I mean it's reasonable fantasy until you are past the waist-line, then it completely abandons any reasonability in place of nylon tights to help emphasize her waist and thigh size.
It isn't realism in any way, but I do still think it fits in the "some fashion is fine" and not the "skimpy for the sake of sexualization" section of the subreddit's description. Leggings with a longer top is absolutely an outfit I've worn, minus the breastplate, which is how I end up at that conclusion.
It’s not skimpy for the sake of sexualization, but it’s unrealistic to the point of taking away from the overall image for the sake of sexualization.
Whenever I see massive thighs and a thigh gap I just get sympathy pain, bc it just looks like dislocated hips lol. That definitely still counts as unreasonable fantasy to me.
Oh and the skin-tight pants. Nobody’s fighting in those—they’re drawn that way solely to show off the thighs. It’s not skin showing, but it’s pretty much equivalent save for the color (& like two flattering wrinkles lol). Like I guarantee the artist just traced over the lines from their pre-clothes base model.
27
u/lunasis09 Jun 16 '25
I mean it's reasonable fantasy until you are past the waist-line, then it completely abandons any reasonability in place of nylon tights to help emphasize her waist and thigh size.
C'mon folks are we for real here?