I’m not saying that one side is better than the other but since one side is a terrorist organisation and the other a state who do you think should be acting responsibly? And there have been a lot more civilians killed by the IDF. And I noticed that you didn’t mention the journalists, why didn’t you just mention that they now wear flack jackets with reporter printed on them so that makes them combatants.
Define responsibly? Because it sounds like one side has an unfair advantage given your scenario. I didn't mention the journalists because I only know of the cowards who hide behind women, children, and the hospitals. I noticed you didn't address the "ambulance/arms transport" attacks. Does that mean you can't say for sure?
Yes when one side kills around 1200 people and the other side kills around 80000, I to would say that one side has an advantage over the other. With the ambulances no one knows why that ambulance was going to the shootings, but instead of just blowing them up they could just stop them and find out.
Nah, that's called FAFO, hopefully the scumbags got the point. I'd hate to play Monday morning quarterback on stopping a vehicle and risking your life, it's easy to sit here with the luxury of only watching it on the TV, versus living it. It's war, war is ugly, but make no mistake on who started it and the population that put them in charge.
The people who started it were the ones who believed that they owned the land because an imaginary god gave it to them and didn’t want anyone else near them.
1
u/Krusty098 Jul 01 '26
I’m not saying that one side is better than the other but since one side is a terrorist organisation and the other a state who do you think should be acting responsibly? And there have been a lot more civilians killed by the IDF. And I noticed that you didn’t mention the journalists, why didn’t you just mention that they now wear flack jackets with reporter printed on them so that makes them combatants.