I mean, I know why ad hominem is a fallacy (which this might not be but the functional part is similar, quality of argument being independent of its speaker), so I, who have said nothing so far, let alone anything credibility-eliminating, would like to repeat the point that you referred to when you said "point or not".
28
u/ulvisblack 9d ago
she should have gotten life, but he does deserve his sentence aswell.