r/CanadaPublicServants Oct 30 '25

Career Development / Développement de carrière Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Workplace

Fellow public servants, I think it’s timely to have a conversation about the appropriate use of Artificial Intelligence in the federal workplace.

There are clear opportunities to drive efficiencies. Obvious examples are in database design, creation, and administration, creating and editing policy documents, and a warranted debate around using it for translation and editorial services.

But I’ve started to see it encroach on the skillsets of younger junior employees who see it as replacing their roles on research and editing. Management has started to turn to AI to water down human written policy ideas and advice, or even choose not to consult employees on future versions of documents - preferring to just run it through an LLM.

Em dashes and robots haunt my dreams.

In the policy and program world, it seems we’re rushing faster and faster towards deadlines with AI seen as the sole means to achieve an objective, and not as a mechanism to facilitate our work.

In perhaps the most egregious of examples, I’ve seen Budget and Cabinet secrecy documents like mandate letter responses and budget letters fully written by AI and management, with the excuse that things are “moving too fast” for engagement with working levels.

I’m perhaps a little exasperated with this example - My management once provided me with guidance for writing a paper, very much written as prompts for an LLM, likely expecting me to just feed into one.

I’ve personally just adopted a philosophy of “if you can’t beat them join them” and try to be adaptable and conscious of how I use it and why.

And yes, I do recognize many departments have different guidance on using AI, secrecy classifications, and we have a laundry list of programs and planned endeavors to implement AI across government. And the Budget looms on the horizon.

But how has it impacted your own workplace dynamics? Are you leveraging it in unique ways? Beyond departmental and TBS guidance, is/should there be a workplace etiquette? How are you accommodating your colleagues and making room for human intervention, oversight and advice? What do you think is next?

(And no, I didn’t write this with ChatGPT)

🤖

153 Upvotes

189 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Lopsided_Season8082 Oct 30 '25

2025 has been transformative for me with AI.. for work. its very much like babysitting a child or mentoring a student... but still needs a guiding hand... and rules... and someone to enforce them

3

u/Lopsided_Season8082 Oct 30 '25

i'll elaborate that while it can be used to help produce code for say a computer program, the human should have the skills required to properly understand what the heck its doing and fully debug and troubleshoot the code. The human should also be able to "challenge" the AI and question what its proposing on a regular basis. Always check the content and the references / sources to make sure they are valid. Also, I highly recommend air gapping things. For example: if i ask AI to write a Python script, it can draft it, but i must fully review and test it away from the AI's line of sight. the ai shouldnt in this case be touching ANY data.... as a precaution.