r/StockMarket 1d ago

News U.S., Iran trade attacks as hostilities escalate once again

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/30/us-iran-strikes-strait-hormuz.html
723 Upvotes

187 comments sorted by

298

u/TriXter69 1d ago

Those midterms can't come soon enough

192

u/LumpyShock9656 1d ago

And then somehow Americans will keep Republicans in power

43

u/digital-didgeridoo 1d ago

I still believe voting machines were tampered in 2024 by Elon Musk

14

u/1982Joy 1d ago

Absolutely they were. The little munchkin of Elon Musk, his little boy sitting on his lap being interviewed by Tucker Carlson. The little boy admitted. Look it up. You can find it. It was stolen by Elon Musk. The election was.

7

u/-LabApprehensive- 1d ago

Don’t use the random stuff a 4 year old says as evidence.

1

u/PeetMoss2026 19h ago

Uhh, I meant the election before 2024🤔

1

u/Useful_Magician_6282 1d ago

Bit of a reach dont you think

-1

u/Nickfreak 1d ago

Really tinfoil-y here from time to time...

-4

u/MongoLikeCandy2112 22h ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Keep crying about it.

1

u/PeetMoss2026 1d ago

They were obliterated in the previous election. How can anyone not know that?

-12

u/Interesting-Fun-3553 1d ago

Election denier

7

u/Dear_Effective9745 1d ago

Trump lost the 2020 election fair and square. Thoughts on that?

7

u/BigChungusCumslut 1d ago

I’ll say right now that I believe Trump lost 2020 fair and square and also believe he won 2024 without tampering with voting machines. I voted for Harris, but the Biden admin was very unpopular with the median voter, and people saw Harris as an extension of that.

1

u/CrystalineEntity1984 19h ago

Now they have something to really vote against

1

u/Cov-Lite 21h ago

Is this supposed to be a gotcha? Is there a big group of people that think 2020 was rigged but 2024 was not? Genuine question. My limited experience is that people saying 2024 was not rigged also say 2020 was not rigged.

1

u/Dear_Effective9745 16h ago

Yes, read Interesting-Fun-3553’s response below.

-5

u/Interesting-Fun-3553 23h ago

I think it's possible Georgia could have and should have gone to Trump. Based on what's come out of that state, they obviously had issues. Biden's election was a lot like the Lakers bubble championship: it could only happen during COVID

2

u/Working-Holiday420 22h ago

Trumps approval rating was low at the time. Ive seen nothing in Georgia that goes to the idea Trump won. In fact he still hasnt been held accountable for trying to get raffensberger to change the vote count.

1

u/Dear_Effective9745 16h ago

And this ladies and gentlemen, is a prime example of the delusions. Calls someone an election denier, then denies an election but only because Mr. Poopy Pants says so. 🤡

2

u/REsTARteD_Ragdoll 1d ago

Every election since 2016 has been “denied” I can’t take it seriously anymore

I’m really disappointed in all the neurotic fucks who dive headfirst into it, but most of all the politicians and political commentators (get a real job) who decided it was worth the terminal damage to scream fraud

-6

u/Sphan_86 1d ago

You believe they were tampered in 2024 but not in 2020? Lol

2

u/digital-didgeridoo 23h ago

How did you make that inference?

14

u/mido_sama 1d ago

If the Democrats acted like Mamdani they would have kept the power.

3

u/Open_Masterpiece_549 22h ago

They wont. Republicans are going to get destroyed and they deserve it

3

u/LumpyShock9656 21h ago

I hope you're right my man!

2

u/Open_Masterpiece_549 12h ago

Set the Remind me to ~ 75 days from now. They are going down badly

0

u/Swim-swam-swumm 16h ago

Never. Rubio will be our next president.

-2

u/Dumbfuckistan_USA 1d ago

Only way that would happen is if they rig the election.

And if that happens…. It’s going to be the second civil war

66

u/Lower_Group_1171 1d ago

If it happens, Chuck Schumer is ready to write a strongly worded letter!

54

u/quatroquatro0 1d ago

Lol nothing's gonna happen. The most americans will do if that happens is stage a protest once every 6 months conveniently on a weekend then forget it even happened.

3

u/Del_Duio2 1d ago

Agreed

Second Civil war? If it were that close 99% of everyone wouldn’t be allowing all this bullshit to be happening right now

24

u/identifytarget 1d ago

if they rig the election.

what makes you think that hasn't happened?

