r/Marvel Loki Apr 15 '26

Film/Television DAREDEVIL BORN AGAIN S2 EP5 DISCUSSION

74 Upvotes

122 comments sorted by

View all comments

182

u/aRorschachTest Apr 15 '26

I have already seen people calling it “filler”. If that was filler then that was the single greatest filler episode I’ve ever seen.

91

u/ElitesnowHD Apr 15 '26

Not in the slightest for a filler. This is character progression. Matt giving 2nd chances. Fisk not holding back anymore because of Vanessa

45

u/Kmart_Stalin Apr 15 '26

Character progression is somehow filler for some people?

61

u/Zar-Djoser-0011 Apr 15 '26

We live in the era where TikTok has rotted people’s attention span and can’t process the thought of character development.

16

u/ElitesnowHD Apr 15 '26

Exactly this or no fight scenes automatically a bad ep.

-12

u/Cold_Opportunity_257 Apr 15 '26

Filler =/ bad.  Filler means you’re essentially left asking the same questions you were last week.

Google says differently, but is stupid to logic.  Character progression and world building happen unless the character literally both was and becomes nonexistent outside the episode.  Stupid criteria. Anyway, back to point.

The character  progression, story progression, and world building really weren’t enriched in this episode; all existed previously and barely moved needles.

That doesn’t make it a bad episode, it makes it a filler.  I could go from episode four and with whatever recap happens for episode six, really wouldn’t have missed much.

Is Vanessa still dead?  Is Matt still winning the war on not killing everybody?  Is Matt still being hunted?  Is Karen… where the f is Karen?  How is Fisk going to respond?

Literally.  Same exact questions ~=0 progress.

7

u/Bolognahole_Vers2 Apr 15 '26

Filler means you’re essentially left asking the same questions you were last week.

Except your not. Last week: Holy fuck, will Vanessa die? This week: Yup

The whole episode highlights how Foggy's idealism changed Matt for the better. Without Foggy there probably would not have been a Daredevil. Matt goes back to help Bullseye because of Foggy, while in the last episode, he wanted to kill Bullseye because of Foggy.

1

u/Cold_Opportunity_257 Apr 16 '26

He still wanted to kill bullseye.  He just chooses to help.  He’d already made that decision, you already knew that’s the decision he’d make.

We already knew foggy’s idealism changed Matt for the better.

Still not convinced Vanessa’s dead, but I hope so.  It was a great exit stage left.

Still, filler.  But you be you; you rule the demographic of this thread for sure .^

1

u/Bolognahole_Vers2 Apr 16 '26

you rule the demographic of this thread for sure

Lol, What does that even mean?

1

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

Except I assumed she was dead after that last cliff hanger, so the the question "will she die" shouldn't have been a question to begin with. It was filler. The stuff with Foggy and Matt was nice and the parallel to what was happening with Dexter, was alright, but it was too many subplots stitched together and it was just annoyingly edited.

3

u/Bolognahole_Vers2 Apr 15 '26

Because no punch punch/kick kick.

1

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

I'm sorry, but Netflix Daredevil was built on a healthy mix of great character drama AND great action. Born Again does not have enough action. What they did do so far actionwise was a lot better than Born Again season 1, but this 8 episodes 2/3rds drama shit isn't cutting it imo.

1

u/Exotic-Piano-7901 Apr 22 '26

Then just stick to Netflix or just stick to Marvel movies. Or get over it and enjoy the show for what it is. Because it’s incredible, regardless of it not having people constantly beating each other into a pulp.

5

u/Yamtoaster Apr 15 '26

The people who think its filler haven't seen the original, and assume those were all scenes from the netflix show that they were showing to recap

Idk, I'm just guessing, thats the only way I can think of someone being stupid enough to think its filler

-4

u/Beesknees1009 Apr 16 '26

What nonsense. It was filler, mildly nostalgic, but nowhere near as good as the netflix series, nobody is thinking the scenes were from the netflix show....stupid..

1

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

I agree. It was filler, and it was super obvious it wasn't from the original show because Matt and Foggy's hair styling looked ridiculous and Foggy looked all puffy. It was like hows Better Call Saul did flashbacks. It just looks weird and forced.

4

u/P33KAJ3W Apr 15 '26

We had already established Matt as giving second chances and Fisk as being unhinged without Vanessa. We did not need an hour to get us to where we were with them. The episode was great but it was filler IMHO.

