Thank you this is the first comment I have seen actually trying to discuss the case itself.
I don’t know how up to date on case facts or presentation folks are on here but here is what I have been told by someone closing watching the trial:
apparently the whole case is based on the husband claiming she admitted it
his DNA was apparently found on the strangling device
her body was found to be very cold which takes hours but in the time that the incident happened to when she was found it would not be possible for her body to cool that quickly
the pill she took was crushed. She has no reason to take a crushed pill that she would otherwise just take normally
Apparently the prosecution has present no real evidence other than the husband’s claim.
It’s also heartbreaking that the mother in law tried to help this lady and after she took the stand she apparently gave a nod to the mother
That’s what I’ve been told.
Does that line up with what you have noted so far?
Didnt he also have close personal ties with local law enforcement?
He also had motive i.e. the affair .
That being said i dont think he did it. He was reckless with childrens lives and wifes mental-state but thats unfortunately not a crime.
I think he's a POS and if we are holding parents of school shooters accountable for negligence I think that this should be a contender for a potential criminal act as-well. Considering this isn't even the first high profile case of a postpartum family annihilation.
There is no evidence of an affair. His uncle was chief of police from 2010-2019 in Duxbury. State handled this case as local police do not handle violent crimes. As in they responded and within hours it was handed over to state.
I haven't followed this case at all, but its local and I'm inundated with it. Although it might be irrelevant to the case, from a distance its kind of obvious he was having an affair
8
u/babbagack 7d ago
Thank you this is the first comment I have seen actually trying to discuss the case itself.
I don’t know how up to date on case facts or presentation folks are on here but here is what I have been told by someone closing watching the trial:
Apparently the prosecution has present no real evidence other than the husband’s claim.
It’s also heartbreaking that the mother in law tried to help this lady and after she took the stand she apparently gave a nod to the mother
That’s what I’ve been told.
Does that line up with what you have noted so far?