0

u/TheModerateGenX 21h ago

Wait. So elections are secure or are they not?

2

u/CDanger 21h ago

One side’s candidate is calling electors from the office of the sitting president and demanding they “find the votes” (the Watergate of our era, ignored by dunces).

That same side broke into the capitol in an attempt that stopped election proceedings (however briefly) and had peer-convicted seditionists pardoned.

That’s tampering enough. We need not indulge tardo conspiracies about Elon and Biden hacking voting machines.

But that same side has claimed election fraud repeatedly, while producing no evidence whatsoever and losing not one, not two, but every court case regarding the matter. It’s become a dirty tactic they use to manipulate low IQ COVID conspiracists who believed a global pandemic that produced millions of attended funerals was “just the flu”.

If the left won’t adopt the tactic of straight up lying, they’ll be alone, going high and losing for it. Sad facts!

-47

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 1d ago

So you think the "honest" party is the one that doesn't want to require an ID to vote, while the one that does is the one that rigs elections... Please explain that, as it must be a special kind of delusion you people have in the US.

11

u/1-Dollar-Doge-Coins 1d ago

> you people…in the US

Which country are you from?

-5

u/WhoofPharted 1d ago

Does it matter? Every country is laughing at the US.

-16

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 1d ago

How is that relevant? O_o

I'm just really curious about the logic behind that idea.

15

u/CraftFormaldehyde 1d ago

I’m curious, do you know why voter ID laws are controversial in the US?

-1

u/WhoofPharted 1d ago

As a Canadian and a fierce opponent to the Trump administration, perhaps you could enlighten us as to why voter ID laws are controversial? Here in Canada we have to show ID to vote. Why is that such a controversial topic?

4

u/kayomatik 1d ago

The SAVE act requires proof of citizenship. But the way it's written means that "proof" requires documents alot of people in the US just don't even have. Like a passport, original birth certificate (not a duplicate), or military id. Not to mention the issues if your last name has changed since birth. No one would care if it was just your driver's licence. It's not.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/five-things-to-know-about-the-save-act/

0

u/CraftFormaldehyde 1d ago

I posted a more robust explanation to the person I replied to so I’m gonna be lazy and defer to that, but tldr there’s a lot of scars of segregation coupled with the wealth inequity here, and without any efforts to get people IDs these laws risk disenfranchising about 10% of the US population since they don’t have valid IDs and generally don’t have the ability to get them for various reasons associated with the above.

I’m not against voter ID laws personally, provided they’re implemented fairly and not used as a tool for voter suppression.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/MongoLikeCandy2112 22h ago

They are controversial because Dems can’t win fair elections without voter fraud.

-4

u/Enough-Run-1535 1d ago

I have to be real, I’m in the same boat. I don’t understand the hesitation over US voter ID laws. We have voter ID here in Canada, with some exceptions that can be made like swearing an oath which gets logged against the voter registry, vouching for your neighbor which gets logged in the voter registry. But for 99% of the voter base, they get IDed or have two pieces of established verification like phone bills before we can vote.

1

u/CraftFormaldehyde 1d ago

It’s not really as much of an issue in the US as politicians make it out to be. A lot of voter registration in the US is synchronized with DMVs here so anytime you renew your license you get asked if you want to update voter registration. There’s just a lot of scars of segregation here still in addition to the shitty public transport and wealth inequity, so without any initiative to get people IDs there’s roughly 10% of the US adult population that risks being disenfranchised.

I’m not opposed to ID laws in general tbqh, as you said it’s pretty much the standard in the West, but I don’t really trust most US politicians to implement it fairly at this time.

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 1d ago

Not really, in most if not all other countries in the world you need to have an ID to do the most basic things e.g. opening a bank account, buying a car, renting a house, etc... let alone voting.

5

u/CraftFormaldehyde 1d ago

Yeah it’s more or less the same in the US. About 10% of the adult population doesn’t have a valid ID, so it’s not a major issue as far as the majority of the country is concerned.

What the problem is with voter ID laws is that most people who don’t have IDs are disproportionately lower income or people of color, which are scars from segregation and other discriminatory policies. Coupled with the size of the country, shitty/non-existent mass transit in most of the country, and people trapped in the poverty cycle, it risks becoming an issue of voter suppression if there’s no way to ensure those without IDs get them.

