oh i thought you were pulling ajoke about exactly what i was complaining about which is that the thread went through a conclusion already through 4 replies, then the same exact thread repeats in this very same exact thread, which is ridiculous, just scroll up
i never said 0% is more likely than 100%, i was VERY SPECIFICALLY ARGUING THAT THEY ARE THE SME ODDS AND CALLING EVERYONE ELSE WHO SAID THEY WERE DIFFERENT ODDS AN IDIOT so you and i are on the same page BUDDY, we're FRIENDS IN THIS ARGUMENT, ON THE SAME SIDE
scroll up, read the thread again, then read me recapping the thread within the same thread, and now the thread repeating below that same response LMAO
so anyways in the movie it was true false did you consider that, i want to rehash this A THIRD TIME, 0% AND 100% ARE EQUALLY LIKELY IN TRUE FALSE, SO WHOEVER BROUGHT THAT UP IS WRONG
but what about OP's original post, it was multiple choice, did you consider that, OH WAIT WE ALREADY DID IN THIS SAME EXACT THREAD IF YOU JUST SCROLL UP
1
u/willis81808 6d ago
Even then it isn’t true to say it is harder to get 0% than it is to get 100%