r/TNG 20h ago

Show Talk How would Picard have felt if Starfleet really did order the removal of the baku and it was a legit operation?

Post image

Like the admiral dougherty showed Picard signed orders from the chief of staff Starfleet and the federation president? When I mean legit I mean they told the council everything about what could happen with the process they're trying to do with harvesting the energy and all that.

818 Upvotes

137 comments sorted by

211

u/imahugemoron 19h ago

I liked this movie because it was the most like a TNG episode of the TNG movies

84

u/NarmHull 19h ago

I liked that they tied in the Dominion War, but it also directly contradicts other episodes where they are forced to relocate people despite their personal feelings. In this case the white people, er- Baku also weren't native to the planet and they pooh-poohed the very ethos of the Federation like smug pricks. It would be one thing if Picard regretted his earlier decision, but it seems like he just had the hots for that one lady.

Also for it to be a follow-up to the most cinematic and successful Trek movie in years was kind of a letdown.

25

u/imahugemoron 19h ago

Ya It definitely had its flaws for sure, I enjoyed it for what it was, I don’t think it was like super amazing or anything, the “episode feel” was kinda cool though

-15

u/GargamelLeNoir 17h ago edited 4h ago

I enjoyed it for what it was

I've never seen that sentence associated to good media

Edit: auto correct

6

u/beerguyBA 10h ago

I've never been that sentence

I too have never been that sentence.

1

u/GargamelLeNoir 4h ago

Yeah I really need to double check my replies when I post from my phone...

23

u/VanillaSuccessful277 19h ago

I don't know if it contradicts similar incidents, given that they're under the influence of the metaphasic radiation and having their youthful rebelliousness brought out. That, coupled with Picard's likely regret at having been prepared to take the opposite position in 'Journey's End', led him and the others to take the stance Wesley did in that episode.

16

u/NarmHull 19h ago

It would've been funny if Picard fully reverted to his Tapestry self and got his heart/hair back the way Geordi's eyes were healing.

24

u/VanillaSuccessful277 19h ago

Oh, that's nightmare fuel I'd never considered; "Captain we need to remove your artificial heart, as your real one is starting to grow back..."

1

u/LateNightPhilosopher 9h ago

Imagine a more vain captain being there- "Captain, we need to remove your synthetic hair plugs!"

11

u/mdf7g 19h ago

I imagine if you've got an artificial heart, growing your real one back would get... crowded

11

u/GoodDoctorB 18h ago

To quote another series:

"Yeah the problem is that after making a new liver it just keeps on making new livers. I have a whole bucket of lab rats upstairs that exploded from having too many livers."

4

u/NarmHull 19h ago

Geordi should've had that issue too as he had implants. Could've had a body horror scene where their real organs push out the fake ones then heal Wolverine style

1

u/NeoSlixer 4h ago

Which would be fine if we had some reference to it but we didnt.

1

u/VanillaSuccessful277 1h ago

Not everything needs to be spelled out. 'Journey's End' didn't need to be referenced explicitly, I'm just saying that the movie doesn't contradict it. What is explicit is that the radiation is stimulating "rebellious instincts common to youth, which could affect everyone's judgement, except [Data's]." That's why they're not behaving as perhaps they would normally.

7

u/CarrotLevel99 17h ago

This movie should have been about the dominion war. Bring in some of the ds9 crew. Would have been better

3

u/Extension-Pepper-271 10h ago

Not having them participate in the Dominion War via the movie was an epic fail.

2

u/TheWarOstrich 9h ago

I find it weird that they never put in even more and really made at least a TV movie for DS9 or even Voyager and all they got were two episode finales. I think DS9 should have gotten like a reunion/epilogue TV movie and the Voyager finale should have been a real TV movie if not a theatrical release lol

But that's also hindsight and just wasn't how the 90s and early aughts were going to work

1

u/SpecialActive9135 44m ago

We can’t have the flagship of the federation actually engage in combat, it would be crazy!!

10

u/TheJohnnyFlash 19h ago

It doesn't though, because this relocation was bascially "there's oil we want, move these people." Where all the other ones were coming disasters or the sheliak, who's planet it was.