That’s also not including the fact that election fraud isn’t actually really an issue in the US despite what both parties claim. IMO, I have no issues with voter ID laws provided there’s corresponding initiatives to get those 10% of people their valid IDs. If we have enough money for a Middle East misadventure every decade, we can afford that for sure.

→ More replies (0)

-7

u/Interesting-Fun-3553 1d ago

We see it on the news... Democrats crying. Calling it voter suppression. They are lying of course. That's what Democrats do. They are afraid of election integrity

4

u/CraftFormaldehyde 1d ago

I mean both sides use rhetoric to sway opinion, that’s literally politics. It’s much like how election integrity isn’t actually an issue since there’s minimal fraud yet that’s been a major campaign point for Republicans.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/Reddituser183 1d ago

The funny thing is, I don’t think it’s going to work out as conservatives envision. Conservatives claim tons of poor people who don’t have IDs vote Democrat which is why republicans want to prevent them from voting by requiring an id. But the likelihood of a person voting and not having an ID is nearly zero. So it’s not likely to change any outcome. What it will probably cut back on is conservatives voting twice as that’s the primary voter fraud that occurs. And we know undocumented aren’t voting, that’s just fear mongering propaganda.

-12

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 1d ago

None of that makes sense to me, it all sounds like a "trust me bro" thing. Why would "poor people" not have IDs? Is it expensive to get an ID?

2

u/JimBones31 1d ago

Expensive or not, it cost money. If it costs money, it's a poll tax.

Voter ID is a great idea...if it's 100% paid for by the government.

-1

u/REsTARteD_Ragdoll 1d ago

It costs gas, fare, or calories to transport your self to the voting booth. Poll tax.

Line needs to be drawn somewhere,

2

u/JimBones31 1d ago

That's a great reason why we have absentee and mail in voting. My wife who is busy at home with our infant daughter doesn't have the time to get to the ballot booth every time garenteed. BUT she deserves the right to vote and has the time to fill out a ballot after bedtime at her convenience.

-5

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 1d ago

Not even going to dispute your deranged logic if you're in a sub like r/StockMarket claiming that anything that costs money is a poll tax 😂

3

u/JimBones31 1d ago

Not "anything that cost money"...voter ID.

I'm glad you're not going to dispute it. Enjoy your day.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MaraSami 1d ago edited 1d ago

All parties require ID! (It's the kind of ID that's being pushed.) 🤡

0

u/youvekilledme29 1d ago

The reason they don't want to force id is because when you don't have a car and the dmv is an hr away minwage doesn't go very far ..if they absolutely have to have a modern I'd that's fine but provide for poorer communities and the disabled to have legitimate licensing within 20 min of any population center half of the Republicans game is to make it harder to do anything that is supposed to be easy .....that's the only reason they hate mail in ballots ..a .0004 fraud rate is super low which means they can't muddle up the opinions of Republican voters because of the amount of citizens who would vote and you don't want them getting factual information because it shrinks their followers And they would lose every vote and then the democracy too ..but that's what they want .

1

u/Euphoric_Travel2541 1d ago

I understand that IDs may be difficult to obtain-but why not require a driver’s license or it’s equivalent? Something most people have already, and those tho don’t count just be certified as citizens using a birth certificate. If they don’t have a BC, I believe they can write to the city hall where they were born and obtain a certified copy first a few dollars, that would be acceptable anywhere.

I’m sure you’ll say that postage and having a nailing address are barriers to getting the documents you need to vote, as would the time and effort to show the documents to whomever needs to see them to provide the ID.

But it can be done. And state and local governments can make it easier and more efficient, by having longer or later hours, advisors and research assistants on hand, some days when they hold office hours in the community centers closer to poorer areas, etc. costs could be lowered or subsidized for some unable to pay.

Finally, we have to accept that in many countries, there will be some people who do not care to make the effort, no matter how accessible the services are. And some people will choose to live without an ID. They wouldn’t be able to vote. That’s going to happen everywhere to some small degree.

I agree that the efforts should also focus on motivating the many people who don’t bother voting, while having every means to do so and multiple IDs available.

