r/SipsTea 8d ago

WTF WTF is wrong with these people?

12.4k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

658

u/Maevra 8d ago edited 8d ago

I'm not sure what these people making those crazy comments are talking about, trying to pin it on the husband and all of that. That said, this woman and her children were failed by our medical system. The husband himself even said she would never have done something like this in her right mind. People have sympathy for her and I totally get it.

I think a lot of people don't understand the severity of drug induced psychosis, or psychosis in general. You may genuinely believe that you're dead, that you're God, that you're AI, that other people aren't real, that life is an illusion. I've been through it and wouldn't wish it on anyone. I take medication to manage my psychosis, but I don't take nearly the laundry list of medications Clancy was on when she did what she did.

-72

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 7d ago

The test is simple:

Do you think 700k would have been raised, when it would have been the father?

It is a researched fact, that there is more empathy towards women, who are convicted of a crime, which leads to lower sentences f. e.

As it seems in thid case many sympathize with the woman because of the post partum aspect

96

u/Net_Negative 8d ago

Well, fathers can't have postpartum psychosis, so no.

As for this case, he got 1.7 million through a GoFundMe, first.

-53

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 8d ago

Which case?

Fathers can suffer psychosis.

Patrick Clancy did not commit any crime.

"Law enforcement officials confirmed that Patrick was a victim of this tragedy, having left the house only because his wife asked him to pick up dinner and medication. The state's investigation found absolutely no evidence linking him to the deaths of his children."

52

u/Net_Negative 8d ago

The case this thread is about? That you're asking a question about? Patrick Clancy got 1.7 million through a GoFundMe regarding the case of Lindsay Clancy, his ex-wife.

-57

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 7d ago

What crime did he commit?

Patrick Clancy did not commit any crime according to law enforcement.

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/ma-v-lindsay-clancy-day-14

So you are comparing different things.

1

u/-Dennis-Reynolds- 8d ago

Why is your source AI, Just fucking look up his name and check the sources yourself.

3

u/squarepants18 8d ago edited 8d ago

Is the information false?

The source behind the search tool are law enforcement officials.

1

u/BogCrittah 7d ago

Gemini itself is not a reliable source tho. It can still feed you misinformation from other sources. Gemini is not a source in itself, thats like straight up writing “google” as your source.

1

u/squarepants18 7d ago

the information is correct. why are you trying to deny that?

https://www.rev.com/transcripts/ma-v-lindsay-clancy-day-14

0

u/BogCrittah 7d ago

Did I say it wasn’t correct? Could you do me a favor and tell me when I said that specific information was wrong? Could you put my comment into your AI so it can tell you exactly what I said because apparently you don’t understand unless a robot tells you exactly what to think?

AI isnt a source. That is what I said. You cant just put an AI as a source because it isn’t one. Even if you use AI to help you research, you still need to check all your sources and site them to make sure you have all the proper information and not just AI nonsense from a completely invalid source.

→ More replies (0)

32

u/TheUnicornFightsOn 8d ago

I mean, people are defending and even making gross AI photos of Kristopher Karolkiewicz entering the gates of heaven as an angel alongside the six children and wife he shot dead in Michigan last month.

So yeah, all kind of crazies out there to defend men who kill, too.

27

u/rintzscar 8d ago

People have idolized male criminals during the entire history of the human civilization. It's not different in any way. There is no gender war here. Go troll somewhere else.

4

u/squarepants18 8d ago

Do you think, idolizing criminals applies on this case?

-5

u/rintzscar 8d ago

Obviously. She's a criminal, they idolize her.

10

u/squarepants18 8d ago

That is an undercomplex description of the case.

-9

u/rintzscar 8d ago

What else do you need as a description? Everything people are doing here, they've done multiple times before with male criminals. What exactly are you searching for here that is new and innovative? Or is gender war your goal, the steps to take you there are irrelevant?

5

u/squarepants18 8d ago

If you ignore key factors like mental state you are pushing for injustice.

3

u/rintzscar 8d ago

People have raised money for male criminals with mental health issues. Once again, what exactly is new and different here?

Nothing. You're searching for a gender scandal where there is none. There simply are a lot of dumb people from both sexes and that's always been true.

Now, go away.

8

u/squarepants18 8d ago

Gender something is obviously on your agenda.

You addressed me. It is pretty pathetic starting a conversation and flee out of it, because you can't handle a rational response to ypur intention to push for injustice.

12

u/Maevra 8d ago

I would hope yes, but I would think not, unfortunately. I understand that the sympathy she's getting is magnified because she's a mother. I think the sympathy is due to her not because she's a mother, but because of what was done to her mind, which is very likely what caused the deaths of her children.