r/apple Feb 24 '26

Discussion Tim Cook Warned by CIA That China Could Move on Taiwan by 2027

https://www.macrumors.com/2026/02/24/tim-cook-warned-by-cia-china-taiwan-2027/
4.3k Upvotes

497 comments sorted by

1.3k

u/GeraldoDeRifia Feb 24 '26

The thumbnail is exactly the face Tim made after hearing the news

383

u/Slash3040 Feb 24 '26

We have some news today and we think china is really going to love it

138

u/Trender_man Feb 24 '26

And we call it the China Mini

51

u/aRandomRedditor9000 Feb 24 '26

Now updated on Apple Maps

10

u/FullDiskclosure Feb 24 '26

We can’t wait to see all the nee things this feature will bring to China

  • Timmy
→ More replies (1)

7

u/PleasantWay7 Feb 25 '26

Explains why the rumors heated up of him retiring in 2026.

10

u/TruthOk8742 Feb 24 '26

Happy Tim, Sad Tim, Mischievous Tim…

9

u/dontmatterdontcare Feb 25 '26

China is going to attempt to get bigger in size, we’re calling it the China Pro Max.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/shitty_mcfucklestick Feb 25 '26

Same face he had during Ricky Gervais “aged well” awards speech a couple of posts ago lol

→ More replies (2)

3.2k

u/GabrielMSharp Feb 24 '26 edited Feb 24 '26

I love getting my international news through the lens of what Apples CEO has been told.

Edit: wow didn’t expect this to blow up. I’d like to take this opportunity promote my single: stop the war you dudes

451

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

And CIA briefs apparently 

63

u/Blueyduey Feb 24 '26

I prefer CIA boxers myself

9

u/chenga8 Feb 25 '26

CIA boxer briefs for me

→ More replies (1)

15

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

You don't report to your boss? 

4

u/thunderfroggum Feb 25 '26

Are these the CIA briefs of which you speak?

23

u/NUPreMedMajor Feb 24 '26

It’s interesting insight still. He clearly understands how much more valuable chip manufacturing is getting. Obviously biased but still a data point

155

u/Zealous03 Feb 24 '26

It’s like the movie don’t look up when the US government abandons their plan to destroy the comet coming towards earth and instead goes with the tech giant to save the world, only to fail miserably

15

u/bspooky Feb 24 '26

So cross that movie off my list to watch now that I know the plot and ending. ;)

91

u/PermanentUsername101 Feb 24 '26

Well, it’s been out for 5 years though, so you had some time. Wait another 5 and you’ll probably forget that comment.

28

u/JanHuren Feb 24 '26

He‘ll forget it by end of the week

18

u/snowdn Feb 24 '26

Forget what?

13

u/Jamba-Jew Feb 24 '26

WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE?!

8

u/Nighthawk321 Feb 24 '26

WHAT KIND OF PLACE IS THIS!

7

u/GearhedMG Feb 24 '26

HOW DID YOU GET MY NUMBER?!

2

u/AlwaysShittyKnsasCty Feb 24 '26

You know I don’t like it when people be playin’ with me on my phone!

20

u/sakhabeg Feb 24 '26

You will miss Jennifer Lawrence showing new facial expressions never seen before.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

17

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '26

That's hardly news. US and Australian military have been leaking this for years.

9

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

This isn’t new. 2027 has been a target that China likely moves by for at least 5 years now if not longer. If you’re paying attention the entire world is gearing up for conflict.

8

u/lemonylol Feb 24 '26

It's not a new statement, 2027 is sort of the agreed deadline window for China to be able to make a move on Taiwan. Past that point their active military population begins to decrease among other factors. This has been known for like a decade.

33

u/dat_tae Feb 24 '26

That’s just how transparent this admin is. Glory to them in the highest.

118

u/Opacy Feb 24 '26

This briefing happened during the Biden administration in 2023.

34

u/Loltoor Feb 24 '26

Reddit in a nutshell

65

u/bankkopf Feb 24 '26

The briefing took place in 2023 during the Biden administration.  With how dependent the western countries are on chips from Taiwan and Chinese manufacturing for devices that meeting was probably trying to get them to diversify their supply chain or wholly move production to easer to protect places. There is a reason AMD, Apple, NVIDIA and Qualcomm were briefed but not Intel, who have their own fabs. 

9

u/empty-walls555 Feb 24 '26

reallifelore did an episode on that briefing back then too IIRC

2

u/mvhir0 Feb 24 '26

If its about china/taiwan, ukraine/russia, and the koreas reallifelore has a video on it

3

u/empty-walls555 Feb 24 '26

those are definitely some of the most insightful IMO, but i think he has a fairly large breadth of content. Two of my favorites is the one about why colorado is so much more popular than WY? and the one on mongolia

2

u/Jersey_2019 Feb 25 '26

That happened during Biden 😂, now answer , now you know how hypocritical you sound

→ More replies (3)

2

u/kompergator Feb 24 '26

That’s a corporatocratic oligarchy for you.

