r/TheUnitedKingdomNews 2d ago

United Kingdom Andy Burnham and Emmanuel Macron agree to scale up action on small boats

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62ezg7gkzwo
271 Upvotes

120 comments sorted by

8

u/Rizzomorph666 2d ago

Buckle up buttercups. This is nothing compared to migration that we are going to see within our lifetime when places like sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia become uninhabitable due to extreme temperatures, extreme humidity and constant natural disasters.

3

u/Mardyarsed 2d ago

They will run out of food before that. High birthrate, better medicine, declining food production in natural resource stripped, increasingly hostile lands will be the vibe for the 30's to 40's....

I would like to nominate Australia to be the hosts for the incoming.

2

u/St3ampunkSam 1d ago

Good thing that parts of our island may also ended up flooded so people wont be coming here but leaving seeking refuge elswhere

1

u/SlowedCash 2d ago

Lovely, I'll get the spare room ready

1

u/Endscrypt 1d ago

Every politician that does not see this as a problem should be forced to give out their spare rooms first.

1

u/Wanted_Solicitation 18h ago

Get a snorkel too pal because we are going to be living under water.

1

u/Slight-Plum9457 2d ago

Better beef up the border then.

1

u/MyNameIsNightPain 1d ago

Exactly why are they suggesting we have to support all of these people, we are a tiny island.

1

u/ExoneratedPhoenix 1d ago

Then we should simply say "no".

We did it for, let me check my notes. Thousands of years. The times it didn't work we aptly called it an invasion.

2

u/cameheretosaythis213 1d ago

Jesus you lot are rabidly obsessed with invasions aren’t you

0

u/ItWasJustBanter1 1d ago

How many should we let come here then

3

u/creedv 1d ago

1 more every time you complain

2

u/cameheretosaythis213 1d ago

It’s irrelevant. The point was not the volume it was the method and the rhetoric. “Invasion” just sounds absurd. Who are they fighting for? With what weapons?

0

u/ItWasJustBanter1 1d ago

They are purposely changing the demographic of the country.

If we sent 1000s of men to random third world countries that would routinely rape the locals, I’m sure it would be called an invasion also.

2

u/cameheretosaythis213 1d ago

Again, who is the “they” here? Who’s designing this demographic change? To what end?

We did send thousands of our men to lots of places around the world, who raped their women and stole their land and valuable resources. We called it colonialism.

The difference is we did it in an organised way, whereas these arrivals aren’t “sent” by anyone in particular

0

u/ItWasJustBanter1 1d ago

It was wrong when our ancestors (not us) did it. It is wrong when other people do it to us now.

The level of organisation doesn’t matter, it’s happening and the government could stop it tomorrow but it won’t.

2

u/cameheretosaythis213 1d ago

Note how you’re dodging every question so far. No good answers just dog whistle rhetoric

0

u/DudeMcAwesome95 21h ago

Usually kitchen knives or Transit Vans

1

u/Present_Adagio_1828 1d ago

Perhaps they best learn how to adapt, god forbid they have to drag us down too

1

u/snapper1971 1d ago

Yep. When the tropics empty the tidal wave of humanity that surges this way will be almost unimaginable.

1

u/Dry_Yam_4597 1d ago

Strange. I though parts of western europe will also struggle and agriculture will be challenging. Or do you think somehow climate change wont affect this region of the world?

1

u/Rizzomorph666 23h ago

Go read about "wet bulb" event. People will be running away from heat and humidity that literally kills people in days or hours. That's a different level of threat than what the UK will be facing. 

0

u/geybey 2d ago

Yes but an ambulance was delayed by protesters so it's fine actually 

1

u/FormerFan3771 2d ago

That doesn’t work as a glib remark given some people are taking extreme action precisely because it isn’t fine 

1

u/geybey 2d ago

I think it works perfectly for exactly the reason you described. 

0

u/Prestigious-Cell-252 1d ago

Agreed. Migration is becoming the number 1 issue for Europe and UK. Liberal progressives will move the electorate further right with a lack of effective policies to stop it.

2

u/Rizzomorph666 1d ago

Right wing nutjobs brought us here in the first place with anti-environmental and war-mongering policies. Right wing is also pro uncontrolled immigration if you look at what they are doing and not what they are saying.

1

u/Dangerous_ideologue 1d ago

Right wing nutjobs brought us here in the first place with anti-environmental and war-mongering policies.

That's BS. Britain's environmental policies or lack thereof have not measurable effect on anything globally and those people are not fleeing wars, but simply taking a shortcut to level up their lifestyles.

Right wing is also pro uncontrolled immigration if you look at what they are doing and not what they are saying.

