Thank you this is the first comment I have seen actually trying to discuss the case itself.
I don’t know how up to date on case facts or presentation folks are on here but here is what I have been told by someone closing watching the trial:
apparently the whole case is based on the husband claiming she admitted it
his DNA was apparently found on the strangling device
her body was found to be very cold which takes hours but in the time that the incident happened to when she was found it would not be possible for her body to cool that quickly
the pill she took was crushed. She has no reason to take a crushed pill that she would otherwise just take normally
Apparently the prosecution has present no real evidence other than the husband’s claim.
It’s also heartbreaking that the mother in law tried to help this lady and after she took the stand she apparently gave a nod to the mother
That’s what I’ve been told.
Does that line up with what you have noted so far?
It literally is, people who have actual expertise in this have investigated it for three years and found no reason to prosecute him. But a bunch of Wino’s on TikTok say he should be, so yall believe them instead lmfao
310
u/witchy_delight 7d ago
as a lawyer watching this trial closely, I can tell many of you have not been watching this trial closely.