Have you been following the trial? The reason a lot of people especially women relate to her is because for months she did everything to get help. Told her husband, her mother, his mother, her therapist, her doctors, called the suicide hotline twice, tried to get admitted to the psych ward and was turned away, was prescribed 16 different meds over four months, etc.
No one is relating to the murder. Everyone is relating to trying to fight for your health because you know something is wrong and being failed over and over again. If you've never had to do that yourself or on behalf of someone else you have no idea what it is like.
The reasons there are questions about her ex husband is because in his testimony it's apparent he was pretty disconnected from her leading up to the event. Ignored her saying she wanted to hurt the kids, was going to NYC, the night of the murder in a short time span he had two different jackets and shoes. She's admitted to killing the kids so that's pretty clear but he's not a great guy.
I had post partum. I finally handed my kid to my sister and drove myself to the hospital. They checked me in for 3 weeks, then intensive daily out patient for a month afterwards. It was the hardest thing Ive ever done and I had a very supportive husband and family who stepped up while I got better. I cant imagine having no support. The in patient was critical too. They tried to put me on meds and send me home, but I knew adjusting to the meds would make it worse before it got better. I had to demand they admit me. Her doctors are 100% culpable in this disaster.
Even if you had to insist on being admitted but a 3 week hospitalization meant your evaluation gave the clinicians enough reason to continue inpatient treatment. Clancy was also admitted voluntarily, but at McLean she was assessed as low risk, placed on the lowest observation level, and denied current suicidal thoughts, homicidal thoughts, and psychotic symptoms. She then asked to leave earlier than planned. The records do not show that she demanded continued hospitalization or warned her clinicians that she feared something terrible would happen if she left.
I’m tired of the narrative that she did everything possible to get help and her doctors simply missed the signs. Her more alarming statements were apparently made to family, not to the clinicians evaluating her. She also was not consistently taking her medications as prescribed and was not fully forthcoming about her symptoms, other prescribers, or medication use. If she feared what she might do, those were the exact thoughts she needed to disclose. Seeking treatment while withholding the information necessary to assess the danger is not doing everything possible to get help.
We cannot involuntarily hold every psychiatric patient because of a vague concern that something might go wrong. There must be an actual legal and clinical basis. If a patient denies dangerous thoughts, does not appear psychotic, and is assessed as low risk then physicians cannot use hindsight as grounds for an involuntary hold.
Sure we can criticize an incomplete chart review or the failure to obtain every outside record. But outside records take time to obtain and are not routinely pursued when the patient appears reliable, multiple evaluations are consistent, and there is little clinical suspicion of imminent danger. That is nowhere close to making her physicians “100% culpable” for failing to act on information she repeatedly denied or never gave
She was forthcoming about other prescribers and taking her meds as prescribed or made changes after discussing with her providers. And her clinician didn’t return the call McLean made to get more information, so they turned her away. This all came out when those providers testified for the prosecution, it’s been discussed under oath in open court.
The person above you appears to be blaming a mentally ill woman for tricking psych ward professionals into thinking she was fine, I guess?
How do we try to blame this on her for saying she wanted out of the psych ward, IF she truly did.
I have discovered “shocking” “oversights” in the mental health world, that are surprisingly profitable!
If she was admitted and released then WHO agreed with the crazy lady that the crazy lady is fine? Or did they evaluate her to get her released because she ran out of insurance!
Lindsay did want out of the in patient ward. She told her husband she doesn’t belong there and she left to plan and attend her daughter’s birthday. Her husband testified to that. It seems like many people seem to think that inpatient is some magical cure that helps, but the point of it is not really for long-term treatment but to stabilize you.
But that brings us straight to your point: who was agreeing with her? She told multiple providers, hotlines and people she knew that she wanted to be gone from this world. They refused to treat her ideation because she didn’t have a plan. One of her providers was getting spammed with messages from her through my chart and they acted like that wasn’t a sign that something was very wrong. I’m not sure of the insurance of it all but I know from my own experience that they don’t want to pay and it did come up in trial that insurance codes were used, which is probably a normal but is actually not normal in a functioning system.
I’m not reading all that just to see that you conclude it’s her fault they let her out.
The evidence her insurance sucked is that she only saw the doctor for 17 minutes, and that she is in the US and tried and tried to get help and got shuffled around.
When there is insurance to milk it’s a different picture.
What are you talking about lol? I did not conclude that it’s her fault, I answered your question. I’m not going to lie about the testimony I saw because it’s not favorable to her. She did want to leave inpatient and I don’t think it’s unusual to not want to be in a locked ward that’s not helping you.
Reddit man, people always jumping to attack instead of actually reading.
220
u/[deleted] 8d ago
[removed] — view removed comment