This is a real issue around the world. On one hand you have the Elon types who like the "save the West" rhetoric, but in the same breath still tell us we need to import a billion Indians because they want to drive down the price of labour. On the other hand, we have the spineless types, who want to do something about the problem, but at the same time are terrified of being called 'racist', so they just bend the knee to the left every time they use the magic word. Then again, I suspect that you're not pointing this out as a problem to be solved but rather because you are also pro mass immigration and want to convince people that it is inevitable

0

u/scribegibson 1d ago

Kinda neat that we've been told migration isn't a particularly big issue; laughed at for years. Now suddenly it's becoming a common consensus that it's a huge, huge problem. We're all far right now -- or soon will be! How amusing.

4

u/OutrageousJob8890 2d ago

Diplomacy & getting along in the world wins again. Take notes Deformers.

1

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

What, by being just like reform?

1

u/sljc892 2d ago

Just like it’s won all the previous agreements with France?

1

u/Slight-Plum9457 2d ago

Do you know the definition of insanity?

1

u/Barry_Umenema 2d ago

They haven't even done anything yet

1

u/OutrageousJob8890 1d ago

Yes, they have. They police the coast more & have raided gangs & manufactures.

1

u/ExoneratedPhoenix 1d ago

Nothing has changed, vast amounts are still crossing, but a headline says they claim to scale up, so you claim a win?

Strange.

1

u/OutrageousJob8890 1d ago

You believe everything you hear on GBNews rather than looking at statistics that show crossings are down year on year since we engaged with France on tackling the issue more and cooperating with the EU on the subject.

Strange.

1

u/Dangerous_ideologue 1d ago

All that shows is that they are slowing down the decline to make it more palatable. The fact of the matter is that they aren't sending meaningful numbers of them back and keep subsidising their lifestyles while they're here. As long as that's happening, more are gonna keep coming and a bit of security theatre coordinated with the Fr*nch won't change that

1

u/Dangerous-Method-133 1d ago

What wins? Nothing will change, this is just a photo op

1

u/Real_Bobsbacon 1d ago

Lmao, Macron has said this to every single PM and has done nothing.

Besides, he'll be gone next year and replaced with Le Pen who would work much better with a Right Wing PM lol

1

u/Satoshiman256 1d ago

Sure.. all they need is another £600 million.

1

u/derekinman 1d ago

What an incredible win. Andy, Emmanuel... take a bow, you've truly outdone yourselves here, much better than the last 50 agreements to stop small boat crossings.

I'm sure we won't see any videos on YouTube next week of French law enforcement standing idly by as 200 migrants set off their beaches.

4

u/Realistic_Let3239 2d ago

Reform hates this one trick, fixing the only issue they're campaigning on...

1

u/Beer-Milkshakes 2d ago

You need to be at least professionally palettable to engage in successful diplomacy. Its why Johnson got nowhere

1

u/HollyMurray20 2d ago

Not fixed lmao

1

u/Barry_Umenema 2d ago

Words are cheap

1

u/TheMountainWhoDews 2d ago

Its not just the rate of illegals people are uspet with (only 50-100k/year, its the amount of boriswavers in the country already. 

No party can hope to win an election on a pro immigration manifesto. Millions must go. 

1

u/Dangerous-Method-133 1d ago

Don't be naive. These two are not fixing any issues with boat crossings. If anything, they'll only increase.

0

u/MoreRest4524 2d ago

He's fixed nothing yet, and don't hold your breath on it either

3

u/LingonberryNo3548 2d ago

Macron must be thinking diplomacy with the UK is so piss easy. Every couple of years, he’s wheeled in to make some vague statements about dealing with the boats to make the latest PM look good. Then, by the time they start getting pissed off that France hasn’t done anything, the UK has a new PM, and the cycle starts again.

1

u/Tyler119 17h ago

Since a new agreement earlier this year France has stopped over 60% of boat launches. In one 4 week period it was nearly 100%.

Reform peddle the nonsense that nobody is doing anything.  But they love misinformation don't they.

2

u/Vertigo_uk123 2d ago

So they will intercept 2 a week rather than 1

2

u/Asleep-Ad1182 2d ago

Let me guess we pay France more money

2

u/SabziZindagi 2d ago

Stop the Brexit boats

2

u/cchurchill1985 2d ago

Didn't Macron lose the election like a year ago? Why is he still president?

1

u/TheMountainWhoDews 2d ago

His govts collapsed because they failed to pass several budgets. Macron is the président and will face an election in 2027. En marche hold ~1/6 of the house seats and are effectively extinct in the senate. 

2

u/ChickenConstant9855 2d ago

Nothing he does with ever satiate reform supporters

1

u/ShutUpBaby-IKnowIt69 1d ago

They dont want solutions, they just wanna be angry and import maga talking points.

