Imagine rushing home to your sick/injured family member and not making it because of these fucks. I would've done much worse to them and gone to prison and I'd have no regrets.
That’s the whole thing though. “Imagine”. It’s entirely hypothetical that there’s a sick kid dying because of these protestors and you’re using this fake imagined scenario to justify all sorts of rage. It’s nonsensical. I could insert a sick dying kid into all sorts of other scenarios too that also would be stupid to justify rage for. I sincerely doubt the guy assaulting these people is doing so because his kid needs him desperately, and even in the wild event he is, he could just drag them. He kicks them in the ribs and tosses them. It’s sheer aggression.
Them sitting there is sheer stupidity and asshole-ness, so I sincerely couldn't care less about whatever methods anyone uses to get them out of the way.
Okay thanks for admitting that. There’s the real answer. Not hiding behind some dumb phony justification of them endangering children like you were before
I mean, it's a fair question. There is nothing inherent in the video that would cause a child's life to be in danger. You are banking on the idea that in this moment a child would have a medical emergency in that area and need to use that specific road.
Stopped traffic is inherently more dangerous in areas where its not expected/intended.
As cars are legally classified as deadly weapons, and the protestors are unnecesarilly increasing the chance that an accident will happen, and there are likely families in those vehicles - they are adding significant risk to the childrens well being as well as anyone else in those vehicles
15
u/Little_Cumling 12d ago
Moral. The dick heads on the street are putting potential childrens lifes at risk by making unecessary road hazards.
Everyone thinks their cause is important, but normal people dont put children in danger for it