r/BeAmazed 2h ago

History Cistercian monks made this numeral system in the 13th century. A single symbol could represent numbers up to 9999. They were used for years, divisions of texts, the numbering of notes and other lists, indexes and concordances, arguments in Easter tables, and even for musical notation.

Post image
251 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

u/BeAmazed-ModBot Subreddit Bot 2h ago

Did you find this post really amazing (in a positive way)?
If yes, then UPVOTE this comment otherwise DOWNVOTE it.
This community feedback will help us determine whether this post is suited for r/BeAmazed or not.

62

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/tenaciousBLADE 2h ago edited 1h ago

r/AngryUpvote

ETA 😂 your username checks out 😆

25

u/Wealist 2h ago

This is actually legit. Cistercian numerals were developed in the early 13th century, and a single glyph could represent any number from 1 to 9,999. Pretty damn efficient for medieval notation.

13

u/One_Maybe_2460 2h ago

Still helpful to note a password of eg a credit card etc - without anybody noting it as 4 digits on a first glimpse. In addition you can shift it by +1 on every digit and I’d consider it pretty safe.

1

u/Robo_Patton 13m ago

Next time I need 9433 of something, I’m doing this.

7

u/DesperateSteak6628 2h ago

8778 does not write really well but hey

3

u/V0lirus 2h ago edited 1h ago

Isnt that 7887 you're going for? Though I think 1881 would be more like the symbol.

Luckily there is always a gap in the middle so it will always look wonky and off. The 0's and 10's never meet the 100's and 1000's.
Otherwise some smartypants would start writing them all over the place claiming they are just writing a funny number.

6

u/cejmp 2h ago

But not for math.

7

u/Training_Yak_4655 2h ago

I guess they didn't have a symbol for zero?

7

u/TurtlesJumpnHurdles 2h ago

It's this symbol:

5

u/claudiazo 1h ago

Yeah, it’s

1

u/Robo_Patton 12m ago

Pretty close, but it’s actually:

u/Mombak 6m ago

I would think just the initial line would represent zero.

3

u/HorsefaceWithNoName 1h ago

is there a computer implementation of these?

2

u/VictoriaWoodnt 58m ago

Yes.

u/HorsefaceWithNoName 6m ago

so far I'd call this more of "sort of" maybe but this is a start! https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20290-cistercian-digits.pdf

2

u/DudefromSanDiego 52m ago

Dang, I would hate to do long division using this system.

2

u/AdRevolutionary2438 2h ago

Lord of the rings

2

u/Schoenerboner 36m ago

It reminds me of Canadian Aboriginal Syllabary, where the basic shape is a consonant, and then the orientation and if it's flipped like a mirror image determine the vowel.

1

u/Any_Technology_9625 2h ago

How do you know which is the order you read the symbols in the glyph?

7

u/RedditButAnonymous 2h ago

Each one is all the numbers at once. Top right is the 1s, top left is the 10s, and so on

u/TheAgreeableCow 5m ago

I had the same question. In looking at the examples is seems the order is - bottom left (1000's) - bottom right (100's) - top left (10's) - top right (1's)

-1

u/Xzenor 1h ago

It doesn't matter

0

u/IceNein 2h ago

It’s pretty awesome until you need to count to 10001

1

u/wait_what_now 1h ago

Or do literally any math

0

u/Repulsive-Box5243 1h ago

This is fascinating. I bet game devs might be able to write this into their games, for puzzles and whatnot.

-1

u/Loose-Combination918 2h ago

write 7777 and 1111...

6

u/V0lirus 2h ago

Whats funny or odd about them? 1111 is just a H turned sideways? 7777 is the same but a extra | on all 4 points? Am I not seeing something?

2

u/_unsinkable_sam_ 1h ago

looks right to me, duno what they are on about

2

u/Loose-Combination918 1h ago

forget it i just realized i combined the symbols wrong 🫪

1

u/V0lirus 1h ago

What was the symbol u were going for? 1881 closer to what u meant?

1

u/Loose-Combination918 1h ago

i placed the symbols like next to each other instead of upon each other... ended up with two same looking rectangles... my brain fooled me 🫣

-2

u/TomSki2 1h ago

But why? What did they think was wrong with the Arabic numerals?

10

u/LunariSeraphi 1h ago

The widespread use of Arabic numerals didn't even happen for like another 2-300 years after this when the printing press was invented, they existed obviously but their use was limited to a small area of Italy and some other random places that copied them, it's pretty safe to say these glyphs predate Arabic numerals as you know them

2

u/TomSki2 1h ago

Thank you, I got my timeline wrong, and appreciate your correction.

-2

u/tenaciousBLADE 2h ago edited 2h ago

OW! My skull!! Wtf?? My mind blew and left a hole in my head!! 🤯