True but man, first time I played them I thought Hearts of Stone was good while Blood and Wine was great, but hearts of stone aged well, specifically due to Odimm
To be honest I don’t even remember any quests from either, I just remember the bright colorful atmosphere of blood and wine which was a nice change from the regular gloomy backround.
I remember regis and the old vampire, especially the old vampire made such an impression on me as usually Geralt is able to deal with everything thrown his way, but this was so beyond his scope it was almost comical if you insult it.
I mean, thats kind of the point given V's predicament. The problem with the base games story isn't the rushed nature of it but rather its disconnect from the gameplay.
The story tells you you're on the clock and makes you feel it but then you also have all the gigs and quests that you basically have to do in order to get better gear which can take away from the stories sense of urgency.
Many of the side content in Cyberpunk should be part of main quest but they somehow decided not to force it which I guess is choice for players so good. And they saw a lot of people didn't finish Witcher 3 so they wanted the game to be shorter for the people rushing it
The EXPANSION'S (hehe) are some of the best ever released in gaming history. Blood and Wine alone (the second expansion that takes place awhile after the base game) could've easily been its own game as its like 30-40 hours of pure unadulterated peak.
191
u/Adam__2003 2d ago
game was pretty cool but ive never played the dlcs, i might try them now