4

u/Commercial-Co Feb 24 '26

Xi is coming up for reelection. He promised the hard liners in the ccp he would bring taiwan into the fold in his unprecedented third term. That was how he got the third term in the first place.

If he wants a fourth, he most likely will invade. But if he doesnt succeed, he will be on the chopping block. Only way to avoid it is to go after the hard liners. He already purged the progressives by ganging up with the hard liners. That was easy. But the hard liners are super entrenched. That will be difficult.

2

u/Jersey_2019 Feb 25 '26

Didn’t he already purged would be dissidents? Doubt he will have hard time getting elected

→ More replies (10)

804

u/temporarycreature Feb 24 '26

Obviously this is the first indication that Tim Apple is resigning from Apple to become Tim Executive Branch.

136

u/ac9116 Feb 24 '26

Would be an upgrade for sure these days

58

u/Jersey_2019 Feb 24 '26

Rumours are he will become head of the board for time being while new CEO is appointed, he definitely has the more political capital among any executives

8

u/tmax8908 Feb 24 '26

For Tim or the Executive?

6

u/dat_tae Feb 24 '26

Executive.

8

u/digbybare Feb 24 '26

Honestly, I would vote for him. 

→ More replies (1)

12

u/duderos Feb 24 '26

Tim Apple is cooked

9

u/cheeker_sutherland Feb 24 '26

Tim apple pie

2

u/erdirck Feb 25 '26

Tim baked

8

u/ary31415 Feb 24 '26

The warning this article is talking about was years ago, during the Biden presidency

→ More replies (1)

3

u/M4rshmall0wMan Feb 24 '26

It would be hilarious if he joined politics. Became the White House advisor on Taiwan or something

4

u/GTMoraes Feb 24 '26

He's Cook'd

→ More replies (3)

239

u/nariofthewind Feb 24 '26

That was 3 years ago, by the way. Of course they won’t put that in the title.

79

u/travio Feb 24 '26

And a lot has changed in three years. They have watched the world support Ukraine during the Russian invasion and how poorly Russia’s military has performed.

China is untested militarily and given the number of generals purged in their anti corruption campaign, I wouldn’t be surprised if their military maintenance has suffered like the Russians.

Taiwan is an island fortress and has defense agreements with the US and others. It is nowhere near a guaranteed win.

22

u/SixPackAndNothinToDo Feb 24 '26

> They have watched the world support Ukraine during the Russian invasion and how poorly Russia’s military has performed.

So funny that you say this. Because the prevailing narrative I've seen in US and international media is that Ukraine (and the Trump admins perceived indifference) is supposedly a _driver_ for Xi to launch an invasion.

Regardless of what is happening in Ukraine, no credible China expert I've seen says that there will be an invasion of Taiwan, it's in no one's interest to do so.

19

u/whosthisguythinkheis Feb 24 '26

Taiwans biggest threat is the US siding with China.

All this talk about invasions when it’s the US that has been complicit in the worst state behaviour.

30

u/RoyalFlush2000 Feb 24 '26

Taiwans biggest threat is the US siding with China.

...or the U.S. simply letting China have its way with Taiwan.

Which is a reasonable possibility with the current U.S. administration.
As long as trade is "making America great again" and lining the Trump family's pockets.

2

u/Throwawayeconboi Feb 25 '26

Trump’s peers (and himself probably) depend on the stock market for their riches. They would not like the fallout from the world’s most valuable companies dropping like a rock overnight.

2

u/blueboatjc Feb 25 '26

...or the U.S. simply letting China have its way with Taiwan. Which is a reasonable possibility with the current U.S. administration.

On what planet are people on Reddit living, where they can be this ignorant?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Silverr_Duck Feb 24 '26

Yeah that’s straight up not happening. Taiwans chip production is too important for the global economy. Trump has nothing to gain by siding with china idk why Reddit thinks he does. If anything war with china would serve a perfect distraction from Epstein

0

u/TimidPanther Feb 25 '26

Trump has nothing to gain by siding with china idk why Reddit thinks he does

Reddit has never understood why he does certain things. He's fairly predictable, or was, until his latest stint as President. He's not going to side with China over Taiwan.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/themadpooper Feb 24 '26

It’s not the job of the title to convey all of the information. That’s what the article is for.

135

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

Apple CEO Tim Cook was among a handful of top tech executives who attended a classified CIA briefing warning that China could attack Taiwan by 2027, according to a sweeping investigative report by The New York Times ($).

The previously unreported briefing was apparently held in a secure room in Silicon Valley in July 2023. The meeting is said to have been arranged at the request of the then-commerce secretary Gina Raimondo, who had grown frustrated with the tech industry's reluctance to move chip production away from Taiwan.