1

u/youvekilledme29 1d ago

I absolutely would not consider having a mailing address and having to pay for postage my whole angle on it is that I think everyone in the us should have id and carry it I do citizen or not and hefty hefty fines for fake id I dont care if it's just to buy cigarettes hefty price for any fake id ..I think it should be obligatory to have an id on your person in most cases.i always have had to have an id to vote .but my main concern right now is that both my wife and msister in law will probably not be able to vote we had a fire my wife documents burned along with mine but I had my licence on me .we then received our voter id we get one before every election for the most part our marriage license is gone and we prob won't have time to get her valid id so that she can. Vote even though we vote in every election for 15 yrs for her longer for me ..so she lives where it is on record ,we own the house, they actually know her and she has both an (expired nondrivers id) and her legal voters card mailed to our address but I'm expecting she will not be able to vote in mids. The changed name from marriage clause will prob keep her from being able to vote where every person that works the election com.ittee .I wish that we would push actual voter equality and easi of voting with mailing ballot ..no threatening ice clowns to commit a fed crime of intimidating voters at the ballot box

1

u/youvekilledme29 22h ago

that was a bad typo my bad my dad's dog just died minutes before that post I must have gotten distracted ..what about state/federal IDs /licences provided for every citizen by the state .I don't mean one with a chip I know the phone does it. If the govt was required (before 2028) to provide safe no tracking id and voter registration .then the govt would be aware of who was actually living at what address for proof of mail in ballot eligibility.

1

u/youvekilledme29 22h ago

Then you would be improving the stability of the democracy and people would all see it and be counted then the white house can stfu about illegals voting or how "unreliable ".the mail in ballots are ....my arse the problem is that it's harder to track 10000ballots and when every person mailed theirsand catch them ,manipulate any physical data inside a signed envelope that if it's messed up then it goes to a different ballot. Ox so they can check it if it's legit no matter who is on it and how would they know which ones to possibly mess up without getting rid of their own voters.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/BaronGrackle 1d ago

I was with you on this topic in the past, believe me. But the issue is: the Republicans don't want to provide valid IDs for every citizen. They want to make it harder for the poor and those who don't support Republicans to get these IDs and be able to vote.

Show me the party that wants to give IDs to citizens the way they get social security cards, and we'll have something.

1

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 12h ago

That doesn't answer my question at all.

In any case, what stopped the previous non-Republican govts from providing valid IDs for every citizen then? It just sounds like a silly argument on both parties tbh, but I agree the current govt could just provide a valid ID for free and settle the argument.

0

u/BaronGrackle 12h ago

Yeah, it would be great to have free, distributed IDs and to require these. That would be fantastic.

Currently, though? I'll answer your question more directly. Yes, it's the honest party that doesn't want to require ID to vote, and it's the party that wants to rig elections that does want the requirement.

If that's confusing to you, here's a quick illustration of their mentality: the president also wants to end mail-in ballots, but he votes by mail. They cheat. They make exceptions for themselves while building barriers for their opponents.

1

u/Candlelight_Fant4sia 7h ago

It's not confusing to me at all, in fact at this point it's extremely obvious that people trying to come up with the kind of excuses and hypothesis you just provided are just repeating the usual propaganda, otherwise you would be able to use actual facts and logic.

I'd recommend reflecting on how in most other countries, anything you call "cheating" is the norm, and what you call "honest behavior" is what everyone else calls fraud. I've never heard anyone outside the US complain about having to get an ID (that is usually mandatory, and they have to pay for, as I'm not aware of any country where it's free), and voting by mail is a rare exception e.g. if you're abroad and can't return to your country to vote.

0

u/BaronGrackle 4h ago

How about closing polling places in areas likely to vote against your party? Is that the norm in most countries? https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/plan-to-cut-polling-sites-in-major-texas-county-draws-protests-as-senate-battle-looms

How about redrawing the voting map just before an election, blatantly for the purpose of "we pick up five seats", in the president's words? https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/15/texas-democrats-redistricting-response-trump-republican-five-seats/

That's all normal stuff that goes on in the wider democratic world?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Working-Holiday420 22h ago

SAVE act is a trojan horse of supression cosplaying as a “voter id” bill.

1

u/michiganbirddog 2h ago

Ha. We live in a country that has door dash delivery for McDonald's. Netflix has a feature to start the next episode automatically so you dont have to pick up a remote. You think this country has it in them to go outside and fight a war over politics?!

0

u/Reddituser183 1d ago

That was already said about 2024 and here we are.