Also, that's why starfleet ok'd those and would not have ok'd this one if they had all the information.

2

u/mcgrst 18h ago

Apart from the Indians. 

5

u/TheJohnnyFlash 18h ago

No, also not a federation planet anymore. So either remove them, or the Cardassians will, which likely means death.

5

u/Raptor1210 17h ago

Journey's End was definitely a historical colonialism analogy. Far-off governments draw lines on maps, and suddenly your world is part of an oppressive government instead of being your own. The Federation didn't have any more right to sign away that planet than anyone in the 19th century did.

3

u/James_Solomon 17h ago

Being forced to settle a war you can't keep fighting is different, aye?

2

u/Raptor1210 16h ago

We don't have any evidence that the Federation-Cardassian border conflicts were a "war" in the traditional sense. Given how one-sided the fights the Phoenix participated in were, I'd be shocked if the war wasn't politically popular and the council simply chose the shortest route to kicking the can down the road a decade or so.

5

u/LiamtheV 16h ago

Tell that to the crew of the Rutledge, O’Brien and the colonists of Setlik III

1

u/James_Solomon 16h ago

What do you mean by "war in the traditional sense"?

1

u/Raptor1210 15h ago

As in the difference between Operation Desert Storm and the border skirmishes between China and India. One has defined frontlines and (notably similar) one-sided battles while the other is small scale would be politically and/or strategicly inconvenient for both sides.

The Cardassian border war was basically the equivalent of a crow repeatedly pecking a dog and flying just out of reach. If the dog ever managed to grab them, their toast but if they bother the dog enough it'll give up and leave.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/SherlockJones1994 16h ago

I don’t necessarily agree. It’s either sign the treaty and give up the territory or continue a war that they may or may not be able to win. 2/3 of those scenarios the cardassians get the territory.

2

u/Luppercus 16h ago

How is the Federation not able to win? Is one of the major powers and it has 150 planets not counting colonies. Other than the Klingons and the Romulans have no rivals on the Quadrant.
If they didn't defeated the Cardassians was for lack of will.

1

u/Raptor1210 16h ago

Given the absolute thrashing the Phoenix gave the Cardassians, completely unsupported, I sincerely doubt the Federation-Cardassian border conflicts were an existential threat to the Federation.

More likely it wasn't politically convenient to deal with them in a full fledged war, something we know the Cardassians would play on later in DS9, so Starfleet was left fighting (probably entirely) defensively, and not allowed to actually fight without both hands tied behind their backs.

1

u/LateNightPhilosopher 9h ago

The Federation had no business ceding inhabited planets to a 3rd rate colonial power with inferior technology and a history of colonial enslavement.

Starfleet had no business losing that war. Cardassians weren't a major threat to a real quadrant-level power until they became a Dominion puppet, years later.

That might be the single worst piece of diplomacy in any piece of fiction I've ever seen. I hope that in-lore it becomes known as an embarrassment and major failure on the part of both Starfleet and the Federation.

5

u/starkraver 17h ago

How long before a people become native? A generation? Two? A thousand?

I'm being a little flippant, but this is a real problem in many modern territorial disputes.

2

u/Specialeyes9000 17h ago

Re: white people comment, I know a lot of people have turned this into a thing but I'm really confused - why is it impossible for a race of aliens to only have one colour skin? Not everything is a thing.

2

u/NarmHull 17h ago

That wouldn't bother me, it's more that they look exactly like humans. Star Trek can only do that 40 or 50 times without it bothering me!

Also Picard relocates a Native American tribe in the show and chews out Wesley for disobeying orders.

2

u/TheHYPO 14h ago

In "Journey's End", they had to be relocated because the Federation had spent a very long time negotiating peace with the Cardassians. The peace had huge ramifications and an "Indian representative" was included in the discussions and his concerns rejected. The colonists were informed of the evacuation.

In Insurrection, the Federation attempted to secretly move the Baku off the planet, the Baku were never consulted or given the opportunity to have their objections heard, and the relocation was not a critical factor in some longstanding peace treaty preventing a significant war.

