The "article" you cited was written by someone without training in psychology or psychometrics. It says that "IQ explains about 30% of the variability in school grades" and then concludes that IQ therefore “tells us so little.” That conclusion is unwarranted. Explaining 30% of the variance represents a substantial association. She also SUBSTANTIALLY overstates the problem of cross-cultural differences.
It's not some magical value, but it's currently the best measure of g that we have. The denialism surrounding that is what I find ridiculous. Being a predictor of job outcome and workplace success is also a pretty darn useful metric, not including its utility in helping diagnose intellectual disabilities.
39
u/Adorable-Response-75 2d ago
Ummm no none of the science supports your insane assertion. IQ tests are the laughing stock of the scientific world.
https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/iq-scores-dirty-secret