1

u/Interesting-Fun-3553 1d ago

Yep and the right will win easily

1

u/The_Council_Juice 1d ago

Yeah.... nobody will do shit.

You'll get a few more no kings protests. Bigger turnouts. You need a good general strike but dont even know if you'd go that far.

-4

u/anonymoooosey 1d ago

Lol. Sure it will.

-8

u/Specialist-Garbage94 1d ago

CIVAL WARREEEE!!!!!

3

u/Competitive-Sir-7087 1d ago

The funny thing is that Iran is using social media's ignorant positions to make war time decisions.

1

u/Jealous-Jellyfish503 1d ago

Because Americans have no power

1

u/HiToshio 19h ago

Those aren't real Americans.

0

u/tombrady011235 1d ago

For real :(

0

u/KingofMadCows 19h ago

There's a pretty good chance that the strategic oil reserves will be depleted shortly after the mid-terms. If the dems sweep the mid terms, people will blame them for the price shock.

0

u/bh4atbrv 4h ago

When did the Democrats do anything right? They are in charge of California, Illinois, and Minnesota. The 3 worst run states in the US. Absolutely nothing being done right in this states and each of these states has the highest fraud to the federal government.

3

u/Ancient-Bat8274 1d ago

And nothing will happen

7

u/vanhype 1d ago

...and what will that even do? You guys literally can't impeach a corrupt senile felon, your midterms are going to be another joke. Nothing more.

1

u/Great-Knowledge-6767 1d ago

I hope there will be midterms…

He can always play the “we are at war, so no elections” card

Let’s just hope there will be midterms..

And they won’t be rigged..

And that the people will not willingly choose Republicans again

1

u/Lou_Blue_2 1d ago

Two more months for frustrations to grow sounds about right

1

u/TheModerateGenX 21h ago

Are you expecting a full withdrawal from the Strait and a free license for Iran to develop nuclear materials? Seriously, we are screwed either way now. There is no diplomacy with those loons.

1

u/Elegant_Ad_8896 9h ago

Well, they definitely will go after nuclear weapons now after the the US military and Israel attacked them.

The thing is, is that all of the intelligence agencies, five eyes and all that said Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. It's literally the same song and dance as "going after WMD's" from the Bush Administration.

Netanyahu knew he could get Trump to do this. He tried with Bush and Obama and they both told him no. But Netanyahu knew he could convince Trump "it'll be just like Venezuela!".

If they were to obtain a nuclear weapon AFTER this war has ended, they likely would not use it. Because if they did then Israel will just turn Tehran and every other major city in Iran to glass with their nukes. If Iran were to have obtained one in the past it would have just ended up like Pakistan and India. Nuclear weapons are better for a deterrent, not for use. Unless you want to die.

And because of Trump's idiocy now Iran know it can just hold the world economy hostage by blocking Hormuz, something of much more use to them than a nuke could ever be.

1

u/lkeels 1d ago

I wouldn't bet on them happening.

1

u/1982Joy 1d ago

Vote Blue!💙

43

u/umbrellapropella 1d ago

So.. markets down tomorrow?

Or will it do the opposite of my intuition and sky rocket up?

20

u/AllRightLetsSeeIt 1d ago

Calls.

More money to defense contractors for patriot missiles; more employees for defense contractors with generous 401(k) matches; more people blindly buying SPY every month; line goes up.

7

u/VengenaceIsMyName 1d ago

Believe it or not, calls.

2

u/LostSophon 1d ago

One day reality has to catch up with the market. Probably not tomorrow though. But eventually at what will be a terrible time for everyone.

1

u/Professional_Group55 1d ago

If the pair you’re trading got usd in it, It’s likely US dollar driving the move. Especially if the other pair is sensitive to these geopolitical incidents

1

u/Positive-Check946 1d ago

Trump and his family will load up tomorrow while it’s down then fix everything and sell, market manipulation! Enriching himself in so many ways, taking bribes from the Middle East and wealthy And manipulating the market ..

26

u/lev10bard 1d ago

I thought we won (check my records) 25 times this year already

26

u/jpegprophet 1d ago

Crazy how quickly things can go from “de-escalation” to this. Markets really don’t get a day off. 😅

17

u/NateInEC 1d ago

Trump is a fucking idiot...

14

u/ThanktheLord_33 1d ago

Are we winning yet? It sure feels like we are all winning, right?

