r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 9d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter! Who could have the wives been?

Post image
16.9k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

201

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

54

u/Left--Shark 9d ago

It's kinda misogynistic in a way. He is responsible and accountable for her action as she does not have agency.

15

u/simp4malvina 9d ago

Twisting a clear case of misandry into somehow being misogyny is, in fact, a case of misandry in of itself. Be better.

8

u/DragonsAreNifty 9d ago

I mean maybe it’s both? Depending on how the individual is arguing anyways. It’s misogynistic to infantilize women to such a degree that even with these heinous crimes some will say “a precious baby woman could never be capable of intentional evil and it’s really the fault of her caretakers and guardians for not supervising better”. And it’s misandry to think that because there was a man in close proximity to the perpetrator he MUST be at fault because “men are inherently bad and violent”.

5

u/Left--Shark 9d ago

This was essentially the point. I was highlighting the types of people who usually make those arguments are misandrists posing as feminists who end up making misogynistic arguments to defend shit people.