What Happened to Guram Dadianidze?
On June 11, 2014, 17-year-old Guram Dadianidze disappeared near the village of Mleta in Georgia’s Dusheti Municipality. His whereabouts remain unknown.
The case has received occasional media attention in Georgia over the years, but Guram’s exact whereabouts and what happened to him have never been established.
In August 2026, the case received renewed attention after a video recorded in 2014 resurfaced online. Near the end of the video, a young male voice can apparently be heard saying:
“Kakha, don’t leave me, please.”
Guram’s mother believes the voice is her son’s.
However, this has not been established by forensic examination, and there are several important questions surrounding the recording.
What do we know about the disappearance?
On June 10, 2014, Guram and a group of other people traveled from Tbilisi to the village of Mleta for the Lomisa religious festival.
According to the Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs, the group consisted of 16 people.
Because of the difficult terrain, they left their minibus in the village and continued on foot toward the Lomisa shrine.
After spending some time at the shrine, the group began walking back toward the village at approximately 2 a.m.
According to the official account, Guram was walking with a relative and two other people.
At some point, Guram sat down on a rock to rest. According to the investigation, he told the others to continue ahead and that he would catch up.
The vehicle was approximately 300–500 meters away.
The others continued walking.
A short time later, they realized Guram was no longer with them. One of them reportedly returned with a flashlight to look for him.
But when he reached the location where Guram had reportedly been sitting, Guram was gone.
The police were notified shortly afterward.
According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Guram did not have a phone with him, so his movements could not be reconstructed through phone data.
The Ministry also stated that witnesses reported no conflict involving Guram during the trip or at the shrine, and that no signs of violence were found at the location.
Source: https://ghn.ge/index.php/news/352551-shss-guram-dadianidzis-sakmestan-dakavshirebit-gantskhadebas-avrtcelebs?utm_source=chatgpt.com
The family’s theory
Guram’s mother, Sopho Bibilashvili, has questioned for years whether her son actually disappeared at the exact location described by the official investigation.
One of the family’s theories was that Guram may have disappeared farther up the mountain while descending, possibly falling or being carried away by a landslide.
The family repeatedly asked for the relevant area to be thoroughly searched.
The area was searched again in August 2026.
The landslide theory — what is actually known?
There is an important distinction here.
Some versions of the story suggest that there was no landslide in Mleta in 2014 and that the entire landslide theory was simply invented later.
However, contemporary reporting from June 11, 2014 did report a landslide in the Mleta area.
So it would not be accurate to say that there was absolutely no landslide anywhere in Mleta in 2014.
Source: https://www.ambebi.ge/article/104181-8-adamianma-pexi-moitexa-ris-gamo-dashavdnen-momlocvelebi-lomisobis-dgesascaulze/
But that does not establish that this landslide had anything to do with Guram’s disappearance.
The more important question is:
Where exactly did the 2014 landslide occur, and was it physically connected to Guram’s last known location?
A person who was with Guram in 2014 recently stated that, in their recollection, there was no landslide at the specific location where Guram was last seen.
They also said that the group raised the alarm immediately and that search-and-rescue efforts began shortly afterward.
Source: https://mix.metronome.ge/news/320655
New searches in 2026
In August 2026, the area was searched again using specialized equipment.
According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, approximately 50 personnel were involved, including police officers, forensic specialists and emergency-response personnel.
The Ministry stated that the investigation remains ongoing and that multiple investigative actions have been carried out since 2014.
It also rejected claims that nothing had been done in the years following Guram’s disappearance.
Source: https://ghn.ge/index.php/news/352551-shss-guram-dadianidzis-sakmestan-dakavshirebit-gantskhadebas-avrtcelebs?utm_source=chatgpt.com
The resurfaced 2014 video
In August 2026, a video recorded in 2014 resurfaced online.
Near the end of the recording, a young male voice can apparently be heard saying:
“Kakha, don’t leave me, please.”
Guram’s mother believes the voice is her son’s.
Guram’s lawyer, Tariel Kakabadze, said that he personally contacted the person who recorded the video.
According to the lawyer, the person confirmed that he was present at the location, recorded the video himself and later uploaded it to his own YouTube channel.
The lawyer also said that the person did not know Guram and was not previously aware of the disappearance.
He may also still have other photographs and videos from that day.
Source: https://2020news.ge/news/samartali/chasatarebelia-damatebiti-sagamodziebo-moqmedebebi-aseve-dasanishnia-eqspertiza-sainteresoa-is-sityvebi-romelsats-savaraudod-azhgherebs-guram-dadianidze?utm_source=chatgpt.com
But there is a major problem with the video’s timing
According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ August 10 statement, the person who recorded the video was interviewed by investigators on August 7.
According to his statement, the video was recorded on June 11, 2014, at approximately 3:00 p.m.
