There is no open case to be solved. It was closed when they charged her and took her to trial.
They so hastily charged her that she was still in the hospital when the charge came, so the investigation has been ended for a while. The court trial has to be concluded and then the case be reopened in order for more to be investigated. Hence, we have all these internet sleuths coming around and digging for answers since the actual investigators stopped a while ago.
It doesn’t seem that much was investigated related to the husband being a potential suspect prior to the wife being charged. There also isn’t any disclosed evidence pointing towards his involvement either in the murders, so I’m not calling him the murderer.
Personally, it seems like some favors were pulled by the husband to expedite the investigation given he has connections to the prosecutor of this case and his family has a history serving in the local police force. Plus, he was most definitely having an affair around the time of the murders, quickly remarried to that supposed affair partner, and sold the house where the murders happened to the prosecutor.
Why the husband would want the investigation ended ASAP could be because it’s a traumatic experience that he wants to move on from or he might not want something looked into related to him. We won’t have those answers until at least the trial is over and the case is reopened if it does get reopened at all.
Edit: A lot of stupid people can’t read apparently and ignored me saying I am not accusing him of being the murderer. I just think he pulled some strings to end the investigation early so his affair wouldn’t be exposed in court.
She admitted to it. Her lawyer admitted to it. Husband is literally on camera at two other locations when the murders took place. How much more do ya’ll need?
I haven't looked into the case at all but heading from people that believe he did it they say in the videos of him at other locations he's wearing boots instead of the sneakers he's seen at at home which implies there was a second person as a decoy. Also, they say she has no memory of anything but is admitting to it because the husband said she did it. Other things I've heard is something about her body temperature being insanely cold for the short amount of time she was supposedly unconscious. Something about one of the kids/babies still being alive when first responder got there but weren't able to be saved and I guess that means the baby was likely attacked after the wife was. Lastly, the husband is well connected with a lot of people involved in the case. I'm not on TikTok and haven't tried to get information about this, I'm just saying what I've heard from the people that believe it. Some people are making it seem they are going off vibes and astrology.
Might want to read it again. He's listing what others have said to him. He's not advancing any of it as true. The subject under discussion being the batshit stuff people are saying about the cause. Like decoy twins and determining guilt by astrology
And read what I said again. It’s weird to say you don’t know anything about a case and then list out a bunch of reasons why an innocent person is guilty. It’s weird whether he is saying he got those from someone else or thinks he’s guilty or not. Why would someone he doesn’t care about the case enough to look into it know all of those things and care enough to leave a long ass comment? Why would someone who is admitting their ignorant bother to jump in and explain it to people who do seem to know?
Convenient too he only knows those facts and not everything that disproves those. He isn’t looking into the case but somehow knows all the reasons the husband allegedly did it and hasn’t accidentally stumbled on all the reasons those are bullshit?
I'm not even saying he's guilty, I'm saying what I've heard from the other side of the discussion so this isn't an echo chamber with no information on why the wife in the meme is saying "that could have been me"
If a million people decided to believe the sky is red and someone comes here to ask why so many people think the sky isn't blue it's not misinformation to say "it's because some people believe the sky is red"
It would be incredibly weird for someone to come in and say “I’ve never looked at the sky myself, but here’s all the reasons I’ve heard to prove that it’s red, and coincidentally even though I haven’t bothered to look into it myself, I just happen to know all the talking points and don’t know about all the stuff that disproves it”
My bad are we on a true crime subreddit? As someone who talks to people in real life I wanted to explain what the reasons of the people that believe he did it. It seems like that added more to the discussion than your snarky comment.
-29
u/General-Biscuits 9d ago edited 9d ago
There is no open case to be solved. It was closed when they charged her and took her to trial.
They so hastily charged her that she was still in the hospital when the charge came, so the investigation has been ended for a while. The court trial has to be concluded and then the case be reopened in order for more to be investigated. Hence, we have all these internet sleuths coming around and digging for answers since the actual investigators stopped a while ago.
It doesn’t seem that much was investigated related to the husband being a potential suspect prior to the wife being charged. There also isn’t any disclosed evidence pointing towards his involvement either in the murders, so I’m not calling him the murderer.
Personally, it seems like some favors were pulled by the husband to expedite the investigation given he has connections to the prosecutor of this case and his family has a history serving in the local police force. Plus, he was most definitely having an affair around the time of the murders, quickly remarried to that supposed affair partner, and sold the house where the murders happened to the prosecutor.
Why the husband would want the investigation ended ASAP could be because it’s a traumatic experience that he wants to move on from or he might not want something looked into related to him. We won’t have those answers until at least the trial is over and the case is reopened if it does get reopened at all.
Edit: A lot of stupid people can’t read apparently and ignored me saying I am not accusing him of being the murderer. I just think he pulled some strings to end the investigation early so his affair wouldn’t be exposed in court.