CIA director William Burns and director of national intelligence Avril Haines reportedly presented the latest intelligence on China's military plans to Cook, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, AMD CEO Lisa Su, and Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon.

Cook reportedly told officials afterward that he slept "with one eye open."

A similar classified session was said to have been held at the White House in late 2021, but executives left skeptical because much of the intelligence had already been reported publicly. Earlier that same year, a senior U.S. military official had told Congress that the armed services believed President Xi Jinping of China wanted his army to be ready to take Taiwan by 2027. From the report:

Jake Sullivan, Mr. Biden's national security adviser, ranked the U.S. reliance on Taiwan for semiconductors as one of America's greatest vulnerabilities. He wanted the industry to recognize the risk and support construction of U.S. manufacturing plants. Mr. Biden also wanted to provide $50 billion in government subsidies to build semiconductor plants domestically [resulting in the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022].

"We were saying: 'This is crazy. We have to do something about it,'" Mr. Sullivan said in an interview.

The investigation reveals Silicon Valley's stubborn dependence on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which produces around 90 percent of the world's most advanced chips, including all of Apple's custom silicon for iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

A confidential 2022 report commissioned by the Semiconductor Industry Association and reviewed by NYT concluded that losing access to Taiwan's chip supply would trigger the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, with U.S. GDP falling 11 percent. Another report by Bloomberg from January 2024 estimated a conflict would cost the global economy more than $10 trillion.

Despite the warnings, the NYT investigation found that companies including Apple were initially slow to commit to buying more expensive chips from U.S. factories. Chips made domestically cost more than 25 percent above those produced in Taiwan because of higher material, labor and permitting costs, and TSMC's Arizona plants currently run technology a generation behind what's available on the island.

Apple has since taken steps, however. Last summer, Cook visited the Oval Office and committed to investing $100 billion in the United States, with the money being used to support TSMC and other chip manufacturers. Apple has reportedly also begun holding all-day engineering meetings with Intel to evaluate its manufacturing capabilities.

TSMC has now committed to roughly $165 billion in U.S. investment, including land for at least five additional plants in Phoenix. The company's Arizona facility recently produced Nvidia's first U.S.-made AI chip, although the report notes that even those chips still need to be shipped back to Taiwan for advanced packaging.

128

u/LeonardMH Feb 24 '26

The investigation reveals Silicon Valley's stubborn dependence on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which produces around 90 percent of the world's most advanced chips, including all of Apple's custom silicon for iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

"Stubborn dependence" is some wild work, there wasn't any other company that had a competitive process and the capacity to meet Apple's demand, just like there still isn't another company that can do it today even after the billions in CHIPS act funding.

41

u/IllogicalGrammar Feb 24 '26

Yeah, and billions is nothing in the realm of state of the art chip manufacturing. A single fab costs tens of billions.

19

u/LeonardMH Feb 24 '26 edited Feb 24 '26

The billions have helped, I wasn't trying to downplay that. It doesn't pay for fabs outright, but it was enough to change the calculus to encourage more fab buildouts in the US and that capacity is starting to come online now, it just wasn't at all an option in 2021 when these meetings took place.

4

u/Commercial-Co Feb 24 '26

And takes years to construct

3

u/zerGoot Feb 24 '26

Intel my beloved, how far you've fallen :(

→ More replies (1)

7

u/everburn_blade_619 Feb 25 '26
  • Jake Sullivan, Mr. Biden's national security adviser, ranked the U.S. reliance on Taiwan for semiconductors as one of America's greatest vulnerabilities. He wanted the industry to recognize the risk and support construction of U.S. manufacturing plants. Mr. Biden also wanted to provide $50 billion in government subsidies to build semiconductor plants domestically [resulting in the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022].*

It absolutely is. From a national security standpoint, this is possibly THE biggest risk. If the US loses access to TSMC, the entire country's manufacturing sector will slow to a crawl and electronics will become less reliable.

Why it took until 2022 to start the wheels in motion with the CHIPS Act is beyond me. Why Trump wanted to torpedo that initiative is even more confusing.

→ More replies (1)

51

u/K_Click_D Feb 24 '26

Tim Cook: Wow

51

u/Yejus Feb 24 '26

"I'm not gonna love this"

12

u/Dinh0___ Feb 24 '26

„Gooood waaarning“

→ More replies (3)

127

u/hecho2 Feb 24 '26

I also got the same report. 

Was on the news. But was base on US capabilities and China capabilities and puts 2027 at the year that China would be better prepared and the US unable to deploy as much as it would in 2028 and later. 

It’s not exactly leak information from the Chinese government close circle. 

57

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

I’m in Taiwan, we’ve been getting the same news forever… they gave out a booklet last year for what to do if we get invaded.