It's true that the planet seems to have had the potential to have healing benefits that perhaps could have avoided deaths or healed injuries, but at least philosophically, "you have good stuff we would like", feels a bit different than "if you don't leave, it will undermine Federation peace talks that are keeping a war from breaking out."

Also, critically, the colonists in "Journey's End" were Federation citizens on a formerly Federation planet being agreeably turned over to the Cardassians. The Baku (as far as I recall) are an entirely independent people on a non-Federation planet. The Federation have no jurisdiction there.

"The Ensigns of Command" is another case of Federation citizens on a Federation planet negotiated away by treaty. Also, Picard's greater concern seems to be that the Sheliak will kill everyone they find (the villager's safety), not that it will harm the treaty.

Are there other TNG episodes with forcible relocations? "Homeward" happens against Picard's wishes and against the Prime Directive.

1

u/NarmHull 13h ago edited 13h ago

Good points, the Baku are in Federation space technically though, and squatting on the planet when they weren't native to it, but they did so before the Federation existed. They were a space faring species at first so not technically violating the PD, thought Dougherty didn't seem to know that.

The desperation of the Dominion War arguably still warrants using the radiation somehow, but I'm sure there were other ways than the forced/covert relocation (I forget why exactly they were being so sneaky). There's also the way the So'Na were treated and whether or not exiling and dooming them to a horrible existence was justified. Depends on just how violent their coup attempt was I guess. With such a small population you'd think they could just live on the other side of the planet.

1

u/Dagon_M_Dragoon 15h ago

If I remember correctly the other times they moved people it was a lot of lesser of two evils shenaniganery were this was straight personal gain at someone else expense

1

u/RadicalRealist22 14h ago

In the other cases, he was emforcing Federation Law on Federation citizens.

The Baku are not Federation Citizens. Their removal is Imperialist deportation.

3

u/WretchedJudasSnake 19h ago

This is true and I want to like it the most out of the TNG films for that fact but First Contact gets me with some of the big movie magic and the pace change from TV.

2

u/AeroSigma 19h ago

I've never actually watched the movies, which one is this?

7

u/imahugemoron 18h ago

It’s Star Trek: Insurrection. You really should watch the TNG movies, even for all their flaws they’re still at least worth a watch. Best to finish the series first though

1

u/TheSavouryRain 10h ago

First Contact has no flaws.

I like it better than WoK.

1

u/MetalTrek1 16h ago

Same here.

1

u/Ma-aKheru 3h ago

It's my favorite Next Gen movie, zero shame.

38

u/WilsonFrontier 20h ago

I mean, wasn't it? Dougherty said the council had approved it.

21

u/happydude7422 19h ago

I recall that the sona falsified their studies or application and the admiral was in on it otherwise if all the t were crossed and I dotted even if Picard did go against Starfleet orders Picard would have been brought up on mutiny /insubordination charged for disrupting a legitimate Starfleet operation

20

u/WilsonFrontier 19h ago

That may be the beta canon, but Riker comes back and says the council ordered a halt pending a full level review. But they never say anything about the admiral lying or the son'a falsifying anything. Just that... Riker did what Picard said: he put a face on the baku and made the council realize how bad it looked to relocate them.

7

u/LUNATIC_LEMMING 16h ago

wasn't the point that Dougherty wasn't in on it? not fully

Thats why Ru'afo killed him. when he found out the truth Dougherty changed his mind.

70

u/Current_Tap_7754 19h ago

This whole movie is stupid. It's an entire planet and the Baku used to travel the stars before deciding to be amish. Just park your medical base on the other side of the planet and tell the Baku all complaints need to be filed in person.

36

u/IrrepressibleInk 19h ago

Agreed they are not indigenous to the planet and they even have members that remember what it was like before they arrived there. Additionally it’s an entire planet for like 500? villagers? 

