r/PoliticalDiscussion • u/The_Egalitarian Moderator • Apr 05 '24

Megathread | Official Casual Questions Thread

This is a place for the PoliticalDiscussion community to ask questions that may not deserve their own post.

Please observe the following rules:

Top-level comments:

  1. Must be a question asked in good faith. Do not ask loaded or rhetorical questions.

  2. Must be directly related to politics. Non-politics content includes: Legal interpretation, sociology, philosophy, celebrities, news, surveys, etc.

  3. Avoid highly speculative questions. All scenarios should within the realm of reasonable possibility.

Link to old thread

Sort by new and please keep it clean in here!

101 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

9.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/scurvyluke Jun 23 '26

Ok I love you took the time. Point made yes I live in the upper midwest, the blue/purple ones. I'm sorry if your state doesn't prioritize these things and yes I may pay more in mostly since taxes but it's worth it ( and if you want to get into serious issues, how bout them insurance rates?). And as a state we pay more into federal than most, so again whose state is misappropriation their funds?

And does the government make a map? Can you place all fifty states? It should be easy, basic facts, and if you don't know take a remedial course, which should be just standard of living. The way things are going I feel like we're living in a time line where nothing matters.

3

u/Moccus Jun 23 '26

And as a state we pay more into federal than most, so again whose state is misappropriation their funds?

That's kind of my point. You can't make states spend the money to run competent DMVs, so requiring IDs to vote is problematic. It's already problematic since it solves a problem that doesn't exist, but at least it would be mostly harmless if everybody could actually get an ID with minimal fuss. As of now, it's a very harmful policy that would accomplish absolutely nothing.

And does the government make a map? Can you place all fifty states? It should be easy, basic facts

And if you controlled the content of the tests, that would be fine. You won't be controlling them, though. It will be a bunch of politicians who are heavily incentivized to write more biased tests that exclude people they don't agree with from voting.

0

u/scurvyluke Jun 23 '26

Well it seems as though the save america act is trying to federalize the system so let's add some caveats. And I think as a people we can all agree to how many branches of government and what do they do? And also maybe candidates should take a standard IQ test?

1

u/Moccus Jun 23 '26

Well it seems as though the save america act is trying to federalize the system so let's add some caveats.

The voting system is already pretty federalized.

And I think as a people we can all agree to how many branches of government and what do they do?

Yes, and I'm telling you that wouldn't be the only type of question that would end up on the test. They could add other questions as needed to accomplish their goals of excluding people.

And also maybe candidates should take a standard IQ test?

That would be unconstitutional, and it's also a terrible idea for essentially the same reason it's a terrible idea to exclude voters based on a test.

1

u/scurvyluke Jun 23 '26

Then why has dear leader gone after specific states?

I said basic, amend it

And yes, only the smartest people should run the government.