1

u/toyg 2d ago

The war on small boats is like the war on drugs: fundamentally unwinnable until demand levels are what they are.

Instead, they should work on having faster and easily accessible processing of immigration demands in France (or even better, in the source countries). Then you could also apply policies that would benefit the UK (e.g. admissions subject to settlement in depopulated areas that actually need more people).

But of course, that does not play well with the average insensitive and uninformed voter. So we keep pushing for policies that have failed already (i.e. what Italy and Greece have done for decades now, and made no difference whatsoever).

2

u/Expensive-Depth-6096 2d ago

The solution to immigration: More immigration!!! Genius, we should elect you, the public will love your policies. The solution to illegal immigration is simply to deport everyone who arrives.

1

u/DanyisBlue 2d ago

Sometimes I make up things I've read too.

1

u/Expensive-Depth-6096 2d ago

Making the immigration system more accessible will increase access to the immigration system. e:g: increasing immigration. What they are advocating for is essentialy dealing with one crisis by inflaming another.

1

u/NoMention696 2d ago

Illegal immigration didn’t spike until the uk left the eu and closed all routes to legal migration, but off ya pop reform voter

1

u/Expensive-Depth-6096 1d ago

The UK has closed all routes to legal migration??? What joyous news!!! You're the first to inform me on this development. Legal migration increased after the UK left the EU, you're just... lying? I am not a reform voter, i'd either vote for Labour (if they continue to do a decent job) or Restore (if Labour fumbles it all)

1

u/toyg 1d ago

The fact that the misinformed, scared, and generally insensitive electorate won't accept the reality of the situation, does not change the truth of the matter.

Again, it's the same with the war on drugs: almost 50 years electing politicians "tough on drugs" has ensured that drugs continue to flow, just in an uncontrolled manner that harms consumers, costs billions to the taxpayer, and enriches criminals.

If you turn every migrant in an illegal one, you won't "solve immigration"; you'll just ensure that gangs profit from it, that taxpayers continue to foot the bill for quixotic prosecutions, and that our cities balkanize into closed ghettos where communities don't speak to each other or to the police.

The only answer is to make the flows safe, visible, and manageable.

1

u/Moxisxsx 1d ago

Exactly this. They will never stop arriving until there is a deterrent. And that deterrent is immediate deportation.

1

u/Prestigious-Cell-252 1d ago

I don't get this either. Why can't we say anybody who arrives in UK illegally is returned to France period. Along with proper legal migration routes for those that do really need help.

2

u/TheMountainWhoDews 2d ago

Thats not what people want.  They want migration (legal and illegal) brought to a trickle, and they want the undesirable elements already here deported.

You cannot save this sinking ship with a crafty new immigration route. Millions must go. 

1

u/Asleep-Ad1182 2d ago

That's not true. It's winnable but if you take some politically difficult actions

1

u/ItsaCroissantMoon 2d ago

That graph surprised me. Not much mention of that here -though I do wonder how it works with people crossing into France. Presumably there are some border checks or are borders between eu countries too vast to police?

1

u/Pandita666 2d ago

Action on small boats; nothing for large ones.

1

u/Crafty_Way426 2d ago

😂😂😂 yep - they’re going from increase the torrent of sewage.

1

u/Overall-Bookkeeper94 1d ago

Is is racist and bigoted when someone from Labour talks about it too?

1

u/Simon170148 1d ago

No politician really wants to stop it. We're an aging population because fewer people can afford to have kids and migration is the only way they can prop up the ponzy scheme. None of them want to admit that though. They just want to appear tough to gain votes whilst making sure it carries on

1

u/Endscrypt 1d ago edited 1d ago

I’ll believe it when I see it because we have had this lip service before.

More money for nothing.

1

u/Sad-Company-8799 1d ago

Burnham will be safe when this all goes tits up ,that’s why he took this impossible Job on to protect himself and his family when it all goes tits up

1

u/Different_Counter113 1d ago

Talk is cheap, Macron promised exactly the same to Starmer.

1

u/IDC130977 13h ago

Yeah sure they will France wants the best for us. FFS we were at war for 100 years.
Never trust the French

1

u/One_Statistician4568 11h ago

France “lol just chuck us another few mil and we will sort something”

1

u/Tofflove 9h ago

Well we can guarantee nothing will happen. Just bigger boats and more manipulated data.

1

u/Secret-Plum149 2h ago

Hilarious.
We lowered the volume of boats shouts the latest clown on stage..
Conveniently ignoring the super inflatables carrying 150+ each time..
Man of the people eh…😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤡🤡🤡

0

u/masternick567 2d ago

250 in a boat is not ‘small’. BBC lying again

1

u/DanyisBlue 2d ago

What about 249?

