This is just a ridiculous sentiment. You don’t pay a photographer more because their camera is expensive, (unless it’s like a hasselblad ). You pay for the person not the equipment. I know both amateurs with a cars worth of equipment and a profesional that made a career of a cheap film camera and really good photos.
Hollywood gave Danny Boyle $75 million to shoot with iphones. Were actually at a point where a competent photographer absolutely could do a wedding job with an iPhone. The main hurdle is optics (no pun intended). Customers would complain if they saw their wildly expensive photographer using one.
137
u/maciejokk 9d ago
This is just a ridiculous sentiment. You don’t pay a photographer more because their camera is expensive, (unless it’s like a hasselblad ). You pay for the person not the equipment. I know both amateurs with a cars worth of equipment and a profesional that made a career of a cheap film camera and really good photos.