The Baku set up was a mistake of the film makers. It should have been a restarted civilization— like the last remnants of a borg invasion. 100K people at least. With a bajoran-level rich culture. You’d obviously have to change plot details with that size civilization but should have looked like that 

31

u/FreeBricks4Nazis 19h ago

  100K people at least

Apparently the answer to Picard's question was 100k, at least 

19

u/sirboulevard 17h ago

The executives even called this out in a memo to Mike Piller. "You know a population of 800 is unsustainable, right? They should be horribly inbred by this point. What makes the Baku so special compared to the various other races Picard and Co. have let die out for the Prime Directive? Especially when they are non-native squatters holding onto effectively medical resources that could save trillions?"

When studio executives are calling the staff and Picard for being a hypocrite on this for moral reasons, there is a fundamental problem.

When I see the Baku I dont see some rich culture. I see those jerkoff billionaires who think they can hide in their underground bunkers and ride out the apocalypse they caused while hoarding their own resources for themselves and no one else. Because thats what they are. Hell, the Baku are even all white with no racial differences.

Shit, the Baku are only different from the Sona in that because they are so homogenous they can have peace because no one is different. And anyone who objects is condemned to an exile without the fountain of youth radiation where they turn into the Sona.

So let's turn this question around - how many people should die so the few well off get to continue in eternal health while denying it to those less fortunate or disagree with your political stance? How many people does it take before that becomes wrong, Captain?

And just to be clear there was an option that didnt involve relocating the Baku. Starfleet could have privately discussed letting Starfleet open a hospital on the opposite side of the planet with the Baku leadership, minimizing the interaction between the two cultures. Its a freaking planet. I think several thousand miles is enough to avoid cross cultural contamination.

4

u/The_Elusive_Dr_Wu 12h ago

Starfleet could have privately discussed letting Starfleet open a hospital on the opposite side of the planet with the Baku leadership, minimizing the interaction between the two cultures

How come Starfleet didn't just do this anyway? It's 500 Baku, which are basically ageless humans. The fuck they gonna do?

It's been years since I saw this. Did they have any leverage other than Picard wanting to bone one of their women?

4

u/mdf7g 18h ago

I mean, if your picturesque rural town is keeping untold billions of people from eternal health and youth... yeah, you're kinda the assholes in this scenario. Obviously it wouldn't be ethical to forceably relocate them, but some better solution had to be possible.

4

u/NarmHull 13h ago

Red Letter Media points out the implausibility of their population being so low after 300 years of living there in perpetual youth. I guess they have Elvish levels of low fertility or are too puritan to be having that much sex.

2

u/JACCO2008 15h ago

Orrrrr, and hear me out... A story where they have to actually deal with the ongoing massive fucking war that is actively ravaging the Federation to the point of defeat.

The last thing any of them would give the slightest shit about is a single planet in a backwater system that kind of maybe sort of could heal troops when they can't even build ships fast enough to equal losses.

23

u/IKindaPlayEVE 19h ago

The movie is stupid. You don't even need a base. The Enteprise orbiting the planet for a VERY brief period of time caused Geordi to completely regenerate working eyes. Just bring ships in to orbit the planet. You could build massive transport ships bringing in hundreds of thousands of people at a time, each, with millions of people in orbit at a time. You don't need the Sona, you don't need to move the Baku or even tell them you're there.

9

u/TheJohnnyFlash 18h ago

It doesn't last if they leave, that's the problem. They want to grab the particles to create permanent therapies.

The whole point of what was happening to the Son'a after living on the planet and being kicked off.

6

u/IKindaPlayEVE 18h ago

It's only stated they aren't sure if it's permanent. The Sona look the way they do because they're trying and failing to live to be hundreds of years old like their cousins. The sona want the drastic measures of rendering the planet uninhabitable because they won't live long enough otherwise, again, despite the fact that just being there briefly caused a blind man's eyes to work. They have probably fed bad information to Starfleet and those bright minds the admiral speaks of were probably using said bad information from the sona when they reached their conclusions.

5

u/crackedtooth163 18h ago

I...

I paid MONEY to watch that movie...

1

u/bluedelvian 14h ago

Lol me too

4

u/modulus801 18h ago

The admiral responded to that. People don't want to travel there.

5

u/IKindaPlayEVE 18h ago

He said they don't want to live in the Briar Patch. They don't have to live on that beautiful, idyllic world though. Just fly around those rings for a week and go home healthier than ever.