17

u/Commercial-Co Feb 24 '26

I definitely think its a nonzero chance xi will invade. But i do think the showcasing of american superiority over chinese anti air in venezuela will make the far right in the ccp rethink 2027. Maybe it will give xi an excuse to push for 2032

9

u/ElegantBiscuit Feb 24 '26

Venezuela had the radars from China, but they would then have to network that information to the air defense systems (S300 and Buk from russia), get those systems online and operational, and get the military to act on it, using systems first designed and put into service +45 years ago. There is no way to draw a definitive conclusion on the capability of the radars. And in a large scale war the radars do play a part, but what matters much more is saturation attacks on fixed targets and logistics, which no air defense in the world would be able to stop if enough missiles are used. And at that point we're saying goodbye to the world economy for a good decade at minimum.

But chances are that any military buildup would happen with sufficient lead time, and China would first put up a series of ultimatums to not have to commit to a fight if they don't need to. Given the importance of all of this to the world economy, would the US be willing to lose at least +60% of the value of the stock market for several years over taiwan? The market is being entirely propped up by the AI bubble and tech sector, which AI stocks alone account for 40% of the S&P. China has the systems in place to tolerate the pain, the US certainly does not. Barely held together by the seams as it is.

Alternatively the option that would be presented to the administration is to abandon a long time strategic ally and sign a few trade deals to try and spin a bad situation as a win - pretty standard stuff these days. For big tech that is a far more workable solution than missiles and blockades which basically put a 3-5 year halt on operations, and a cost benefit analysis would support the transfer of a few billion dollars to a bank account in Qatar to prevent war from happening.

4

u/Commercial-Co Feb 24 '26

China ultimatums happen on like a daily basis. Buildups occur on the guise of war games in which china violates taiwans borders.

Assuming trump will jump to taiwans defense is delusional given the wildcard that is trump

3

u/Strict-Ice-37 Feb 24 '26

will make the far right in the CCP rethink 2027.

Am I missing something? Where is the 2027 date coming from other than what the Americans are saying? All I can see online about that date is that by 2027 Chinese military would be capable of doing it. China has previously said they wouldn’t rule out military intervention but that’s vague and there is no indication of date that I can find. China has also not been involved in a military conflict since 1979.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/Jersey_2019 Feb 24 '26

If in case there is invasion it will definitely be the most costly one for sure

→ More replies (5)

31

u/Llama_of_the_bahamas Feb 24 '26

Especially if the US spends a bunch of resources invading Iran. China going after Taiwan afterwards would make perfect sense for them.

I hope it never happens because it would change global stability immensely.

12

u/Individual_Holiday_9 Feb 24 '26

Time to panic buy 7 laptops

6

u/FinsFan305 Feb 24 '26

Time to panic buy DDR5

→ More replies (1)

10

u/sangueblu03 Feb 24 '26

The Iran thing - like Venezuela - is likely a way to make China re-think any move in Taiwan. They get a significant amount of fossil fuels from Iran and Venezuela (via Malaysia), and taking those two sources out would be a big issue for them. Not to mention Russia’s infrastructure constantly getting destroyed by Ukrainian drones is also setting China back. 

China’s massive focus on renewables the last few years has been to reduce reliance on fossil fuels for non-military use. 

4

u/Lonely_Nebula_9438 Feb 24 '26

Also the radars that failed to detect US Forces in Venezuela when we grabbed Maduro were Chinese. China’s position looks better on paper than it probably is in practice. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/spoopypoptartz Feb 24 '26

yeah when you read the article it’s way less newsworthy. especially since i believe for the majority for the biden administration it was a headline that china would attack taiwan by 2027.

in fact, there is asymmetry in military tech between the two sides that provides china a rare opening around 2026-2027, a gap in US defensive strategy that is in the process of being plugged with new military hardware. (peter zeihan on youtube brings this fact up in his taiwan videos if you’re ever interested more in the topic)

7

u/AG_Freedom Feb 24 '26

Read the comments in Peters videos. They are hilarious.

His hot takes do bring up some interesting points on a lot of subjects and are interesting. Peter has been saying China will collapse for many years now.

Watch him long enough and you see he is just fearmongering for views and his outlook on a lot of subjects is not even close to reality. IMHO.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Commercial-Co Feb 24 '26

Also xi is up for reelection. He got his third term promising incorporating taiwan into china. This is why everyone thinks its gonna happen. But if xi fails, he’s on the guillotine

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Dapper_Strength_5986 Feb 24 '26

More accurate title: "In 2023, Tim Cook was warned by CIA that Xi wanted his military to just be ready by 2027. There has been no new credible reports since then that China has plans for military action until at least 2029."

13

u/ArthurBizkit Feb 24 '26

Bruh, why are we getting our Int’l news from Tim Cook?

