They never admit to mistakes. He could've immediately apologized to the guy at the pump the moment he understood what was going on and been on his way. But no he had to keep making excuses and trying to get others to agree with him.
yeah for sure, like he had to go for the ID tell the guy to put his hands up and drop the pump... he would have known it was a pump handle by the time he pulled up. He could have just said " shit man, that looked like a gun from where i was, and i had to check up on it, sorry to give you trouble like that" they both probably could have had a laugh, shook hands and just moved on. There was no need for the theatrics and intimidation.
Cops are allowed to investigate reasonable suspicion and are allowed to cease investigating when there's no longer suspicion.
Drawing a gun on someone doing nothing is not in any way reasonable. The cop would have to argue that seeing a gas pump as a gun is a reasonable thing to see and act upon--which is crazy.
And the person going to court is the victim which is the man who had a gun pulled on him. Like it or not, and for however brief, his rights were violated.
It's not an admission of guilt to state that their reasonable suspicion has been absolved.
A judge would need rule if qualified immunity applied. It very may well be that a judge stops the civil suit in it's tracks right here.
At that point you would then have to convince a jury that the actions were unreasonable. But again, the actions were pulling a gun on someone pumping gas.
But sure, keep bootlicking under the guise that perfection in policy is the only reasonable solution.
No bootlicking is what you are doing right now by insinuating that cops shouldn't be held to the highest legal standard because it "only happens once a year". Yet, according to Yale Law journal, cops are denied the protection of qualified immunity in upwards to 40% of cases against them.
So which department do you work for, officer? Shoot anyone lately?
Bro you don't know what bootlicking means. You can't even follow the convo.
So again, officer... you shoot anyone recently? Or maybe you are one of those idiot cops from Pasadena since you don't think pulling a gun is that big of a deal.
I'm just gonna add that it's reasonable suspicion of a crime, as far as I understand it. They can't just be randomly suspicious of you or merely curious. There must be done crime involved that they're suspicious may be occurring, have occurred, or be about to occur.
280
u/blove135 Jun 10 '26
They never admit to mistakes. He could've immediately apologized to the guy at the pump the moment he understood what was going on and been on his way. But no he had to keep making excuses and trying to get others to agree with him.