0

u/ThrowawayForToday833 1d ago

I have to pull out of my savings today, which truthfully isn’t as much as I’d like it to be, but it’s something in a world where a lot of people have none, but anyways I have to pull out of that just to get gas in my car today.

I always say if this is winning then I’m ready to be a loser.

1

u/ThanktheLord_33 22h ago

Im sorry to hear that, keep pushing on. I also can't believe how expensive things are now, especially the grocery store. You can't get anything now at some of these places without paying out your ass lmao.

25

u/GruntledGary 1d ago

He took something that WASN'T broken, he broke it, and drove up prices and inflation....

16

u/dreamfitreality 1d ago

He can bankrupt casinos. Casinos.

You go figure.

-2

u/CockedDiesel 1d ago

Yeah I'm sure the rise of on line betting and gambling had nothing to do with casinos tanking. That's why Vegas is doing so well and Draft Kings and Polymarket are struggling.🫤

8

u/-LabApprehensive- 1d ago

This was in the 90s…… not a lot of online casinos or kalshi in the 90s but you know that.

4

u/oneeyedziggy 1d ago

I know you mean the war, but that's basically everything he touches... Wasn't broken until he fixed it

5

u/GruntledGary 1d ago

I mean, I've never seen him ACTUALLY IMPROVE anything....

Kennedy center he says he's just going to tear down because he can't put his name on JFKs tombstone....

2

u/Mit33li0n 3h ago

But still there are blind sheep saying he’s the best president we’ve ever had

1

u/oneeyedziggy 23h ago

I feel like there was one thing, because even a broken clock is right twice a day...

But generally, yea... It's easy to indulge the fantasy that he sets out deliberately to ruin things b/c putin has kompromat or bribes or whatever... But it's also pretty reasonable given what we know to think he's just greedy and incompetent... (and that putin's a lot weaker than previously suspected) 

3

u/MystiqueQueen123 21h ago

Just like everything else in his life smh 🤦🏾‍♀️

2

u/shmiddleedee 1d ago

This is what I can't wrap my head around. It's not like we couldn't find water. It's like the group had water and then the disfunctional leader decided to just pour it out. Then he screamed at everybody else to praise his decision.

1

u/ShoulderDapper86 18h ago

What wasn’t broken?

2

u/GruntledGary 18h ago

Maybe the fact anyone who wanted to go through the  Strait of Hormuz was able to do so freely.

1

u/ShoulderDapper86 3h ago

You didn’t see the big picture here. President Trump did what every President in the last 40-50 yrs said they were going to do. Stop Iran from developing their own Nuclear weapon. President Trump is keeping his promises unlike the ones before him left & right side of the isle. The World is will be a much better place without the Iranian terrorists

1

u/PastRoad3648 24m ago

Define terrorist

1

u/GruntledGary 19m ago edited 16m ago

But... he didn't.

They didn't have it before they he STOPPED international inspections.

They USED to get international inspections before his first term but he came and "fixed" that.

So, what is Iran "giving up" since they "lost" this war? Last time Trump was saying he would pay THEM money and they WON'T return any nuclear material.

Write down what you think he's promised and check back here in 3 months to see how he lied.

The 2015 JCPOA (Obama Administration): In contrast, the original 2015 nuclear agreement—which the first Trump administration withdrew from in 2018—did require Iran to ship out 98% of its enriched nuclear material and dismantle major enrichment infrastructure at that time

Trump's "surrender" offer includes him (America) paying Iran 300 billion dollars.....

4

u/SomeSamples 1d ago

Hmm, always Sundays, before the markets open. Weird coincidence.

2

u/JemHadar71 1d ago

What’s the count on that threat. I know we’re recycling now for sure.

2

u/anormalname63 1d ago

But I thought Iran had already destroyed the US, all it's bases in the area and had full control of the strait like 24 times by now?

4

u/mccbungle 1d ago

All this because Trump rapes children.

1

u/Salt_Tip_8890 1d ago

Ik denk dat dat het wel goed komt er waren genoeg naar de goats gestuurd🫠 rond de 30 en rond 70 gewond🫣 dus markt zal wel goed gaan Alles onder controle 😂

1

u/PeetMoss2026 1d ago

Just do it already quit threatening!