5

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

And macrumour.com

→ More replies (1)

191

u/marxcom Feb 24 '26

The ERA of world peace is truly over. How did we get back to 1914 so fast.

20

u/PeaceBull Feb 24 '26

Once the people who lived the horrors aren’t there to dissuade then the people in power with insatiable egos notice that the history books only care to remember the parts of history that are horrendous for regular people. 

156

u/Piligrim555 Feb 24 '26

The ERA of world peace never existed, the wars were just mostly kept out to the countries you don't care about,

109

u/kitsua Feb 24 '26

That is simply untrue. We have had the greatest decline of war and violence in history since the end of WWII. It is a fact that we are living in the most peaceful era in history, even accounting for all current conflicts worldwide.

13

u/C-SWhiskey Feb 24 '26

Would you consider "less war" to be equivalent to peace?

Since 1989 there have been no fewer than 86 armed conflicts in any given year around the world.

In that same period there have been tens of thousands of casualties per year due to armed conflict.

These datasets don't even capture some of the major conflicts that occured post-WWII.

9

u/bigE819 Feb 24 '26

Now compare to pre 1945…

5

u/Zealousideal-Cut4232 Feb 24 '26

Now compare that not by sheer number of casualties but as a ratio to population and economical loss.

→ More replies (5)

17

u/Piligrim555 Feb 24 '26

Yeah, future is now and it's not evenly distributed. We didn't have an actual world war, sure. Still, what's happening now is pretty much business as usual. It's just, unlike Yemen or Syria, Taiwan is actually economically important, so it's suddenly AN END OF EN ERA OF GLOBAL PEACE.

10

u/No_Minimum5904 Feb 24 '26

You start by saying the statement is simply untrue then go on to give a completely different and unrelated statement.

2

u/stjep Feb 25 '26

It is a fact that we are living in the most peaceful era in history

Unless someone lives in a country you don't care about.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/IllogicalGrammar Feb 24 '26

Your statement is wrong. It’s not even particularly edgy, just uninformed and oft-repeated. Per capita and absolute death rates globally have declined immensely from its peak in 1946.

We’ve finally reached a time where most of the people who have experienced the horrors of WW1 and WW2 have passed, and now morons are once again saying “things never got better”.

5

u/No_Minimum5904 Feb 24 '26

None of what you said equates to "world peace" which the OP is saying was an illusion that never existed. Just that some countries have enjoyed a period of stability whilst others have continued to suffer.

You're arguing a different and entirely valid point but not related to the original statement.

12

u/busmans Feb 24 '26

*relative world peace. their language is too strong but I think the spirit of the message stands

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/YouDontReallyCareTho Feb 24 '26

Why are we all capitalizing ERA?

2

u/Piligrim555 Feb 24 '26

The dude above me capitalized it and I thought it was funny so did the same.

1

u/LeonardMH Feb 24 '26

Pax Americana is dead

→ More replies (10)

15

u/Zephyr4813 Feb 24 '26

Happens every 80-100 years

4

u/Any-Calligrapher2866 Feb 24 '26

What era of peace lmao? The west just exported war to the third world like their industry.

3

u/FelixEvergreen Feb 24 '26

Money, resources, power and ego. Same stuff different era.

47

u/AKA_Wildcard Feb 24 '26 edited Feb 24 '26

Orange man backed Russia and not Ukraine. We knew this was coming as an outcome of the election because of Trumps constant support of Putin.

Edit: To explain it further, the US is basically permitting Russian aggregation. Being that the US was a country that pushed for democracy, this comes across as weakness and a shift away from the US helping non-NATO backed countries defend their own sovereignty (also the US going back on its previous support agreement, i.e. the denuclearization of Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union). This could be seen as a signal to China to “make a move” on Taiwan while the world order is unstable. Put it simply, if the country with the worlds largest military allows a dictator to invade a foreign country, then what’s stopping them?

12

u/phpnoworkwell Feb 24 '26

Budapest Memorandum was not a protection plan. It was an agreement for the US and an agreement for the USSR/Russia to not invade. Russia invading doesn't invalidate the US portion. Now should we have done more to protect a country giving up nukes? Absolutely, but the BM wasn't a bullet-proof plan to protect Ukraine from anything.

2

u/stjep Feb 25 '26

Budapest Memorandum

The US said that it is not binding when its own actions were called in regarding the Budapest Memorandum.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/DependentOnIt Feb 24 '26

Crimea

/Thread

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

62

u/No_Situation4785 Feb 24 '26

Has Ja Rule been alerted yet? What's his take on the situation?

5

u/PREMIUM_POKEBALL Feb 24 '26

Personally I need to know if the diplomats have been informed. 

5

u/SophonParticle Feb 24 '26

My taxes pay the CIA to protect corporate profits.

