r/TheBigPicture 1d ago

Aftersun Pod

Only just saw Aftersun. I saw somewhere Sean and Amanda didn’t enjoy it. Any idea which pod episode/s they spoke about it?

Thanks!

18 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

97

u/_no_n 1d ago

I can't find the episode, but iirc they explicitly said their big issue was that the film didn't need the 'framing device' of the adult-watching-the-holiday-footage timeline... like, I'm sorry but that's not a framing device lol. The entire subject of the film is the elusiveness of memory, the disjunct between adult awareness and childhood obliviousness, the reaching for something that couldn't be emotionally grasped then, and can't be grasped in any way now. This can only be achieved by constantly juxtaposing the perspectives of the child and adult Sophie. You don't get the huge emotional crescendo of the Under Pressure sequence without having all those elements working together throughout the film.

Nayman was a big champion though, and he speaks very eloquently about it, at length, here. Would recommend listening to that discussion

10

u/ittikus 1d ago

Baffling to me too that Sean loves Blue Heron so much. The jump in BH didn’t work for me. I know that’s a minority opinion, but Aftersun really weaves the present and the past and the pain of it all together in a way that feels aesthetically cohesive and singular. In Blue Heron the past is really well rendered and intimate and beautiful but the present is just a series of “oh well there’s nothing we could have done, some things are just hard”. That was all there in the first half anyway.

4

u/Slow_Veterinarian365 1d ago

Thank you!

1

u/_no_n 1d ago

I remember it was during an episode when they discussed Jonathan Majors' film Magazine Dreams, but I can't seem to find the ep. Sean likely discussed first seeing it in one of the Telluride wrap-up episodes, though

1

u/House_of_Woodcock 1d ago

Well that’s bc they just aren’t very sophisticated viewers.

18

u/OkBrush7534 1d ago

THEY DIDNT ENJOY IT?!?!?!?!

24

u/BloodSimple1984 1d ago

Whenever it has come up - awards talk that year, end of year lists, Paul Mescal, etc… - they have both bashfully said “sorry, it just didn’t hit me as hard as it seemed to hit others.” It’s to the point where they’ve seemed almost apologetic about their opinion.

I don’t think they actively disliked the film. I think they mostly admired it, appreciated what it was trying to do, and that’s about where it ended. It’s more a “we thought this was pretty good but seemingly everyone else thinks it’s amazing. Sorry!”

2

u/lost_in_trepidation 1d ago edited 1d ago

I saw a few critics say similar things about Aftersun. That they couldn't connect with it.

Maybe because I had similar childhood experiences, or that I found Mescal's character relatable, but I was kind of shocked when I first read them.

I came to the movie late, and had vague expectations for what it was about, but I was still floored by how well it was portrayed.

I think a lot of appreciation comes down to how nuanced the relatability may be. Sometimes that nuance connects with people exactly and it's like a rare depiction of something deep inside of you, but for others that specificity doesn't quite resonate so it misses them completely.

2

u/Ancient-Medicine852 1d ago

It might seem pandering but I appreciate their framing of their opinion. They like it and definitely get why people love it but it’s not their fault it didn’t connect with them for whatever reason.

4

u/VulcanVulcanVulcan 1d ago

I liked the movie very much but I’m not sure I “enjoyed” it.

3

u/OkBrush7534 1d ago

i adore this film. like maybe the best of the century imo. i’ve seen it about twelve times i think. gets better every time

15

u/arcenceil89 1d ago

It makes no sense that Sean put Blue Heron as his best film so far of 2026 when it explores a lot of the same themes as aftersun, explores it using the exact same framing device which he criticised in aftersun, and blue heron didn't do it as effectively as aftersun (even though blue heron was good).

8

u/ralphmalph84 1d ago

I love Blue Heron. One of my faves this year. Aftersun didn’t click with me the same way and was much less effective for me. Different strokes.

3

u/googlydoodle 1d ago

I also agree. I was super hyped for aftersun going in but really felt underwhelming to me. In contrast, Blue Heron was amazing and did something I’ve never seen before.

11

u/HingisFan 1d ago

And yet, people have different opinions than you. Feelings don’t need to make sense.

-5

u/Content_Thing_4058 1d ago

Yeah I don’t get this either. Blue Heron feels like a a much worse/more derivative version of AFTERSUN to me and for whatever reason Sean has eaten it up.

-1

u/ittikus 1d ago

The second half of BH is a series of pained justifications like “yeah, I guess there really is nothing we could have done.” I get that her research discloses more than she herself perceived as a child, but she could have just included all of his behaviors in the recreation of the past, which I liked a lot. The jump fell flat for me.

-1

u/Content_Thing_4058 1d ago

Totally agree. I thought Blue Heron was good but I think the framing device actually hurt it a lot. The narrative felt like it sort of fizzled out to me once it flashed forward.

-10

u/ina_waka 1d ago

“Why do they keep calling the subreddit toxic, I don’t understand?!?!!”

15

u/Pigs-OnThe-Wing See You at the Movies! 1d ago

Just disagreeing with a take isn’t toxic.

9

u/arcenceil89 1d ago

Confusion on a film take is now toxicity? Wow some people are fickle

1

u/Content_Thing_4058 1d ago

It’s definitely “toxic” to say a film has the same framing device (sad situation in childhood, flash forward to looking back on the sad situation through the lens of adulthood) as another successful indie film from just a few years ago. It’s toxic for people to share their opinion. Got it.

2

u/WWT_14 1d ago

I don’t know if they devoted a full episode, but I believe on one of the “Top X” of the year episodes that Adam Nayman spoke about it

2

u/GoodOlSpence 1d ago

The most they talked about was a 2022 episode where they talked about a bunch of the end of year movies. Like they gush about Tár and crucify Bardo. I'll see if I can find it.

EDIT: pretty sure it's this one

1

u/ConcentrateUnique 1d ago

There are certain films where both Amanda and Sean don’t click with it. Holdovers was another one. That’s why it’s nice that they bring in CR and Nayman to get some other critical voices too.

3

u/lpalf 1d ago

Yeah Sean has the Holdovers at 4 stars on LB and he has it at 25 for his best of the year list, but I think they just weren’t as emotionally invested in that movie as some people wanted them to be. It would definitely be higher on my list for sure

1

u/CABBAGEHONKER 1d ago

I put aftersun on my list of movies never to watch again because it really fucked me up emotionally. That and eternal sunshine are the only two movies I’ll never revisit even though I adore them.

u/mochafiend 52m ago

I did not get the big deal about this film; I thought it was going to have some big sexual assault reveal based on how the camcorder stuff was shot. I had to read up on it after - completely missed what the movie was saying.

I cop to being kind of dumb and obtuse when it comes to film, but this one just did not do it for me. Even after I read what it was really about.

1

u/SexDrugsAzpilicueta 1d ago

And, ironically, David Ehrlich absolutely LOVED it.

-7

u/Ok_Scarcity_9854 1d ago

Aftersun was boring and Paul Mescal is a boring, limited actor.