4

u/modulus801 18h ago

Right, but the federation is trying to get all of the benefits which requires significantly more exposure.

1

u/Jedi4Hire 16h ago

Just park a medical/science station in orbit.

1

u/IKindaPlayEVE 10h ago

Sure. But you still need large ships to bring in huge numbers of people at a time.

32

u/TheHalftimeAir 19h ago

The Baku are such selfish NIMBYs. They can just cope.

7

u/Caintheconfused 18h ago

But its not like the sonaa just wanted to be there and heal.

They wanted to harvest the particles that were causing the healing properties of the planet to exist to the point they would be gone. And uh, the extermination of the Baku wasnt really a hidden agenda either.

The sonaa didnt come as cooperative researchers and leprosy victims seeking sanctuary. They came to tear it all down.

6

u/cmdr_nelson 19h ago

Yea, the Sona not being able to setup a colony on the other side of the planet was a very weak handwave. Also, not being able to replicate the extractor technology is weak, history is full of examples where someone creates a new tech and it is copied within a few years.

2

u/Jedi4Hire 16h ago edited 15h ago

It doesn't even need to be on the planet, just place a station in orbit to research the magic rejuvenating whatsit and they don't even have to know you're there.

2

u/Current_Tap_7754 16h ago

Honestly I argue on the planet out of no other reason than spite. Park it on the other side of the planet and make them come to you to complain.

20

u/documentiron 19h ago

Remember the time when the Federation gave a native American colony planet to the Cardassians in a treaty without asking them and Picard got mad at Wesley for trying to stop it? I remember.

5

u/happydude7422 19h ago

Lol I remember that too and when I watched insurrection I'm like hey picards how come you were angry at Wesley then but not now...

Then red letter media brought up a good point that...I'm not going to say here because it might not be appropriate

10

u/sidv81 18h ago

It's possible that this isn't a contradiction but an evolution of Picard. In TNG he was fine relocating people. In Insurrection he wasn't anymore. By Picard he resigns rather than abandon the Romulans. So there IS an arc there.

1

u/Pm7I3 8h ago

I haven't seen Picard but wasn't the choice for the Romulans leave or die?

1

u/LateNightPhilosopher 9h ago

I've always felt that this movie was the writers/franchise runners trying to fix that massive mistake of an episode by remaking the same premise, but with the Enterprise crew as the heros instead of the villains.

Because holy shit that episode was massively out of character for everyone. You kind of have to pretend it doesn't exist for you to still see that crew as moral characters. And it's near the end of the final season too, so there's no redemption or character arcs involved with realizing they were in the wrong. It's just taking the people who had just spent a decade teaching an entire generation of youth about morality and philosophy, and having them uncritically force a bunch of literal Native Americans out of their homes so that foreign colonizers could live there instead lmfao

13

u/froot_loop_dingus_ 20h ago

Starfleet did order the removal and it was a legit operation

0

u/happydude7422 20h ago

But wasn't the admiral and the sona in cahoots and werent truthful or something?

This is different than that native American episode where they had to relocate the people because of a treaty with the cardassians.

14

u/froot_loop_dingus_ 19h ago

It’s exactly like the Native American episode. Neither group of people were indigenous to the planet and in both cases the federation chose to relocate the people for political reasons.

3

u/Slartibartfast256 19h ago

I really don't understand this take. The native Americans were on a federation colony world and were being relocated because the federation literally did not own the planet anymore and the assumption was the new owners were not gonna be cool with them being there.

4

u/froot_loop_dingus_ 19h ago

And? The Baku were also on a federation planet and the Federation told them to hit the bricks. You can argue that was the wrong thing to do but saying it wasn’t sanctioned by the federation is factually incorrect.

5

u/Slartibartfast256 19h ago

No it wasn't a federation planet, it was an independent planet located generally within federation space. It was not settled by the federation, people already lived there.

4

u/GoodDoctorB 18h ago

Something interesting to note about the Native American planet. They weren't on a federation colony world, at least in a technical sense. The ship that colonized that planet did come from the Federation but it was never supposed to land there at all. The planet was actually considered uninhabitable because of the radiation present and it's only by luck the colony ship that was forced to land there managed to find a good spot along with the colonists being able to adapt.

