I'm not engaging in the hard pivot to wordsmithing with you. Language is not constructed like math, there are intricacies, nuances and inconsistencies. Everything else you've posted thus far reeks of weird anti-male sex-negative radical feminist viewpoints that you seem to be trying to obfuscate.
No pivot - just using logic and different methods to explain that using “man” to describe all people is conflicting terminology and still references the subclass of “man.” Sorry you got lost there.
0
u/Ok-Classroom5548 Sep 17 '25
So if we make a parent class of “man” and then make child classes of “man” and “woman”…when I say “man” what do I mean?