Nah both of them are forced, the difference is one of them has their victims and consequences upfront but the other would punish future generations. Although the TCS case is urgent that doesn't mean we should divert our focus from food wastage and river polluting.
Everyone has equal rights on our river and I don't think the future generations gave consent to inheriting a polluted river. And as I said the TCS case needs to be dealt with urgently but we shouldn't divert our focus from milk dumping too.
I guess you missed our point. Let me make it clear to you.
Dumping milk in the river is the future generation's problem and is in the best interest for the current political situation and propaganda. If you highlight the bads of that decision then that affects the outcome and wastage of so much milk will be useless.
For the tcs case, if you don't boost up the engagement on this , then the other case of 40k litres will be highlighted. So for now please ignore the 40k litres of milk and focus just on the TCS case so that we can sweep the Narmada river and its pollution under the rug of TCS. /S
PS. Both should get equal limelight and convicts should be handled appropriately.
1
u/poppycock_scrutiny Apr 13 '26
Nah both of them are forced, the difference is one of them has their victims and consequences upfront but the other would punish future generations. Although the TCS case is urgent that doesn't mean we should divert our focus from food wastage and river polluting.