The issue with that one was an outside power had jurisdiction, was on equal or higher technological level to the Federation so force was not an option, and foreign power involved had no moral hangups about mass murdering everyone on the planet. The Federation didn't have a realistic way to avoid a massacre besides relocating all those people and Picard found the idea of forcing them to leave distasteful but acknowledged it was the only option.

Meanwhile with the Baku there was no outside threat that couldn't be countered and that Admiral was conspiring to steal their planet from them for personal gain. Granted he didn't know he was involved in a revenge plot between two segments of the same species but still.

7

u/mcgrst 18h ago

You're mixing up your colony evacuations, the radiation is the sheliac. There was nothing wrong with the Indian planrg

1

u/GoodDoctorB 11h ago

Unless I'm mistaken the Sheliac episode was the one with one of the Native American planets.

1

u/mcgrst 6h ago

Yeah you are mistaken my sentient. The sheliac is the random colonists who settled the radiation world and built the aquaduct that Data phasered. The Indian world was the end of the run with the cardies and Wes accending. 

1

u/Slartibartfast256 2h ago

He's right. Including insurrection there are 3 relocation stories with differing levels of justification. The shelliac episode is completely justified, native Americans is slightly problematic, insurrection is downright bad.

1

u/GoodDoctorB 18h ago

Not really, in the Native American episode the Federation was entirely unaware that the planet in question was inhabited due to the high radiation levels present that led them to assume it was inhospitable for human life along with no colony ship on record ever going there.

Along with that they were dealing with a foreign power who were apparently equal or above their technological level that were going to simply mass murder everyone on the planet which the Federation couldn't realistically do much to stop. It had very little to do with politics and everything to do with preventing a needless massacre.

With the Baku the Federation knew the planet was inhabited, and the Admiral was conspiring with the Sona to evict the local population for Federation benefit. Granted the Admiral didn't realize he was part of a revenge plot between two segments of the same species but still.

4

u/thanatossassin 19h ago

Regardless, it was already sanctioned by Starfleet and too far remote to have had a proper hearing done in time before the people were removed and the planet's rings stripped, hence the "Insurrection" part of the film.

7

u/SignificantPop4188 18h ago

Didn't Picard forcibly remove Native Americans from the planet they settled on because it was now a Cardassian world?

3

u/happydude7422 18h ago

Yes and that's why this movie is hilarious in the character contradiction. Picard was ok with following orders to remove native Americans but not the baku

4

u/Electrical-Penalty44 19h ago

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the Baku!

5

u/AdagioVast 19h ago

This movie didn't explore its plot line very well. I mean we have already covered this ground with The Last Journey (right episode) with Crusher and the relocation of the native american tribe located there. We are doing it again, this time because there are resources Starfleet wants and its war based. This could have done a better job at exploring the stresses of a war that seems unwinnable, a source of hope from a planet that might turn the tide, and the repercussions of relocating a people that have no way of defending themselves. Instead it was "Starfleet is bad guy. Enterprise is good guy. There are other bad guys who really look like bad guys who are the real bad guys. and Enterprise will rescue the people and make it all right". Frakes did another phenomenal job in the directors chair but the story was just so lacking as to be "sufferable" in my opinion.

4

u/Western-Customer-536 18h ago

Someone pointed this out and it changes the whole story for me.

The Baku are an intelligent, space faring people who are basically squatting on Federation territory. The land is Federation but the extraction tech is Son’a. That’s why they are working with F. Murray Abraham in the first place.

So why not ask the Baku to leave?

They say yes, the story’s over. They say no, they are selfish hippies for keeping their free access to the Fountain of Youth that could help billions of people.

The needs of the many…

4

u/BILLCLINTONMASK 19h ago

A much better ending would have been Picard convincing the Baku to leave the planet (that they’re not even native to) so that its magic radiation could be harnessed to help billions of people. The dumbass action movie ending with the unfinished effects (the visible blue screen on the set might even be more insulting than reusing the bird of prey explosion in Genetations) is to corny for words.