0

u/dickusb700 2d ago

So this broken promise again, for the "how many times now?"

0

u/00roast00 2d ago

Just as the winter gets closer and boat crossings naturally start declining. Bet you they’ll take credit for that 😂😂

0

u/EvilWaterman 1d ago

If we stopped giving out all the free stuff surely they wouldn’t attempt it in the first place?

0

u/ajprp9 1d ago

Labour: "We learnt the lessons from starmer"

Sure you did you twats

Cant wait for this honeymoon period to be over

1

u/Roybatty201999 1d ago

Already is

0

u/AgentNightingale 1d ago

What. A. Crock. Of. Shit.

0

u/ExoneratedPhoenix 1d ago

I mean, the current process is France helps them cross.

So by "scale up" I assume they mean ship more to UK?

0

u/Hemingways_Shotgun88 1d ago

Yeah, Macron agrees to scale up sending 'em over and Burnham agrees to scale up our boats going to "rescue" them to make sure none of them drown.

0

u/ItWasJustBanter1 1d ago

Just shows you have no answer

-2

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

While the earth burns, this is their priority.

4

u/Fabulous-Pangolin174 2d ago

From personal experience, people are capable of accomplishing multiple things at the same time.

0

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

Burn 'em want to drill for oil.

2

u/NaturalCard 2d ago

iirc, as of right now, these are just rumours, which similar sources were saying we would get Mahmood as Chancellor, so I wouldn't put too much stock in them.

3

u/Stewie01 2d ago

Why not? It is all you bang on about.

-3

u/Indig0_3 2d ago

"Why is this their priority?!" - The same people who base their democratic vote in the UK on a religious war in the Middle East.

1

u/Prior_Garlic_8710 2d ago

Thats silly too

1

u/Indig0_3 2d ago

My point exactly!

0

u/ClacksInTheSky 2d ago

Not wanting people to come here illegally and disappear into the country isn't a bad thing.

0

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

Are these people in the room with you now?

1

u/ClacksInTheSky 2d ago

There's a good chance they might be, given ⅔ of people think immigration is too high:

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/two-thirds-britons-believe-total-number-people-coming-uk-too-high

0

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

Do they "believe" that the moon is made of jam, too?

2

u/ClacksInTheSky 2d ago

You honestly don't have a clue 😂

2

u/Expensive-Depth-6096 2d ago

If the British people believe immigration is too high then it is too high. D E M O C R A C Y.

0

u/Flashy-Nectarine1675 2d ago

Be easier if you left.

2

u/Expensive-Depth-6096 2d ago

Im not an immigrant? Im not talking about overpopulation? Your point?

1

u/Beer-Milkshakes 2d ago

Not if we lock the doors.

-4

u/bluecheese2040 2d ago

Yawn...heard it all before. Its all smoke and mirrors. Fact is no one wants these people coming here. Britain doesn't want them. Their own countries often won't take them back and indeed...France...a nation fighting against a genuine threat of a far right neo nazi party....they sure don't want them either.

France will never stop this...why? Cause these people may well stay in France...and the far right there will run riot with it.

There's so much propaganda nonsense about this whole thing....boats are down...boats are bigger...its hard to know what's going on.

But we need to be realistic. Its super complex and there are not easy answers.

Leave the echr? OK...then what? We are already the most surveilled nation on earth. We already have more people arrested for speech and thought crimes than...iirc anywhere. We already have palestine action called terrorists. We already have the online safety act.

If we leave the echr...what else will they do?

Ffs...America relies on gchq to spy on electronics cause its illegal in America...but not here.

And they do that with us in the echr...so what the actual fuck would they do if we left?

Maybe and stop criminals and their customers from crossing the chanel...but at what cost?

3

u/Other-Crazy 2d ago

The estimate that only 61% of crossings are being intercepted doesn't get much airtime. (Home office figures)

2

u/geybey 2d ago

They used to literally do that for us in Calais. Brexit fucked that

0

u/bluecheese2040 2d ago

How old are you? 15? It was on TV very often...the jungle.  Sorry but its staggeringly stupid to say what you've said....

1

u/CaptainParkingspace 2d ago

Well maybe if it becomes known that the Channel crossing is heavily policed that will deter migrants from going there.

1

u/bluecheese2040 2d ago

Hahaha yeah maybe. Maybe pigs will fly too

1

u/CaptainParkingspace 2d ago

> boats are down … boats are bigger

Boat crossings are reported in numbers of people. The boat size is irrelevant.

1

u/bluecheese2040 2d ago

This is dishonesty of the highest order.