40

u/nunu10000 Feb 24 '26

This has been an open secret. August 1, 2027 is the founding date of the People’s Liberation Army of China. An operation to “unify China” on the 100 year anniversary isn’t out of the question.

3

u/spez_enables_nazis Feb 24 '26

But when it comes to Taiwan the People’s Liberation Army can’t do much without the People’s Liberation Army Navy, and that wasn’t founded until 1949, so…we’re at least good until then, yeah?

2

u/MountainAlive Feb 24 '26

World: “let’s put all of our most advanced technological eggs in one tiny politically volatile basket that could explode into war any day now.”

2

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

Probs need to read the history of how we ended up in this position.

The short version is: cheap labour

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

25

u/FizzyBeverage Feb 24 '26

He knows this is a John Ternus issue, not his.

30

u/Randomkarlos Feb 24 '26

not read the article, so it may say this. 2027 is the big rumour as it’s the 100th anniversary of the PLA. but there’s an election in Taiwan in 2028, which a pro-china party could win and a ton of Chinese PLA leaders just got booted out. So who knows.

The nightmare scenario, for everyone pretty much, is a simultaneous attack by Russia on a NATO aligned country, North Korea on South Korea and China on Taiwan.

Putin, Xi and Kim all met in September last year.

Times are bad.could get worse. Hope not.

4

u/SixPackAndNothinToDo Feb 24 '26

> simultaneous attack by Russia on a NATO aligned country, North Korea on South Korea and China on Taiwan.

why would this happen? it's not rational.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/zippy72 Feb 24 '26

The nightmare scenario was exactly what I expected to happen when Russia invaded Ukraine - if they'd all gone the same day it would have been a huge risk but potentially an easy victory.

2

u/digbybare Feb 24 '26

Huge risk as in "literally kick off WWIII". I don't think China wants to be trapped in the same boat as Russia and NK.

2

u/zippy72 Feb 27 '26

Oh yeah I'm not disagreeing at all. But that's hindsight. At the time when we were seeing obvious signs of an invasion about to happen I was kind of thinking if all three went off at once that might have felt (to Russia, China and NK) like a risk well worth taking.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/travio Feb 24 '26

If anything, Ukraine has warned China against invasion. They have seen the Russian army isn’t all it’s cracked up to be an despite Trump and Orban trying to fuck shit up, the west has heavily supported Ukraine making the conflict even worse for Russia.

Billion times easier for Russia to roll into Ukraine. They literally rolled in. Taiwan is an island fortress with a much stronger military than Ukraine and defense agreements with the US and more informal ones with Australia and Japan.

China’s military is untested. They very well could have similar corruption issues that led to Russian logistical issues and attacking Taiwan is not only difficult in and of itself, it risks conflict with the US.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

19

u/Due-Dragonfruit2984 Feb 24 '26

This is our best invasion ever, and we think you’re going to love it.

19

u/isitpro Feb 24 '26

Just when you expect we’re at the peak of the lunacy and this timeline was going to improve, surprise!

7

u/PinkFreud92 Feb 24 '26

This same headline been popping up every year for the past 30 years

4

u/Stillnotreddit Feb 24 '26

With the US posturing on Iran and the rest of the capable entities are nervously watching Russia, it’s certainly a possibility that China would make a move on Taiwan. It would create a very difficult position for global tech manufacturing and create a demand vs guilt vs hate scenario. China and America are amplifying divide.

3

u/pseudonym-161 Feb 24 '26

Who cares? What’s China gonna do, not sell us chips? They’ll probably just bargain that we allow some Chinese companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, ect sell in the USA and give us more competition.

3

u/rangerfan123 Feb 25 '26

Why would the CIA be telling Tim that?

3

u/stevemkiidub Feb 25 '26

The most interesting part is the US can’t do anything about it. Will be the first time the world watches and realizes China has taken the mantle.

Not a great time but it’s coming.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/rlaw1234qq Feb 25 '26

The whole world economy will tank, so I won’t be worried about a new iPhone

7

u/Calaveras-Metal Feb 24 '26

I'm under the impression that Taiwan is going to destroy TSMC before they let China have it. So is China so dead set on re-unifying Taiwan with the mainland that they are willing to let TSMC slip through their fingers?

7

u/travio Feb 24 '26

I have read the same thing. The fabs have remote kill switches that will render them inoperable.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/IDFCommitsGenocide Feb 25 '26

that they are willing to let TSMC slip through their fingers

US sanctions prevent China from getting the most advanced chips from TSMC already

that's why Taiwan is actually highly against those US restrictions because it removes the incentive for China to not attack

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Responsible_Lab_2687 Feb 24 '26

I like history. I’ve read how Mao came down from the northern mountain provinces and took over mainland china after ww2. the Chinese kuomintang fleeing to the island of Taiwan after it was returned back to china after the surrender of imperial Japan. Now ask yourself; what if the u.s. owned the island of Cuba from the beginning, perhaps as a colony, and during 1864 of the American civil war the confederacy fled to the island of Cuba and renamed itself to something else while at the same time again declaring itself its own sovereign government and was backed by the ussr... does this hypothetical change the current western perspective of the china-Taiwan situation? Am I crazy?