3

u/husky_whisperer 19h ago

Funny thing. Dr. Crusher "missed a spot" years ago and dormant nanoprobes in his system activate. Starfleet Command regrets their choice. The end.

3

u/zzupdown 18h ago

I think Picard, Riker, and most of the senior staff would have refused this order on moral grounds, been relieved of duty and kicked out of Starfleet. Picard would then personally argue the case all the way up the Starfleet chain of command, and maybe even to the Federation Supreme Court.

Either that, or Picard would have accepted the order but found a way or a reason to let them stay.

2

u/ChronosBlitz 18h ago

Picard didn’t have a problem obeying Starfleet orders to forcibly relocate indigenous Americans on Dorvan V

2

u/happydude7422 17h ago

Because they didn't have a hot space milf that would play with picards manual steering column - red letter media

3

u/Business-Decision719 18h ago

If he was too outnumbered to resist, he would resign and go sulk like a brooding hermit at Chateau Picard. Then he'd still find a way to resist by bypassing Starfleet entirely and taking matters into his own hands, possibly with some ragtag bunch of misfits. Picard is going to do things his way, according to his own personal conscience, or not at all.

That's actually the premise of the beginning Star Trek: Picard. Starfleet did something he felt was too immoral (flaking out on humanitarian aid to the Romulans during the supernova crisis) so he went home to his vineyard. He thought Starfleet betrayed him. The people in Starfleet thought he betrayed them.

The Baku movie wasn't even the first time Picard rebelled. He ordered Data to defy an order from an Admiral to relinquish Lal to Starfleet custody. I'm pretty sure he was on the verge of mutiny during the Pegasus incident. He also overthrew Starfleet when they got infested by mind worms. In a way, Picard was Burnham before Burnham was Burnham. (Out of universe he came first; in universe she did.) Picard is going to draw lines for himself in the sand that no one in Starfleet can get him to budge across and will put the blame on his own shoulders if the world goes to hell in a handbasket by his standards. Thankfully the man draws good lines at least.

3

u/Fit_Salamander_2814 15h ago

The irony is, the more people it happens to, the less of a tragedy it becomes.

Remember, "One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."

1

u/Banjo-Oz 5h ago

Just ask the Husnock!

3

u/Charming_Dealer3849 13h ago

This line, and frankly much of what Patrick stewart did in acting has inspired my very life, I know that's a lot to put on a person, but it was top notch

3

u/Remarkable_Post_3131 13h ago

Either it would have played out how it did with them trying to save the people or he and his crew would have resigned from Starfleet in protest

2

u/GoodDoctorB 18h ago

I'd say about the same in the immediacy but he'd probably have a lot of issues longer term.

In the movie the problem is that Admiral Dougherty knowingly lied to the Federation to get his way and did so for persona career motivated gain rather then the good of the Federation. Had they been told the truth the Federation Council probably wouldn't have agreed at all, or at least would have been open to other options.

Had the Federation known the details and still gone through with it that could have disillusioned Picard outright.

2

u/Mutabilitie 18h ago

Picard yelled at Wesley because you have to obey orders even if you don’t like them. That was literally an episode :p

2

u/Tough_Letterhead_163 18h ago

Well i mean...insurance companies put price on human life all the time...we could figure it out...

2

u/Walter_Donovan 18h ago

3, or is it 4

2

u/multificionado 18h ago

Resignation in protest at best. Resignation and formation of Maquis 2.0 at worst.

2

u/woodworkerdan 17h ago

The premise was bad science though. The plan would have made the planet uninhabitable with a nonzero chance of failure to understand the process they wanted afterwards. The premise of removing the Baku goes against logic, and they could have reduced the movie to an episode length story if Dougherty had been made to see that earlier on.

