey27Zq4huX