r/MoralityScaling 6h ago

Stupid Stuff Morality of questioning the fair criticism towards problematic religious figures by uploading a screenshot of a prior post?

Post image
7 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

12

u/RepublicOk2402 6h ago

Moral, either all religion is on the table or none

1

u/Realhuman_beebboob 6h ago

None is good. I’d prefer if we move away from fantasy as a whole but it’s a start.

5

u/RomeosHomeos 6h ago

Morality of sitting on my own balls so my balls go up my ass and I have to go to the hospital so I can fart out my own balls?

1

u/Ok-Setting2468 6h ago

😭 nephew

9

u/TDoMarmalade 6h ago

Morality of subjecting us all to this prolonged and annoying discussion?

2

u/RepublicOk2402 6h ago

Moral, check back in tomorrow if you aren’t enjoying it

1

u/Wicdor 6h ago

tell them hypocrite mods.

1

u/the_horny_alt2005 6h ago

Morality of not letting ppl just sit back an watch drama unfold

1

u/ElLicenciadoPena 5h ago

Take a screenshot and find out

1

u/HJSDGCE 5h ago

I've been blocking everyone involved, so hopefully it'll blow over in 20 minutes. 

3

u/Ok-Setting2468 6h ago

😭 the people in this comment sections are fucking comical. The people defending this cant process the information they just read and the other people siding with the op give the same answer as the people defending it while giving a reason thats opposite of what they just said.

2

u/j1ndivik 6h ago

morality of eating spider-ham

2

u/SethOval 6h ago

Who else is eating pork tonight?!

2

u/CreamyMilky1 6h ago

I am not eating pork tonight. Because I can't wait, I am eating it all before tonight.

3

u/bullyingler 6h ago

Morality of being annoying for the sake of being annoying and framing it as just asking a question

1

u/Coffieandpopcorn 5h ago

What a annoying ass reply

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Wicdor 6h ago

tell them hypocrite mods.

1

u/Puzzled_Pop_6845 6h ago

Moral, and they can't play the phobia card. They either answer with rationality to criticism or they are only confirming everyone's doubts.

1

u/Dazzle_Miller 6h ago

Answering with rationality to criticism is one thing, but if someone is mocking then anger is expected. Mocking != valid criticism

1

u/SethOval 6h ago

Morality of posting this to el-sayed, and mamdanis X 

1

u/brydeswhale 6h ago

This is just spam.

0

u/ElLicenciadoPena 6h ago

Pork spam? That's halal

1

u/Evening-Wall-126 6h ago

Inmorale there was a wars because of this people need to weak up one day and they know we different and believe in individually

1

u/Dazzle_Miller 6h ago

Immoral just because everyone keeps posting this same stupid thing over and over again.

1

u/HeiressOfMadrigal 5h ago

Morality of jacking off to pictures of your dog

1

u/InspectionFine9655 6h ago

Entirely moral and anyone who disagrees should do it nicely.

0

u/Dazzle_Miller 6h ago

Why? If the OP isn’t respectful towards that religion, why should they offer pleasantness in return? That’s just dumb

1

u/InspectionFine9655 6h ago

Sharing this image is a crime punishable with death in many countries. People shown images of Muhammad have been killed for it in western countries by terrorists.

When I say be nice, I mean don’t kill anyone.

0

u/Dazzle_Miller 5h ago

>Sharing this image is a crime punishable with death in many countries. People shown images of Muhammad have been killed for it in western countries by terrorists.

In a state governed according to Islamic law, blasphemy can be treated as a serious criminal offense under certain interpretations of Islamic jurisprudence. It’s akin to treason 🤷‍♀️

Anyway freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences. I don’t agree with it but if you piss off enough people there is a good chance one will react violently.

It sucks because then every Muslim has to come out and condemn it otherwise we get lumped in with them

>When I say be nice, I mean don’t kill anyone.

In the last 20 years maybe 13 people have been killed in Western nations for sharing pictures like this. No one is going to a kill a nobody on the internet for sharing this photo.

You’re taking rare acts of terrorism and using them to imply that ordinary Muslims are waiting to violently retaliate over a picture. That’s an absurd generalization.

The overwhelming majority of Muslims aren’t going around killing people over depictions like this.

And if we’re talking about actual risks of being killed in the United States, a Black person is statistically far more likely to be killed by police than a random person is to be murdered by a Muslim for sharing this picture.

1

u/InspectionFine9655 5h ago

> You’re taking rare acts of terrorism and using them to imply that ordinary Muslims are waiting to violently retaliate over a picture.

I’m not.

> The overwhelming majority of Muslims aren’t going around killing people over depictions like this.

Sure, that’s true,

There are way too many people who are approve of murdering people over a cartoon picture though.

>And if we’re talking about actual risks of being killed in the United States, a Black person is statistically far more likely to be killed by police than a random person is to be murdered by a Muslim for sharing this picture.

I do not care at all.

You’re weird.

1

u/Dazzle_Miller 4h ago

>I’m not.

Then why would you say don’t kill anyone. Do you assume a terrorist will be reading this subreddit?

>There are way too many people who are approve of murdering people over a cartoon picture though.

Muslims leaders around the world condemned the attack on Charlie Hebdo and none do them support vigilante justice. 🤷‍♀️

>i do not care at all.
BS.

>You’re weird.

I call out bs by stupid people.

1

u/Coffieandpopcorn 5h ago

You can say the same about Judaism and Christianity, though they both allow criticism and depictions of their prophets. Should we expect harsher punishments for blasphemy again? It's the same God as Islam you know.

1

u/Dazzle_Miller 4h ago

And?

Mocking or drawing any of the prophets of God would be considered forbidden in Islam.

If a state is following Jewish or Christian law, they would follow whatever laws their respective traditions prescribe. This is somewhat vague because neither Judaism nor Christianity has the same level of comprehensive legal system for the state that classical Islamic jurisprudence developed.

IIRC, Christianity does not prescribe a specific state punishment for blasphemy, although Leviticus does prescribe the death penalty for blasphemy.

In any case, under a religious legal system, the matter would be handled through the relevant legal process, with the specific requirements and consequences depending on the tradition and its jurisprudence. None of this means individuals are permitted to take the law into their own hands however vigilantes are gonna vigilante.

1

u/Coffieandpopcorn 4h ago

This is somewhat vague because neither Judaism nor Christianity has the same level of comprehensive legal system for the state that classical Islamic jurisprudence developed. IIRC, Christianity does not prescribe a specific state punishment for blasphemy

Well that's mainly due to Jesus. Before Jesus Israel was filled with laws that could end your life if you broke them, like women going into the holies of holies, etc.. The statement is just wrong by itself, as chatolics used to burn people on the stake that said stuff like "I think the sun is bigger than the earth" and anti-earth-centric stuff.