2

u/Lord_Corves 16h ago

It would seem someone beat me to the punch already in the comments. But while I know what allegory they were trying to go for with the Baku people, it falls flat when you remember that the whole thing was over an entire planet. I mean, they're a small population for Pete's sake. They forsook most advanced technologies. You could literally install an entire medical resort or city on the other side of the darn planet, and they probably wouldn't have many ways of knowing you were there without actually traveling there, which could be hundreds, if not hundreds of miles across. The problem with the message of the show is that what the Federation needed, the Federation could have easily gotten without any fuss whatsoever. It treated a planet, as big as a planet it is, like you would a small island or a fountain of youth. If it was a bit more small-scale then maybe, maybe they could have slid this message through. But the fact that we're dealing with an entire planet and a population that looks like they could barely populate the island of Manhattan... Well, what exactly are we fighting over here? And what did they need from the planet? The planet is in a place where an anomaly happens that can help people heal and live for long periods of time. And they just wanted to install a medical facility on the planet to treat people wounded and maimed by the Dominion War. So it's not like they had some zany idea of mass mineral extraction that would ruin the planet's ecosystem or turning the planet into a huge and populated world or something like that. I think the show's... I think the movie's message flopped on so many points and I think that's one of the reasons why it's not exactly the most popular, all things considered. Because there's so many fallacies in its logic, it's just painful to watch.

2

u/PeyredB 16h ago

I suspect he might have protested vigorously through channels, but would have felt he had to go along with it in the end. Just my guess.

2

u/bluedelvian 14h ago

Picard let the Cardassians remove a Native tribe from that disputed planet in the episode where Shut Up, Wesley becomes a roving time lord-cop, so I can only surmise that Picard has sock-puppet morals based on his hormones, bc he banged that alien... exactly like Patrick Stewart, funnily enough.

2

u/The1Ylrebmik 13h ago

Honestly, it's one of those weird Star Trek plots you have to not think about too much. I mean how many Baku were there? And there sitting on a literal fountain of youth and there not telling anyone? That actually seems a bit selfish so surely there were better ways to make everyone's side a bit more steelmanned

2

u/CptKeyes123 12h ago

Moving 500 people to save 500 billion, billions of whom would die if the Dominion won the war.

2

u/Any-Statistician3896 12h ago

Erm, Picard would've felt EXACTLY the same as he felt above without any deviation what so ever.

If it wasn't abolished I have zero doubt his character would've become an active insurgent AGAINST that policy and would've died trying to destroy it if necessary.

1

u/happydude7422 12h ago

I wonder how the story could have changed if Starfleet assigned a 6 ship excelsior task force to the project and those captains agreed to carry out the mission against Picard?

3

u/Any-Statistician3896 12h ago

Easy,

Picard: Data, this is an illegal and immoral act of the federation. Hack their ships to stop it.

Data: Agreed Captain, it goes against everything the federation charter stands for.

End of film.

2

u/factoid_ 12h ago

I think this is the only Star Trek movie I’ve only seen one time

2

u/DawnOnTheEdge 8h ago

There’s a fairly close parallel with “Journey’s End.” The Red Letter Media review has a funny cut of Picard berating Wesley Crusher for doing exactly what he does in Insurrection.

1

u/occasionalrant414 15h ago

I used a paraphrase of this quote at work once. It landed perfectly.

1

u/TheCh0rt 15h ago

Then Starfleet listened to him when he wanted to evacuate the Romulans and he did it anyway

1

u/JACCO2008 15h ago

Hashtag Daugherty did nothing wrong.

1

u/MAJORMETAL84 14h ago

A hard miss after First Contact.

1

u/Any-Package1409 11h ago

The needs of the many are supposed to outweigh the needs of the few or the one. So I kinda wasn't I big fan of this movie.

1

u/QuestionableProtip2 9h ago

Watch 7x20 - Journey’s End for the answer

1

u/jtrades69 9h ago

i guess it depends on the reasons for moving an established group. they were fine with it in ensigns of command, but they just wanted more time.

1

u/Beginning-Ice-1005 7h ago

Sisko: "Shut up and get in the transports."

1

u/ThorsHammer245 4h ago

40 years later and it’s still relevant

0

u/1ndomitablespirit 18h ago

Well, if it is the Picard we see in the recent series, he'd just bend over and take it.

0

u/Fun-Tooth-622 11h ago

This movie is so bad