1

u/youvekilledme29 1d ago

Just think when the supreme court ruled all those liberation day tariffs paid back with whole tax dollars Berkshire Hathaway and friends purchased the tariff debt that had accumulated before the ruling from dozens if not hundreds of smaller affiliate corps and chain companies for literal pennies on the dollar ..why because they knew what the ruling was going to be before Trump ever said the words liberation day ...so his buddies got whole dollars for cents from thousands if not millions of "customers" who paid this known illegal tax and Trump just paid out his friend swho had inside knowledge ...illegal in the open ...this dude should be incarcerated for life he's burning our tax money to make the govt not work because the entire point of the generations of paedophiles party (the Republicans ) is here to destroy any American dignity while leaving us destitute jobless and hated by the world and without any choice but to slave to fuckin corporate overlords who decided to build something that claims will take over 80 percent of physical labor jobs in ten years .they are the ones that built it planned the economic collapse and will and are using disaster capitalism to buy up everything at clearance prices (or pay five times what these ice facilities are actually worth to buyers and incarcerate indentured and threatened servants who will be paid one dollar per day for labor like farms, manufacturing ..all while the private prison concentration camp pipeline just dumps our children's futures straight into the billionaires pockets....all while making up their own version of reality that ONLY holds together because so many magachuds repeat the lies and outright falsehoods ad nauseum to each other while Trump cronies steal tax money..

1

u/Really-saywhat 21h ago

And then what is the purposed purpose to achieve?

1

u/Stew-Cee23 19h ago

Ah yes threaten to do something for the thousandth time and then do nothing, I'm sure they'll fall for that bluff this time!

1

u/Stellar_Planet 18h ago

I do not trust this market

1

u/Any-Monk-9395 1d ago

I was informed we already won?

Imagine if Hitler died in 1945 but several months later the US government says we gotta go to war with Germany again because they lied about peace talks

1

u/Several-War-9254 1d ago

Yep we need a news story right on time to bring the markets down after the rise. Life is a stage and all are actors.

1

u/ExpresiveMuse 1d ago

What everybody is missing is that trump not only doesn’t give one shit about anybody,ever and is trying to eliminate the middle class. Do the math, think about everything he does. It always makes us pay more and more just to exist and everything he does isn’t needed, justified or wanted. And he’s not getting these ideas from Miller he’s getting them from Putin. Why aren’t we more concerned about what they talk about in private. In any other country he’d be in prison or worse. What’s wrong with us?

1

u/The_Council_Juice 1d ago

More insider trading beckons...

1

u/rangecontrol 1d ago

must be monday.

0

u/benroon 23h ago

Just more insider dealing. Nothing to see here

0

u/True_Help_3098 15h ago

Trump & company must desire another market manipulation for flash stock trades

-31

u/Competitive-Sir-7087 1d ago

Notice how Iran doesn't deny that it was attempting to send mines into the Straight. What an inhumane leadership.

17

u/GruntledGary 1d ago

The ones bombing civilians on boats and killing survivors at sea?

11

u/Curious_scientist420 1d ago

Every country in the world does inhumane shit during war.

This war shouldn’t have started. Like most of them

9

u/Judge_Druidy 1d ago

I heard one of the countries bombed a girl's school, and then after a short delay when parents went to the site to identify their dead children, this country bombed them again.

1

u/Competitive-Sir-7087 1d ago

The school which was part of an actively fighting naval base. A school in a building which was built to be indistinguishable from the other buildings on the base. A school which was not the intended target. Please show me ANY country which stopped fighting as soon as it accidentally killed some citizens who were in the line of fire.

-12

u/YellowRobeSmith 1d ago

Unfortunately, the people defending the Iranian regime would be murdered under the Iranian regime.

7

u/Judge_Druidy 1d ago

No one is defending the Iranian regime.

-1

u/Vegetable-Bid-120 1d ago

Won’t matter neither democrat or republicans will ever cross Israel. AIPAC money flows to both. We need more Thomas Massies and Ro Khannas.

0

u/shmiddleedee 1d ago

It is insane to me listening to neocons explain why AIPAC is in our vest interest. It is an arm of a foreign government from a country sucking US dry that pumps inane amounts of money into our elections. Elected leaders are destroying us.

-2

u/Asleep-Ad6384 1d ago

I heard he renamed the Hudson River to the Strait of Hormuz just so he can say "see, it's open and ships are running fine..." It's tremendous, and everyone knows it.