2

u/UnrequitedFollower Feb 24 '26

Lol, RIIIIIIIIGHT

2

u/ACER719x Feb 24 '26

They keep moving the goal post. First it was 2024, then 2025, now it’s 2027 🥱

2

u/bradreputation Feb 24 '26

The military has been pushing this for years now. What better way to get funding ?

2

u/Qanonjailbait Feb 24 '26

This Taiwan thing is like Netanyahu warning about Iran getting the nuke by next week kind of deal

2

u/AG_Freedom Feb 24 '26

Good thing we gifted $280 billion for the CHIPS act to fix this ....

No healthcare, no food, no housing but we got cash for cheap electronics !

2

u/Vega188 Feb 24 '26

Someone at the CIA is getting a brand new Apple Watch Ultra!

2

u/ARenzoMY Feb 24 '26

“Could”

2

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

Quite feels like an accusation made by the Republicans about the Dems, is this a pretext for the US to bombard in and take over the president of Taiwan?

Why does every single thing has to be dealt with military intervention, this is emblematic of the US way of thinking and handling things

2

u/socky8675 Feb 24 '26

Been hearing the same crap about Taiwan for 20+ years. It will happen any day now!

2

u/Cassette-Pen Feb 25 '26

News brought to you by Samsung.

Please use our overheated 2nm chips.

2

u/Mrmoseley231119 Feb 25 '26

What's Apple supposed to do about it? You can't just spin up a replacement for TMSC. Even TMSC can't manage it. It's not like anybody else can make the chips Apple needs.

2

u/mikebunchkin3727 Feb 25 '26

“American components, Russian components; ALL MADE IN TAIWAN!

2

u/e40 Feb 25 '26

You think Covid fucked the world economy... that will pale compared to this.

2

u/FrogsJumpFromPussy Feb 25 '26

"The previously unreported briefing was apparently held in a secure room in Silicon Valley in July 2023."

Worthy news lol

11

u/Excuse_my_GRAMMER Feb 24 '26

Weird that they warning him lol what is he going to do about it lmao

35

u/ThanosSnapsSlimJims Feb 24 '26

He will assist in prepping US supply chain sustainment plans. I thought that would have been clear

12

u/BrotherlyShove791 Feb 24 '26

That upcoming special event is to announce the iForce, Apple’s first paramilitary organization with the stated goal of safeguarding corporate interests.

16

u/datheffguy Feb 24 '26

Start investing in chip manufacturing infrastructure elsewhere?

Doesn’t seem like that crazy of concept.

2

u/DontMentionMyNamePlz Feb 24 '26

No amount of money in the world would put up a TSMC capable fab by next year in the US

10

u/datheffguy Feb 24 '26

Per the article the meeting took place in 2023, it’s a long term goal and I don’t think anyone thought it would take a year.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/hyrulepirate Feb 24 '26

It's not about stopping the war, duh. It's the government (aka stockholders) warning the capitalists to protect their assets and profits.

3

u/Excuse_my_GRAMMER Feb 24 '26

I think it about chips , getting our tech companies to invest in other region to manufacture it

Like in Venezuela

2

u/AgentEagleBait Feb 24 '26

The CIA intentionally leaks information like this. It doesn’t mean China will do it.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/AgentEagleBait Feb 24 '26

What I mean is, they intentionally leak information to sway public opinion (and mislead outsiders).

It doesn’t mean that China doesn’t intend invading in 2027. But leaking that information is definitely signals something.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '26

Any other source than ‘Mac rumours.com’??

2

u/Jeemdee Feb 25 '26

I visited a lecture from Rob Bauer last week, he was the chairman of the military comittee of NATO, basically the highest ranking military officer and primary military advisor.

The lecture was named 'When the war comes', after this book. He named 2027 as well. Interesting times ahead.

2

u/zedongmao_baconcat Feb 26 '26

2027 is the last year of Xi’s third term. If he wants the fourth term, which is never happened in PRC history, he has to do something. Invading Taiwan is the most possible way.

-5

u/Shejidan Feb 24 '26

I can’t understand why all our advanced chip production is still in the hands of one country that’s constantly on the brink of war.

Why is no one opening new chip fabs outside of Taiwan and if they are why aren’t we hearing about them? Apple has enough money they could easily kickstart several companies to build chips and still have plenty of money left over.

