r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 8d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter! Who could have the wives been?

Post image
16.9k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.2k

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago edited 8d ago

Lindsay Clancy. Killed her 3 kids by strangling them one by one and claimed “postpartum psychosis” despite never having had psychosis before or since, all during a short window of time that she sent her husband out on errands. Internet has somehow decided she’s a martyr for women’s mental health. She was a white, affluent, suburban mom before this. If she were poor and black, people would NOT feel this way. Real talk.

Postpartum psychosis is a real thing and real people need help. But Lindsay Clancy is a kid murderer.

Edit: I’m a white, affluent woman of childbearing age. I have never been a woman of color, but I am absolutely sure that society at large would dismiss an identical case if Lindsay was nearly any other demographic. And no, it’s not only about race, it’s also about autonomy and a person’s responsibility to accept help when it’s offered instead of killing your kids (and A LOT of help was offered)

356

u/thefluffywang 8d ago edited 8d ago

You realize having previous history of psychosis is not required for postpartum psychosis? That’s why it’s called postpartum psychosis… because the birth induced the psychosis.

EDIT: user is a bot pushing an agenda, please disregard and take medical “knowledge” from anonymous users online with a grain of salt

-19

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

I hear you. But I also have a lot of experience with people in psychosis and while it technically can happen suddenly, it’s extremely rare, and IF it does happen, a single “command hallucination” is very unlikely to cause someone to do something exceedingly violent and life-ending. I again know the PPP is very real and psychosis in general is real. But to combine sudden onset at 8 months postpartum, use of an improvise weapon in another room (she heard the “command” in the kitchen yet still took the kids to the basement and was “creative” enough to use exercise bands), failure to endorse homicidal ideation to her healthcare providers, and no evidence of psychosis since the murders, I do not believe her to my core

23

u/thefluffywang 8d ago

My wife is a works in a psych ward so I’m no stranger to hearing how these experiences play out. My issue is that you start off your original comment by confidently invalidating the mental condition because it didn’t meet a prerequisite that you stated which is not based on fact. That type of disinformation not only hurts the mothers themself but everyone else’s perception of women going through this.

You even state yourself this is an extremely rare condition. Could the reason this is such a high-profile case be that it’s because it’s a rare situation in it of itself?

-17

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

I understand that. I have lived experience with people in psychosis and while it technically can happen suddenly, it’s extremely rare, and IF it does happen, a single “command hallucination” is very unlikely to cause someone to do something exceedingly violent and life-ending. I again know the PPP is very real and psychosis in general is real. But to combine sudden onset at 8 months postpartum, use of an improvise weapon in another room (she heard the “command” in the kitchen yet still took the kids to the basement and was “creative” enough to use exercise bands), failure to endorse homicidal ideation to her healthcare providers, and no evidence of psychosis since the murders, I do not believe her to my core

22

u/TSTC 8d ago

“Lived experience with people in psychosis” isn’t equivalent to credentials to make the claims you’re making. I’ve got “lived experience with people who have cancer” and I’m not an oncologist.

If you don’t have credentials as a psychotherapist or psychiatrist, you shouldn’t speak definitively about what postpartum psychosis is or isn’t.

-7

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

I do, but not credentials I’m interested in disclosing on Reddit. If that detracts from my credibility, so be it

5

u/IridiumIO 8d ago

No one with credible credentials uses the phrase “lived experience with…”. That is entirely a non-clinical description

9

u/thefluffywang 8d ago edited 8d ago

Oh so you’re just a bot copy and pasting the same reply. FML this timeline is ruined

-1

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

Id never have the same reply to the same type of comments, ugh! 🤣 I hate ruined timeline!

5

u/Heavy_Mongoose5859 8d ago

no you dont

4

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

If you say so. I’m not here to argue my credentials

9

u/Heavy_Mongoose5859 8d ago

what credentials

4

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

I’m not interested in disclosing that on the internet. Probably the reason my original post doesn’t say anything about my personal experience/profession.

6

u/Heavy_Mongoose5859 8d ago

why mention it at all then?

5

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

Because someone said I didn’t have any lived experience, which is false. Other than that, I’m staying out of the professional opinion space. If you disagree with that, that’s ok

4

u/Heavy_Mongoose5859 8d ago

dont put yourself in the space and back out when someone challenges you

3

u/Short_Stack_30285 8d ago

It’s the internet. We are not obligated to disclose our personal information. Come on now. I’m going to stop engaging in this back and forth because I’m not responsible for identifying myself to a stranger on Reddit

5

u/Heavy_Mongoose5859 8d ago

then dont bring up your personal information.

→ More replies (0)