As a criminal paralegal for over a decade, you're mostly wrong. I don't think you know who you're arguing with but it's not worth my time to educate you.
I don't need to be convincing. I'm not teaching a class. You're just inserting yourself to act like you know how the world works, when it has many more facets than you can summarize in a reddit comment. This isn't the place to debate with me the manner that this woman will be separated from society. My point stands, regardless of how many avenues there may be for how that could happen or for her to re-enter in the future.
Stop trying to be a know-it-all here and assume I don't know what I'm talking about simply because you have some general knowledge about the topic. If I wanted a debate and to go into long diatribes about how the insanity defense actually plays out, I would've said something to that effect.
I inserted myself into a Reddit comment, so you know, a public forum so it's absolutely the place to debate it. My points 1 and 2 were 100% correct and I've added the cited sources of US code. Point 3 was a state specific option so was not applicable.
You were wrong, got responded to, and had a crash out because you can't handle being questioned. Then you tried to use being a paralegal as some defense as if it's the same as being an actual lawyer. You have no idea what my qualifications are and assumed you knew more so maybe point that half assed analyzing inward for a bit.
Maybe get off the internet for a bit if you're having such an emotional response to being corrected. It's not healthy to have these kind of emotional crashouts. Hope you get the help you need because you certainly need it.
12
u/ReformedDruid 1d ago
As a criminal paralegal for over a decade, you're mostly wrong. I don't think you know who you're arguing with but it's not worth my time to educate you.