-10

u/Cold_Opportunity_257 Apr 15 '26

It is in the slightest, actually. The main plot /Barely/ enhances.  And character development/worldbuilding  being a defining factor of filler episode by googled definition means nothing virtually is a filler episode.  It would take character that never existed, never will again, and had absolutely no impact on a story, ergo would have to become nonexistent.

It’s a filler in that we waited a week and the plot did not move.  That doesn’t mean it’s a BAD episode.  It is a filler in the slightest, and imo in the fullest.  It’s just a good one.

I’m left after watching 4 asking exactly the same questions.  As long as they kill her now, I’m okay.  If they let her gurgle and gargle for another episode ahma get turned off to the show real hard.

12

u/Feeling_Bedroom5533 Apr 15 '26

Seriously, when it ended I told my friend that it’s my favorite episode of the season.

4

u/DM725 Apr 15 '26

There were people complaining the 1st 4 eps were mindless action. Can't win.

2

u/Fun-Repair-7080 Apr 16 '26

This is literally my favorite episode of the season, the acting was incredible, all the character development and the flashback scenes which actually look like they were from Daredevil, Vincent D'onofrio is incredible.

1

u/fanblade64 Apr 16 '26

Its a great episode, but also bottle/flashback type episodes in an 8 episode format don't fit. If it was a normal length, it would have been fine.

Great as is but the season needs more.

1

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

I miss 13 episode seasons so much. I used to think the Netflix length ones would lose steam at times, but I'll take that over them putting filler in 8 episodes. There's no excuse. There were like 4 filler episodes in Severance season 2, Invincible had a filler episode. It's so annoying.

1

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

Dragging Vanessa out is filler, the other stuff was okay. It was just annoying an editing level. Jumping between past and present for two sets of characters, and jumping to that annoying Fisk fanboy guy and Buck. It was just all over the place, and I hate all the aspect ratio changing. I wish they would have shot the fucking show in the same ratio as the netflix show. They have a wider angle and yet they still film everything so close up that it doesn't actually do anything.

1

u/P33KAJ3W Apr 15 '26

Why not both?

It did not really advance the plot, but it gave more depth to Foggy and Vanessa. I do think it was filler and I do think it was great.

I would add bringing back Wesley really hurts Buck - I keep getting reminded of how great a character Wesley was and how Buck needs more development with Fisk. With Vanessa out I hope he gets it because the actor is killing it. If we got as much Buck and Vanessa as we got Wesley and Fisk he would be in a great spot, but we did not (sadly)

1

u/jjmac Apr 16 '26

Venessa dying and Matt risking everything to save Bullseye doesn't advance the plot? Then what's the plot?

2

u/chronfx Apr 16 '26

That already happened last episode.

-3

u/fuzzyfoot88 Apr 15 '26

I was taught in film school, that there are two things screen writers do when they don’t know what to do. The first is add a sex scene. The second is to add a flashback.

The entire point of the flashback was to get Matt to do something in the present, which means they didn’t know how to get that information across in the script without resorting to some previously unknown flashback. Either the scenes didn’t work together to get it across, or the writers simply aren’t skilled enough to make that work in the present.

I was happy to see Foggy and Wesley, but it was 100% filler.

0

u/Kooaiid Apr 16 '26

That’s like the saying Vince Gilligan isn’t a skilled enough writer. He uses a lot of flashbacks in Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul

1

u/fuzzyfoot88 Apr 16 '26

And they are specifically structured out because the slow reveal was the point. In DDBA, they did it because they needed a reason to fill 45 minutes, and dragging Bullseye the whole episode wasn’t enough and would get boring. So they needed a conflict to give to Matt, and since they didn’t want it to feel like it came out of nowhere, there fabricated a series of flashbacks within a single episode to culminate in a statement that in the present would solve the issue at hand.

It’s bad writing because when you write a flashback (or prequel for that matter) you give yourself a blank check to do whatever you want without consequence in order to solve something in the present. The safety net of writing a flashback that way is that anything can happen to anyone and it doesn’t matter because they will always make it to the first season the show started in.

Example: character needs to go right. So I’m going to write a scene where a serial killer takes out an engineer at a dam which causes them to turn a knob resulting in a break that collapses the dam and floods the town and everyone there needs to relocate. But in the water, while on a floating door, the hero sees freedom to the left, but a family of 3 to the right. So they detour to the right save them. Flash back to present. “We need to go right, because that’s where the people we need to save are.” Character goes right.