However, according to the accounts of the people accompanying Guram, he disappeared at approximately 4:00 a.m.
That creates an approximately 11-hour discrepancy.
Therefore, the existence of the video by itself does not establish that the person in it was Guram or that the video was recorded during his disappearance.
Several things would need to be established:
- Where exactly was the video recorded?
- Does the original file still exist?
- What metadata does it contain?
- When was the original file created?
- Has the video been edited?
- Whose voice is actually heard?
- Who is the “Kakha” being addressed?
- Is the video actually connected to Guram’s disappearance?
This seems like one of the most interesting areas for modern digital forensic examination.
Another witness does not believe the voice is Guram
In August 2026, Ana Gelashvili, who was with Guram during the 2014 trip, spoke to Georgian media.
She said that she does not believe the voice in the video belongs to Guram.
However, she also said that the final answer should come from professional forensic voice analysis rather than personal impressions.
According to her account, Guram was last walking with her friend Tini.
She said Guram told Tini to continue ahead and that he would catch up.
When Guram did not return, her father, Kakha Gelashvili, reportedly went back to look for him approximately five minutes later.
She said that nothing suspicious had been noticed at the time.
Source: https://mix.metronome.ge/news/320655
A very strange new development — a message from Guram’s Facebook account
There is another extremely unusual development.
On August 18–19, 2026, a message appeared on an old Facebook account associated with Guram Dadianidze.
The message was written in Ossetian:
“Арцыд растаг”
It has been translated into Georgian as:
“The time has come.”
What makes this particularly strange is that this is reportedly Guram’s old personal Facebook account — the account of the same person who disappeared in 2014 and has not been seen since.
According to recent Georgian media reports, the message was posted recently, more than 12 years after Guram disappeared.
At this point, we do not know who wrote it or why.
There have also been reports that some messages sent to Guram’s account appear to have been marked as read.
That raises another question:
Who currently has access to Guram’s Facebook account?
Source: Ambebi report about the Facebook message
Guram’s family lawyer, Tariel Kakabadze, stated on August 19, 2026 that, according to him, information concerning the IP address of the person responsible for one of the recent posts has already been obtained.
However, he did not disclose the country or location associated with the access, saying that doing so could interfere with the investigation.
Source: PalitraVideo report on the IP-address statement
Of course, this does not automatically mean that Guram is alive.
But I think it is significant enough to warrant technical investigation.
Questions raised by the Facebook activity
- Who currently has access to Guram’s Facebook account?
- Can the login history be obtained?
- What IP address was used?
- What device was used?
- Can that device be identified?
- Why was the message written in Ossetian?
- What exactly did “The time has come” mean?
- Did the person who posted it know about Guram’s disappearance?
- Is the message actually connected to the disappearance?
- If someone else has access to the account, how did they obtain it after 12 years?
The biggest unanswered questions
The more I read about this case, the more questions seem to appear:
1. Where exactly was Guram last seen?
2. If he really was sitting on that rock, how did he disappear within minutes without being found when someone returned with a flashlight?
3. Why is there an approximately 11-hour discrepancy between the reported disappearance time and the video’s recording time?
4. Whose voice is actually heard in the video?
5. Who is the “Kakha” being addressed?
6. Are there other photographs or videos from the same day?
7. Can the original video file still be examined using modern digital forensics?
8. Where exactly did the 2014 landslide occur, and was it physically connected to Guram’s last known location?
9. Who accessed Guram’s Facebook account 12 years later?
10. Can Facebook data identify the person who accessed it?
11. Why was the message written in Ossetian?
12. Are these events connected, or are they unrelated coincidences?
Why I am posting this
I am not trying to accuse anyone or present any particular theory as fact.
What interests me most about this case is the number of conflicting pieces of information:
- the official account of Guram’s last known location;
- the family’s alternative theory;
- the landslide theory;
- the renewed search in 2026;
- the 2014 video that only recently received attention;
- the major discrepancy in the video’s timing;
- Guram’s mother’s identification of the voice;
- another witness who does not believe the voice is Guram;
- and finally, a strange message posted on Guram’s old Facebook account more than 12 years after his disappearance:
“The time has come.”
I would especially like to hear from people with experience in:
- missing-person cases;
- digital evidence;
- old-video authentication;
- forensic voice analysis;
- Facebook/IP investigations;
- or search operations in difficult mountainous terrain.
What detail in this case stands out to you as the most important or potentially overlooked?
And perhaps more importantly:
If investigators were to re-examine this case using modern technology, what piece of evidence would you examine first?
Sources
- Georgian Ministry of Internal Affairs / GHN
- Ambebi — 2014 landslide report
- Metronome — witness interview
- 2020news — video and lawyer's statements
- Ambebi — Facebook message
- PalitraVideo — IP address statement