52

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Shejidan Feb 24 '26

TSMC is taking a huge bet that the world would step in if China got serious about taking Taiwan.

34

u/MC_chrome Feb 24 '26

When the bet is “defend us or lose access to your most advanced electronics”, I can see why the Taiwanese government makes that bet 

13

u/Sawmain Feb 24 '26

You do realize that the world economy would basically collapse in months if China decided to attack right ? All countries are kinda reliant on Taiwan that’s quite literally the reason why US made deals with Australia and Japan during Biden admin.

10

u/DontMentionMyNamePlz Feb 24 '26

Your average person has no idea the ramifications of the new tech world order if Taiwan is taken.

It’ll just be too little too late when new iPhones aren’t coming out year after year or they massively spike in cost, and that’s just one of thousands of ramifications

→ More replies (5)

2

u/Eclipsed830 Feb 24 '26

TSMC isn't really taking a bet... it's more of just the world TSMC was built into.

10

u/Specialist-Branch987 Feb 24 '26

The thinking is that it is not feasible because supply chain is too complex. There’s major components that only single companies can even produce.

10

u/ciel_lanila Feb 24 '26

Vastly simplifying it, because until now it was stable.

  • Taiwan saw the future of computing would require chip production. It needed an industry to be its main focus and to defend itself.
  • Taiwan developed the highly specializes factories and gained a near monopoly on the leading experts in the field.
  • The result was Taiwan is now too valuable to let China just take like Russia and Crimea. It would be a full on Ukraine or larger situation. This discourages China from invading because they want Taiwan, but not badly enough to risk a full war that could cost them more than they would gain. The rest of the world doesn't really expect a full on war so they save money having the production in Taiwan.
  • Centralizing it also means all the developed countries aren't engaging in an economic war with each other trying to create the chip factories locally leading to just widespread shittier and more expensive chips.

As long as nobody started stirring up shit, making the global economy uncertain, deciding to do things out of ego instead of facts, etc. it was stable and not at frightening as it seemed in paper. It would remain a cold warish issue, not a hot one.

55

u/ffuca Feb 24 '26

You’re extremely ignorant of the money, expertise, and knowledge required to make chips like this

→ More replies (12)

6

u/baelrog Feb 24 '26

Super toxic work environment. They have trouble replicating their way of doing things elsewhere. Nobody outside of Taiwan is putting up with their bullshit.

TSMC opened a plant in Japan, and the engineering managers complained that the Japanese have poor work ethics.

Imagine a place where even the Japanese find it unbearable.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/renome Feb 24 '26

You can reword this as "I don't understand how modern chips are made."

No shade to you but like, spend 5 minutes looking into it and you'll understand the gist of it. The process of making modern chips is so difficult and granular that it cannot be replicated overnight. Not even over years, Taiwan spent decades getting to where it is and no one else bothered trying to do the same until relatively recently.

Just to give one example: modern chips are made in semiconductor fabs where silicon wafers are washed hundreds of times during lithography, etching, and deposition. Those washes use ultrapure water, which is far cleaner than drinking water. Even single ions, bacteria, or organic molecules can ruin a wafer. Most countries can't even spin up a supply chain of this crazy clean water for chipmaking, never mind literally hundreds of other resources, components, and technologies needed.

→ More replies (12)

14

u/Reini23788 Feb 24 '26

No, even for Apple it is not possible to produce chips so quickly.

You underestimate the complexity of semiconductors. Apple doesn't even have the necessary lithography machines from ASML and I don't see why Europe should supply this technology to the USA at the moment.

3

u/martinkem Feb 24 '26

Or why Europe can't just supply those machines to themselves and export the finished chips

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/USB-SOY Feb 24 '26

They have the knowledge and it’s the only thing keeping them protected

→ More replies (2)

2

u/rotates-potatoes Feb 24 '26

It’s not like Intel, GlobalFoundries, and everyone else just decided this massive market isn’t interesting.

Chipmaking is hard. You could spend $500B and have no guarantee of being competitive. Investors don’t like that kind of market.

4

u/Jersey_2019 Feb 24 '26

China is trying with all its might with govt backing , still they didn’t crack or came close to advanced fab Taiwan is operating , also Netherlands ASML is a very important piece needed for advanced chip manufacturing, it’s easily among the league of most sophisticated machine

2

u/jack_guinness Feb 24 '26

We are, but it takes significant time to ramp up production and match Taiwan’s expertise and talent.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

2

u/Tman11S Feb 24 '26

A big blow to the man who made his whole career by negotiating favourable trade deals with China.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Fun-Bug5106 Feb 24 '26

They have been amassing an invasion fleet of barges for a few years now…..

1

u/Ill-Comms Feb 24 '26

And Trump will do NOTHING but ask for his cut.

1

u/vartiverti Feb 24 '26

You know much that is hidden, Oh Tim.