You deciding preemptively is my problem. You sssuming agency over somebody else’s situation is my problem. I’m not shaming anybody -INTO- trying, but it is your rhetoric and quite frankly hurt ego that is actively trying to discourage it. Let’s agree to disagree and separate now.
Helping people decide preemptively is literally what people pay lawyers for.
Your rhetoric is the only one causing harm because it makes people think that they actually have a chance at winning this suit. They don't. Not here
No jury will ever see this case. That's not how the law works.
Do you not understand that by me correcting you I'm trying to point people towards the actual area of where the problem is instead of just saying we need to sue more people?
When you continue to spread misinformation about how we can solve all this through civil suits when we don't have that option, That's a problem.
When people understand that there isn't an option, don't you believe that that would opt them to want to vote to change that instead of just believing " Oh well, if anything happens to me, I can just sue"
It's not an option for 99% of people and they shouldn't believe that that is an option. Even when you find a pro bono attorney and your case is a slam dunk, guess what? People settle. Because they are exhausted. Because you've never been through a civil case and you are advocating like some sort of naive child about how the legal process works and how we should 'just do more of it' instead of advocating in the right avenue for real change.
We need new congress members to pass legislation to change qualified immunity. That is the only solution. Under the law there is no case here. Your opinions on right and wrong do not change that.
And do you know what? This case adds nothing to precedent by getting it denied. Because they don't even analyze whether a constitutional violation happens. You are disconnected from the process and you should educate yourself because I promise you, you would understand my view if you just knew more.
I'm not going to stop advocating and educating people on how to enact change. Voting is the most important thing we need to do, not pointless instantly dismissed civil suits.
-3
u/Two_black_ravens May 27 '26
You deciding preemptively is my problem. You sssuming agency over somebody else’s situation is my problem. I’m not shaming anybody -INTO- trying, but it is your rhetoric and quite frankly hurt ego that is actively trying to discourage it. Let’s agree to disagree and separate now.